I read with some dismay about Taipei's plans to fine bicyclists who fail to adhere to traffic laws.
The report cited an increasing number of bicycle-related injuries annually as the motivation for this crackdown on cyclists, with last year's number of such accidents totalling 885. What concerns me is that it appears cyclists are being singled out as the sole cause of such accidents and thus solely deserving of reprimand.
I recently acquired an excellent bicycle from Giant of Taiwan, and have been riding extensively around Taipei while working on music projects here. In all my experiences cycling in countries such as the US, Canada, Germany, Austria and Italy, I have never experienced cycling like here in Taipei. From my observations, the greatest risk to cyclists are taxi drivers -- who seem to believe they are the masters of the roadway -- and city buses seemingly anxious to stay on schedule.
I have been repeatedly cut off by both and no measure of safe distancing seems to prevent this danger.
I have also noticed a glaring absence of planning and infrastructure for bicycles in Taipei. I do recognize and applaud the work Taipei has done for creating bicycle paths along the rivers and I have biked from Taipei to Danshui on many occasions. But within Taipei itself, there are no bicycle lanes that I have seen and cyclists are simply left to do battle with the traffic at large.
Leaving cyclists to fend for themselves on Taipei's aggressive roadways will undoubtedly result in the cyclist losing that competition again and again; hence the soaring accident rate. Perhaps it would be more suitable to consider how to better accommodate cyclists in Taipei.
I commend Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin's (
However, if Hau truly wishes to support and promote cycling in Taipei -- which in turn contributes to improving the air quality in one of Taiwan's smoggiest cities -- I hope he will do more than simply restrict fines to the most errant of bicyclists. I encourage him to thoroughly review Taipei's roadways from a bicycling perspective, consult with cities in foreign countries and bring real improvement to this city's traffic system.
I also invite him to get on his bicycle and give me a call. I'll be happy to ride with him through the "wild west" of Taipei's busier streets in an effort to give him some first-hand experience of what combat-cycling in Taipei is like.
Matthew Lien
Taipei
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS