Last month I and several other Taiwanese-Americans attended a panel discussion with Ramon Myers of Stanford University, Jialin Zhang (章嘉琳) and Shih Chih-yu (石之瑜) of National Taiwan University. The panel was moderated by Stanford University professor Larry Diamond.
Myers and Zhang talked about a book they had co-authored, titled The Struggle across the Taiwan Strait: The Divided China Problem. Diamond and Shih then spoke about democracy and referred to a recent survey which indicated that an increasing number of people in Taiwan were identifying themselves as Taiwanese rather than Chinese.
Shih, however, insisted that democracy in Taiwan was not a democracy and went so far as to say that Taiwan's democracy was in fact a failure.
When the time came for the audience to ask questions, Susan Liu, a Taiwanese living in the US, said that when the Chinese Communist Party and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) were killing each other in China, Taiwan was under Japanese colonial occupation. When Japan ceded Taiwan after World War II, no receiving country was ever named.
In such a situation, the UN Charter stipulates that the sovereignty of a country should be decided by its citizens, based on the right of self-determination. So one can conclude, therefore, that Taiwan never was part of China.
Myers mentioned the Cairo meeting, where it was decided that Taiwan would be handed over to China. I asked Myers whether the Cairo Declaration had been signed by interested countries and he replied that it was not.
I asked why the human rights of people -- regardless of whether they called themselves Taiwanese or Chinese -- had not been respected, to which Diamond replied: "Are you talking about the right of self-determination for the Taiwanese?"
In response to this, Shih said: "Human rights do not belong to enemies."
I could not believe my ears and was dumfounded by Shih's painting the Taiwanese as enemies.
As the panel discussion continued, Myers, perhaps in an attempt to diminish the pressure after Shih's comment, said that even if some people have strong beliefs and opinions about certain subjects, tolerance and dialogue will always be needed.
Diamond then turned to Beijing's threat of military force should Taiwan declare independence, adding that such a development could very well lead to war between the US and China.
A few Taiwanese ladies approached professor Shih after the discussion and tried to have a talk with him.
Radical and uncivil remarks such as those made by Shih during the event need to be brought to the attention of the Taiwanese.
Sophia Deng
California
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS