This week the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the People First Party (PFP) took turns blasting the government for providing aid to the nation's allies in the South Pacific. Conveniently, they did not account for Taiwan's diplomatic predicament nor the allies' genuine humanitarian needs.
Taiwan's economic success was built on the back of hard work, but along the way this nation's allies also extended a helping hand. After World War II, a poverty-stricken Taiwan -- looted in part by the KMT -- received help in the form of cash, material and medicinal aid from its wealthier allies, eventually including the US. Now that Taiwan has been fortunate enough to join the ranks of the affluent, it should not forget this history and the responsibility that the well-to-do have for supporting friends in need.
There is no denying that political benefit flows from strategic delivery of aid. The problems start when aid is misused or cut off from those in need when political factors overwhelm humanitarian ones. The pan-blue camp's criticism of "politicized aid" on this score is idiotic. Everything the government is doing is about the same as what KMT administrations have done in the past -- and would do again.
In fact, it is most likely that what is being done is being done better than before, given that there is far more oversight now of Taiwan's diplomatic corps and aid programs.
Equally contemptible is the pan-blue claim that Taiwanese are suffering because they are not the first priority of the government and are losing out to foreign aid recipients. There are, of course, poor families and individuals in Taiwan who need the help of the government, as there are such people in every country -- but that does not and should not forbid those governments from donating generously to the wretched in other countries, either in the long term or in answer to crisis situations.
A balance needs to be struck in accomplishing both objectives.
Criticizing the government's South Pacific diplomacy therefore makes little sense. The PFP, however, has gone to the extreme of accusing allies of "political extortion." This type of attack and name-calling will contribute nothing to the health of Taiwan's diplomacy -- indeed, it is the type of attack that emboldens pro-China forces not only within the allies' administrations, but also in other countries where Taiwan needs to exert the most influence.
Every one of President Chen Shui-bian's (
That the public is never offered a coherent alternative betrays such language for the waffle that it is: populist nonsense that would be disowned at the very moment that the pan-blue camp next comes to power. In this sense, Taiwan's allies have reason to be comforted that foreign affairs is under the control of people with some insight. For the rest of us, however, there is little comfort to be had watching legislators make Taiwan sound like a blinkered haven for greed.
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
RSS