Following the ratification of amendments to the Constitution last year, any further changes must be given final approval by the public through referendums. The power to change the Constitution has thus been granted directly to those with whom sovereignty resides, namely you and me. Given that the power to reform the Constitution belongs to all Taiwanese, women should also be concerned about taking part in the process. They should hold this issue closer to their hearts than men, and actively lead and promote constitutional reform for women and for all.
Women should ask whether provisions in the Constitution dealing with gender equality are too simplified. Do they only provide superficial, formalized gender equality, rather than considering differences between men and women based on real social needs and power structures, in order to offer equality and guarantees that are truly in line with reality?
Women should ask why the Constitution -- which has merely a dozen articles dealing with fundamental human rights -- fails to take into consideration several important issues of the deepest interest to women of different socio-economic status, ethnicity or even nationalities. These issues include, for example, the right to personal autonomy, body integrity, sexual autonomy, health, freedom of marriage (including same-sex marriage or union), the right to native language and to choose one's own name, children's rights (including rights to be educated and raised), citizenship rights to immigrate, emigrate and naturalize, labor rights for local and migrant workers, and last but not the least, the right of cultural recognition.
Women of course are part of "the people," but why does the Constitution fail to address issues that women encounter over and over again?
Women should ask why the political structure under the Constitution is in complete disarray, causing many of them to worry that the government may not be able to effectively carry out important policies such as national defense, environmental sustainability, health and welfare. Is a Cabinet system or a presidential system better in terms of producing a responsible government that can be trusted by women? What kind of electoral system will produce elected representatives of a higher standard? Is the ratio of women in the administrative, legislative and judicial institutions at the central and local levels disproportionately low?
A number of emerging democracies have established under their constitutions gender equality committees, and set up human -rights commissions or charged certain officials with protecting human rights, stipulating that these positions should be held to a large extent by women. People may wonder whether Taiwan should follow these nations and adopt a similar design.
Moreover, women should ask what Taiwan's identity and future will be, and whether the Constitution of the Republic of China should be given a more thorough review or even a name change. They should also ask what the nationality our next and future generations will be, and if they will have to continue to tolerate diplomatic isolation by the international community.
If all women, regardless of their socio-economic status, ethnicity and even nationality, could gain an understanding of the urgency of constitutional reform, it would have a great impact on matters large and small in their daily lives. If they could bravely stand up to express their concern and even take a lead in the process, then I believe that constitutional reform would be successful and beneficial not only to women but to all people.
Chang Wen-chen is an assistant professor in the College of Law at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Lin Ya-ti
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
Before the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) can blockade, invade, and destroy the democracy on Taiwan, the CCP seeks to make the world an accomplice to Taiwan’s subjugation by harassing any government that confers any degree of marginal recognition, or defies the CCP’s “One China Principle” diktat that there is no free nation of Taiwan. For United States President Donald Trump’s upcoming May 14, 2026 visit to China, the CCP’s top wish has nothing to do with Trump’s ongoing dismantling of the CCP’s Axis of Evil. The CCP’s first demand is for Trump to cease US
RSS