I agree wholeheartedly with Thor McGillacuddy (Letters, Jan. 9) on bringing over China's pandas and renaming them. There are nay-sayers who claim that taking these cuddly friends would be "against" sound cross-strait diplomacy or sound environmental policy. Let's put these straw men to rest.
First, the sending of pandas is the ultimate diplomatic compliment from the Beijing government. Does Beijing conduct diplomacy with governments it does not recognize? No. Does Beijing send pandas to governments it does not like? Again the answer is, of course, no. After years of sour threats from Beijing, does it really make sense to ignore friendlier overtures? Of course not. Let China send pandas to us so long as they do not send us missiles.
Second, it is simply junk science to argue that pandas should not come on ecological grounds.
The as-yet unnamed pandas were born and raised in captivity and are completely unprepared for life in the wild, where they would starve to death. Lame arguments are sometimes raised that these are non-native species. The fact that Taiwan doesn't have pandas of its own is precisely why they are an attraction. People don't go to zoos to see common animals like squirrels, dogs and kittens; they go for the exotic lions, tigers and elephants.
These pandas would serve as a tangible reminder to the Taiwanese people and hundreds of thousands of foreign tourists of the importance of preserving habitats around the world.
Let's not let emotion get in the way of sound cross-strait and environmental policy. As has already been correctly suggested, no matter what China calls the pandas, we can give them our own names upon arrival.
J. Ronald Buttercam
Taipei
The Cabinet on Nov. 6 approved a NT$10 billion (US$318.4 million) four-year plan to build tourism infrastructure in mountainous areas and the south. Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) on Tuesday announced that the Ministry of Transportation and Communications would offer weekday accommodation discounts, birthday specials and other domestic travel incentives beginning next March, aiming to encourage more travel outside the usual weekend and holiday peaks. The government is right to focus on domestic tourism. Although the data appear encouraging on the surface — as total domestic trips are up compared with their pre-COVID-19 pandemic numbers — a closer look tells a different
For more than seven decades, the Chinese Communist Party has claimed to govern Tibet with benevolence and progress. I have seen the truth behind the slogans. I have listened to the silences of monks forbidden to speak of the Dalai Lama, watched the erosion of our language in classrooms, and felt the quiet grief of a people whose prayers are monitored and whose culture is treated as a threat. That is why I will only accept complete independence for Tibet. The so-called “autonomous region” is autonomous in name only. Decisions about religion, education and cultural preservation are made in Beijing, not
Apart from the first arms sales approval for Taiwan since US President Donald Trump took office, last month also witnessed another milestone for Taiwan-US relations. Trump signed the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act into law on Tuesday. Its passing without objection in the US Senate underscores how bipartisan US support for Taiwan has evolved. The new law would further help normalize exchanges between Taiwanese and US government officials. We have already seen a flurry of visits to Washington earlier this summer, not only with Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍), but also delegations led by National Security Council Secretary-General Joseph Wu
I recently watched a panel discussion on Taiwan Talks in which the host rightly asked a critical question: Why is the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China (IPAC) spearheading a robust global movement to reject China’s ongoing distortion of UN Resolution 2758? While the discussion offered some context, a more penetrating analysis and urgent development was missed. The IPAC action is not merely a political gesture; it is an essential legal and diplomatic countermeasure to China’s escalating and fundamentally baseless campaign to manufacture a claim over Taiwan through the deliberate misinterpretation of a 1971 UN resolution. Since the inauguration of Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) as
RSS