The Foundation for the Advancement of Media Excellence (新聞公害防治基金會, FAME) recently released a report indicating that local news organizations make excessive use of unnamed sources. Errors of fact or heavy bias in reporting misled readers and were not beneficial to rational public discussion of issues, it said. These actions, the report said, have damaged the credibility of media organizations and are not in the least beneficial to reviving the fortunes of the nation's newspaper sector.
The foundation's most recent study was based on an analysis of news reports on two stories: one on the temporary bridge at the Hsuehshan Tunnel constructed for an inspection tour of the project by President Chen Shui-bian (
Five criteria were applied in the analysis: sources, fact checking, balanced reporting, composition and media responsibility. This was the 12th such study conducted by the foundation in the three years since it was founded.
The newspaper that fared best in the study was the Taiwan Daily, which maintained a reasonable level in all five categories. It was followed by the Liberty Times and the United Evening News, which also performed reasonably well. The two newspapers which performed worst were the United Daily News and the Apple Daily. The Apple Daily has repeatedly taken last place in the foundation's studies, a clear indication that despite its strong distribution figures, its reporting a simply not up to standard.
Vagueness in attributing information was a fault found in almost all the newspapers. In order to boost sales, newspapers now favor investigative reports, but they lack stringent requirements for checking facts, and stories often degenerate into purely fabricated accusations that infringe on human rights and cause grievous damage to the reputation of individuals. Moreover, the media easily lends itself to being used as a channel for the broadcasting of rumors by people with their own agendas, with the result that its credibility has been seriously undermined.
The editor's handbook circulated by the New York Times states that the best source is one that can be attributed by name. It strictly regulates the use of sources that cannot be named, and apart from demanding that facts be carefully checked, any statements that seem accusatory or biased, personal attacks and derogatory terms, are all given close scrutiny and often removed.
A false report by the BBC at the beginning of last year using an unnamed source led to the resignation of the broadcaster's chairman. The newspaper with the largest circulation in the US, USA Today, also published a false report based on an unnamed source last year, which led to a change of the paper's chief editor. A Newsweek report about the desecration of the Koran at the Guantanamo Bay detention facility led to a number of deaths, and after the report was retracted the magazine adopted even more stringent guidelines in regard to stories based on anonymous sources.
While Taiwan's media have gotten a taste for investigative journalism, they have not learned to apply professional ethics. Instead, they have turned their back on the principles of truth and fair presentation in their reporting. Only if a report is based on fact and has undergone rigorous checking can it be considered responsible journalism. As A.M. Rosenthal, a former chief editor of the New York Times, once said, news is not a license to lie and cheat.
Lu Shih-hsiang is the CEO of the Foundation for the Advancement of Media Excellence.
Translated by Ian Bartholomew
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
RSS