The Foundation for the Advancement of Media Excellence (新聞公害防治基金會, FAME) recently released a report indicating that local news organizations make excessive use of unnamed sources. Errors of fact or heavy bias in reporting misled readers and were not beneficial to rational public discussion of issues, it said. These actions, the report said, have damaged the credibility of media organizations and are not in the least beneficial to reviving the fortunes of the nation's newspaper sector.
The foundation's most recent study was based on an analysis of news reports on two stories: one on the temporary bridge at the Hsuehshan Tunnel constructed for an inspection tour of the project by President Chen Shui-bian (
Five criteria were applied in the analysis: sources, fact checking, balanced reporting, composition and media responsibility. This was the 12th such study conducted by the foundation in the three years since it was founded.
The newspaper that fared best in the study was the Taiwan Daily, which maintained a reasonable level in all five categories. It was followed by the Liberty Times and the United Evening News, which also performed reasonably well. The two newspapers which performed worst were the United Daily News and the Apple Daily. The Apple Daily has repeatedly taken last place in the foundation's studies, a clear indication that despite its strong distribution figures, its reporting a simply not up to standard.
Vagueness in attributing information was a fault found in almost all the newspapers. In order to boost sales, newspapers now favor investigative reports, but they lack stringent requirements for checking facts, and stories often degenerate into purely fabricated accusations that infringe on human rights and cause grievous damage to the reputation of individuals. Moreover, the media easily lends itself to being used as a channel for the broadcasting of rumors by people with their own agendas, with the result that its credibility has been seriously undermined.
The editor's handbook circulated by the New York Times states that the best source is one that can be attributed by name. It strictly regulates the use of sources that cannot be named, and apart from demanding that facts be carefully checked, any statements that seem accusatory or biased, personal attacks and derogatory terms, are all given close scrutiny and often removed.
A false report by the BBC at the beginning of last year using an unnamed source led to the resignation of the broadcaster's chairman. The newspaper with the largest circulation in the US, USA Today, also published a false report based on an unnamed source last year, which led to a change of the paper's chief editor. A Newsweek report about the desecration of the Koran at the Guantanamo Bay detention facility led to a number of deaths, and after the report was retracted the magazine adopted even more stringent guidelines in regard to stories based on anonymous sources.
While Taiwan's media have gotten a taste for investigative journalism, they have not learned to apply professional ethics. Instead, they have turned their back on the principles of truth and fair presentation in their reporting. Only if a report is based on fact and has undergone rigorous checking can it be considered responsible journalism. As A.M. Rosenthal, a former chief editor of the New York Times, once said, news is not a license to lie and cheat.
Lu Shih-hsiang is the CEO of the Foundation for the Advancement of Media Excellence.
Translated by Ian Bartholomew
The White House’s decision to take a 9.9 percent stake in Intel Corp is looking like very shrewd business indeed. Since the government bought in at US$20.47 a share last August, the US chipmaker’s surging stock price has delivered the US a US$43 billion return. One of the reasons the investment has so far proved so sound is that the White House has made sure of it. According to The Wall Street Journal, Howard personally pushed deals on Intel’s behalf with some of the most lucrative clients imaginable. They include Nvidia Corp, the company at the heart of the AI
A single photograph can cut through a lot of noise, but it can also be used to misrepresent the truth. At the very least, it can concentrate the mind on something that requires further investigation. On Monday last week, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation CEO Tai Hsia-ling (戴遐齡) and former National Security Council secretary-general King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) held a news conference in which they showed a photograph of former foundation CEO Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑), now Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) deputy chairman. In the image Hsiao is seated next to Xiamen Taiwan Businessmen Association chairman Han Ying-huan (韓螢煥). The two men were holding
I first met Professor Ray Jiing (井迎瑞) as a film and documentary student at Shih Hsin University’s (SHU) Department of Radio Television and Film in 1988. The following year, he went on to become the director of the Chinese Taipei Film Archive — forerunner of the Taiwan Film and Audiovisual Institute (TFAI). Over his eight-year tenure, Jiing rescued and restored over 200 classic Taiwanese films. In 1997, he established the Graduate Institute of Studies in Documentary and Film Archiving at Tainan National University of the Arts (TNNUA), and I joined the program in his third cohort of students. Beyond a
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the
RSS