The Foundation for the Advancement of Media Excellence (新聞公害防治基金會, FAME) recently released a report indicating that local news organizations make excessive use of unnamed sources. Errors of fact or heavy bias in reporting misled readers and were not beneficial to rational public discussion of issues, it said. These actions, the report said, have damaged the credibility of media organizations and are not in the least beneficial to reviving the fortunes of the nation's newspaper sector.
The foundation's most recent study was based on an analysis of news reports on two stories: one on the temporary bridge at the Hsuehshan Tunnel constructed for an inspection tour of the project by President Chen Shui-bian (
Five criteria were applied in the analysis: sources, fact checking, balanced reporting, composition and media responsibility. This was the 12th such study conducted by the foundation in the three years since it was founded.
The newspaper that fared best in the study was the Taiwan Daily, which maintained a reasonable level in all five categories. It was followed by the Liberty Times and the United Evening News, which also performed reasonably well. The two newspapers which performed worst were the United Daily News and the Apple Daily. The Apple Daily has repeatedly taken last place in the foundation's studies, a clear indication that despite its strong distribution figures, its reporting a simply not up to standard.
Vagueness in attributing information was a fault found in almost all the newspapers. In order to boost sales, newspapers now favor investigative reports, but they lack stringent requirements for checking facts, and stories often degenerate into purely fabricated accusations that infringe on human rights and cause grievous damage to the reputation of individuals. Moreover, the media easily lends itself to being used as a channel for the broadcasting of rumors by people with their own agendas, with the result that its credibility has been seriously undermined.
The editor's handbook circulated by the New York Times states that the best source is one that can be attributed by name. It strictly regulates the use of sources that cannot be named, and apart from demanding that facts be carefully checked, any statements that seem accusatory or biased, personal attacks and derogatory terms, are all given close scrutiny and often removed.
A false report by the BBC at the beginning of last year using an unnamed source led to the resignation of the broadcaster's chairman. The newspaper with the largest circulation in the US, USA Today, also published a false report based on an unnamed source last year, which led to a change of the paper's chief editor. A Newsweek report about the desecration of the Koran at the Guantanamo Bay detention facility led to a number of deaths, and after the report was retracted the magazine adopted even more stringent guidelines in regard to stories based on anonymous sources.
While Taiwan's media have gotten a taste for investigative journalism, they have not learned to apply professional ethics. Instead, they have turned their back on the principles of truth and fair presentation in their reporting. Only if a report is based on fact and has undergone rigorous checking can it be considered responsible journalism. As A.M. Rosenthal, a former chief editor of the New York Times, once said, news is not a license to lie and cheat.
Lu Shih-hsiang is the CEO of the Foundation for the Advancement of Media Excellence.
Translated by Ian Bartholomew
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
RSS