Indian analysts said on Sunday the blasts that killed at least 62 people in New Delhi were a blunt message from Islamist guerrillas in Pakistan that the Kashmir earthquake had not put them out of commission.
"It is a calling card from terrorists in [Pakistan-administered] Kashmir that while the earthquake may have killed 54,000 civilians and 2,000 or 3,000 guerrillas, they are very much in business," said Kapil Kak, director of the independent Institute of Strategic and International Studies think tank.
Kak blamed Saturday's three blasts on the Lashkar-e-Taiba guerrilla group which is fighting Indian forces in disputed Kashmir, the scenic Himalayan region which bore the brunt of the Oct. 8 quake.
"The Jamat-ud-Dawa is the political arm of Lashkar and it has emerged as a major element in extending relief to the quake victims and hence getting greater legitimacy in Pakistani Kashmir," Kak said.
"Lashkar, too, wants its presence felt," he said.
The blasts, in busy marketplaces and a bus, came hours before India and Pakistan announced plans to set up five relief centers at their militarized ceasefire line in divided Kashmir to help speed aid to quake victims.
A.K. Verma, a former chief of the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW), India's powerful external intelligence agency, warned of more possible attacks.
"This is a continuing manifestation of a continued program chalked out by Islamist ideologues who believe they must establish Islamic dominance where large Muslim populations live, which includes South Asia," he said.
"They want to convey a message -- and this conflict they are imposing on others is going to be very durable," he said.
"I think [it] is increasing in strength if one sees the attacks ranging from Bali in Indonesia to the metro bombings in London" in July, Verma said.
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has blamed "terrorists" for the attacks.
"I condemn the cynical and premeditated attacks on innocent people. These are dastardly acts of terrorism aimed at the people of India," Singh said.
"These terrorists wish to spread a sense of fear and suspicion among peace loving people. The blasts have been timed to create disaffection during the festive season," he said.
The Pakistani government expressed its condolences and denounced the attacks as "criminal."
S.D. Muni, a strategic affairs expert at New Delhi's Jawaharlal Nehru University, said the peace process between the South Asian rivals has not gone down well with hardline elements in the ruling establishment in Islamabad.
"We don't think the either the intelligence agencies or the militant establishment in Pakistan has been zapped by the massive earthquake which has caused untold suffering to millions of people," Muni said.
"They are working in [Pakistan-administered] Kashmir and re-creating the cells," said Muni, who added that he himself had only narrowly missed the blast in the middle-class Sarojini Nagar market.
"These are the elements who want to vitiate the Indo-Pak initiatives -- which is an irony, as on one hand the two sides are making peace overtures while on the sidelines, part of the Pakistani establishment is bent on derailing this process," Muni said.
Mainly Muslim Kashmir was divided between Pakistan and India after the bloody partition of the sub-continent following independence in 1947. The two countries have fought two of their three wars over Kashmir.
Complicating the situation further is an anti-Indian Islamic insurgency in Kashmir which has been raging since 1989 at a cost of tens of thousands of lives.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
RSS