China's rise and collapse are quite different propositions, but curiously enough they can be approached as two sides of the same coin. This is neither unusual nor unique to our times.
After Mao Zedong (毛澤東) took power in 1949, closing China behind the iron curtain, blood flowed in rivers and the Chinese were put through hell. Nevertheless, he has found an audience and acclaim in the free world.
Belgian author Pierre Ryckmans made a trip through China in 1972, and when he returned he wrote a series of books about his experiences. He assumed the pen name of Simon Leys, as he feared the authorities would not let him back into the country after they were published. The book titles alone, The Chairman's New Clothes, Chinese Shadows and Broken Images, suggest his critical attitude. But despite the truths he revealed, he failed to stem the tide of adherents to Maoist thought in the West.
Even today, we are seeing a repeat of Mao's era under former and current presidents Jiang Zemin (江澤民) and Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) -- with their lies issued by officialdom and truth wrapped up in fabrication. There is, however, a difference, and this lies in the fact that Mao prevented what was happening in China from getting out, and stopped the outside world from influencing what was happening internally.
Nowadays, the communists are walking the capitalist road, using cheap labor as their bargaining chip, their huge market as bait, and practicing a Leninist strategy of allowing the capitalists to sell them the rope with which they will hang them. Under the auspices of "revolution" and "liberation," the systematic hypocrisies being spouted in China today don't hold water as well as they did back in Mao's time.
China's strength derives from her economic miracle, and so most appraisals of her potential rise or collapse are based on economics. However, if we widen our scope a little, the economy may merely be the fuse behind overall collapse, with political, social and cultural implosion as the more important issue.
In Alexis de Tocqueville's The Old Regime and the Revolution, one sees similarities between pre-revolutionary France and China today. Some of the following ideas from this book should suffice to demonstrate this.
First, revolutions don't necessarily break out under worsening situations. As laws are relaxed, the people who are formerly oppressed rise up.
Second, the most dangerous time for despotic governments is periods of political reform.
Third, when the people are suppressed, they can see no way out. All it takes is for someone to stand up and make his or her voice heard, and the people will no longer accept their situation.
Fourth, when certain injustices are removed, people become aware of other injustices that are still prevalent, and this will rile them. Their awareness will become all the more keen the better their conditions are.
Fifth, prosperity stirs up the desire for accumulation of more property and wealth in the minds of the populace.
Sixth, people want to invest and amass wealth, and to run their own businesses. With increased access to the media, they are no longer prepared to accept the hardships they would have borne 30 years ago.
Seventh, 20 years ago people felt no hope for the future: Nowadays they are no longer intimidated by the future.
Finally, on the one hand people are becoming more prosperous and hungrier for wealth, while on the other their efforts are being both encouraged and interfered with. This will lead to self-destruction.
So China's collapse does not appear so groundless. The problem Taiwan faces is how to deal with the aftermath.
Chin Heng-wei is editor-in-chief of Contemporary Monthly.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Keelung Mayor George Hsieh (謝國樑) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on Tuesday last week apologized over allegations that the former director of the city’s Civil Affairs Department had illegally accessed citizens’ data to assist the KMT in its campaign to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) councilors. Given the public discontent with opposition lawmakers’ disruptive behavior in the legislature, passage of unconstitutional legislation and slashing of the central government’s budget, civic groups have launched a massive campaign to recall KMT lawmakers. The KMT has tried to fight back by initiating campaigns to recall DPP lawmakers, but the petition documents they