The Mainland Affairs Council's recent decision to temporarily ban reporters from China's state-run Xinhua News Agency and People's Daily has sparked a storm of derision from the pan-blue media. They have criticized the council for taking a regressive step for the nation's democracy. The two media outlets were reluctant to be outdone by their pan-blue soulmates and accused the government of obstructing cross-strait media exchanges. The council's decision need not be discussed here, but an old joke from the Cold War sums up the situation nicely.
The joke goes: an American and a Russian are having an argument over whose country is more liberal. "In America, we can stand in front of the White House and call President Reagan a bastard," the American says proudly. "That is nothing," the Russian responds, "in the Soviet Union we can also stand in front of the Kremlin and call Reagan a bastard."
The Cold War is no more, but the joke is still as pertinent as ever, for the Soviet Union has simply been replaced by China.
Following this line of reasoning, China may well be the world's freest country. Its media are free to criticize any world leader and President Chen Shui-bian (
A demonstration against Japan is patriotic, but one aimed at the government is a revolt: this is freedom with Chinese characteristics. It is the same with the media. Its role is to act as a weapon in the hands of the Chinese leadership, to praise political orders and attack dissent. Strong countries like the US or Japan can easily laugh off China's inferior weapons, but how can Taiwan, which has suffered for so long from Beijing's threats, allow it to deploy its human weapons on Taiwan's soil?
Currently, the pan-blue media are making much of "freedom of the press," much in the same way as the pre-World War II British government allowed Nazi media to station reporters in the UK, believing that news exchange would promote mutual understanding. But the idea that this would plant the seeds of democracy in Germany was naive and ridiculous. The way to deal with the Nazi regime was to destroy it, not to reform it.
Taiwan has only recently left the authoritarian era, and the memory of the media controls during that era is still vivid. Perhaps one should ask the pan-blue media whether their reporters were reformed by American democracy when stationed in the US, and whether they were able to publish professional and objective reports on US public opinion.
We hope that the council's decision to temporarily close the offices of the two Chinese media outlets will serve as a wake-up call to Chinese reporters, and that it will lead to some soul-searching. If it does, the council will have helped the progress of media freedom in China. If not, Chinese correspondents may continue to serve as if they are frontline troops in China's united front -- but not here.
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
RSS