China's national soccer team lost by a score of 3 to 1 to the Japanese team in the Asian Cup final in Beijing on Aug. 7. For the increasing number of ultra-nationalistic Chinese, losing the championship at home to the hated Japanese was simply unbearable.
During the game, Chinese fans shouted -- among other insulting chants -- "Kill! Kill! Kill!" After the game, they burned Japanese flags, pelted the Japanese team bus with bottles, and pounded a limousine carrying a Japanese embassy official.
The bitter collective memory of Japan's invasion of China and the brutality of its soldiers during the war certainly has contributed to a prolonged anti-Japanese sentiment over the years. The unwillingness of the Japanese government to "sincerely apologize" for the wrong the Japanese did to China has not helped either.
For its own political purposes, Beijing has also helped to encourage anti-foreign sentiment in recent years. Now that China is rising as a major military and economic power, the nationalistic Chinese appear to feel justified in expressing a high level of pride and emotion. They have come to denigrate their major Asian rival as "little Japan."
Chinese ultra-nationalists show no sign of ending their anti-foreign sentiment. In addition to venting their anger against Team Japan, the Chinese fans showed their lack of sportsmanship by jeering other teams that Team China faced throughout the Asian Cup tournament. If not managed properly, the situation will get worse when time comes for the 2008 summer Olympics to open in Beijing.
For China, the stakes will be high indeed. The Chinese government will without doubt continue to prepare Chinese athletes to win as many medals as possible. According to a newspaper report, there are about 4,000 state-sponsored sports schools training young Chinese to compete for the 2008 games and 17,000 are currently in this Chinese elite athlete training system. Beijing is clearly determined to make China a sports superpower rivaling the US and Russia.
The Chinese sports fans' expectations for medals will be sky-high. It is therefore not difficult to predict how the nationalistic Chinese will behave in Beijing in the summer of 2008 when their athletes come up against those of other countries, particularly those that the Chinese believe have wronged their country in the past.
They do not forget their so-called "century of humiliation," when China suffered at the hands of the intruding foreign powers from the mid-19th to the mid-20th centuries.
Molded by their government's nationalist education and propaganda, the Chinese firmly believe that Russia stole much of Siberia from Manchu China in the late 17th and early 18th centuries, that England cheated Manchu China economically and wrested Hong Kong from it after defeating the declining Manchu dynasty in the "Opium War" of late 1830s, and that France joined England in attacking North China in late 1850s.
Japan forced the Manchu dynasty to cede Taiwan after dealing Manchu China a humiliating military defeat in 1895 and that the US joined seven other countries, including those named above as well as Germany, Italy and Austria-Hungary in invading Beijing in 1900 during the so-called "Boxer Rebellion."
To the ultra-nationalistic Chinese who blame their country's ills and weaknesses on others, the list of offending nations is long. And the time will come for China to get even with each and every culprit. However, the US will doubtlessly be the biggest target of irrational Chinese sports fans' ire in the 2008 Olympic Summer Game in Beijing -- for its role in the Korean War, its failure to recognize China until 1979, its arms sales to Taiwan and alleged support for Taiwan's "creeping independence" and its continuing efforts to "contain" China.
After the Asian Cup final, many international authorities, sports and otherwise, have expressed concern that the ugly and immature behavior that the fanatical Chinese exhibited against the Japanese will be repeated if Beijing does not strive to educate their people on the importance of sportsmanship.
Let's hope that the Beijing authorities have learned from the Asian Cup experience and will be prepared to uphold the spirit of the Olympics, and to provide safety to all international athletes and foreign visitors when the 2008 Olympic games begin. The stakes involve more than just the number of medals won -- China's reputation as a member of the civilized international community will also be on the line.
Chen Ching-chih is professor emeritus of history at Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville and a research fellow at the Los Angeles-based Institute for Taiwanese Studies.
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
Taiwan People’s Party Legislator-at-large Liu Shu-pin (劉書彬) asked Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) a question on Tuesday last week about President William Lai’s (賴清德) decision in March to officially define the People’s Republic of China (PRC), as governed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), as a foreign hostile force. Liu objected to Lai’s decision on two grounds. First, procedurally, suggesting that Lai did not have the right to unilaterally make that decision, and that Cho should have consulted with the Executive Yuan before he endorsed it. Second, Liu objected over national security concerns, saying that the CCP and Chinese President Xi
RSS