Should we enlist former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein's former generals in combating the insurgency in Iraq? That vexing question is at the heart of an article in the New York Times Magazine regarding the pacification of Sunni insurgents in Fallujah, "The Re-Baathification of Fallujah."
"Through all this runs the difficult issue of lustration," wrote the political analyst Michael Barone in US News & World Report, helpfully adding a definition to the unfamiliar word, "how and whether to bar from power personnel of an ousted evil regime."
Tina Rosenberg, in her 1995 book, The Haunted Land, wrote: "In Czechoslovakia, I found the lustrace [pronounced lus-TRAH-tzay] law, which has become the single most controversial law passed anywhere in the former Soviet bloc to deal with the past. It bars from top government jobs those who held certain positions under communism or whose names appear in the secret police's register of informants."
A natural urge in newly freed countries is to wreak vengeance on, or at least deny continued privileges to, the oppressors of the previous regime. But the Times noted in 1992 that "Under lustration ... the determination of guilt is collective and the presumption of innocence reversed."
The word comes from the Latin lustrum, "a purifying sacrifice," which was carried out every five years in imperial Rome. As the columnist Barone notes, it will be one of the controversies facing the new government of Iraq: "On the one hand, you don't want to reward tyrants with power; on the other, you'd like to see the trains run on time ... There is no entirely satisfactory way to handle lustration."
KIDNAPPING
Remember when "rendition" was a cheerful word meaning "performance," like a version of Auld Lang Syne as played by Guy Lombardo? (Because I heard this bandleader's name on the radio more often than I saw it in print, for years I thought his first name was Guylom.)
The British novelist Nicholas Monsarrat wrote in 1939: "No account of 20th-century culture would be complete without reference to the impact of the dance-band world ... as well as strange words and phrases like `rendition.'"
Long before that, in Elizabethan times, rendition meant "surrender" of a garrison or a prisoner.
Lawyers later used it as the noun form for the rendering, or giving out, of a verdict.
Then came "extraordinary rendition."
"We started using that term in the late 1970s," recalls the former New York City police commissioner Howard Safir (no relation), who was then with the US Marshals Service. "It's when we would go overseas and kidnap fugitives and bring them back to the US. We called it extraordinary rendition because, although it was legal under US law, it was not always legal under the law of the country in which the fugitive was residing."
In 1992, Safir defined the term more vividly to a House subcommittee; after extradition attempts fail, extraordinary rendition could range from luring a fugitive to a friendly country or "an outright snatch."
When the locution traveled from the Justice Department to the CIA, its meaning -- at least to outsiders -- changed from kidnapping to something even more sinister. This year, The Associated Press defined it as "the covert practice of expelling suspects to countries known to use torture to extract information."
The CIA disputes this, arguing that "rendition" means the transfer of a suspect to a nation where interrogators speak the captive's dialect and can develop cultural intimacy. George Tenet, the departing CIA chief, told the Sept. 11 commission that "disruptions, renditions and sensitive collection activities no doubt saved lives."
BOGUS TITLES
A bogus title is a phrase like "consumer advocate" or "fugitive financier" or "domestic diva." The one that has been applied to US Senator John Kerry is presumptive nominee.
But wait -- here is Jodi Wilgoren, who covers the Kerry campaign for the Times, referring to Kerry as "the presumed Democratic presidential nominee." This was not the result of a style diktat from on high, but her own courageous decision.
On Google, when Kerry is mentioned, "presumptive" is used 30 times more often than "presumed". Was the reporter right? Is there a difference between "presumptive" and "presumed"?
I turn to two lexicographic giants. Fred Mish, retired editor in chief of Merriam-Webster, finds that "`presumed' by itself as
an adjective just means `supposed' or `assumed' and really nothing more. `Presumptive' has a whole range of meanings in law and in science. The biggest thing that separates `presumed from `presumptive' is that `presumptive' tends to carry with it a suggestion of reasonableness. This comes out in the second sense in the 11th Collegiate: `giving grounds for reasonable opinion or belief.' `Presumed' straightforwardly states the fact that an assumption is being made, whereas `presumptive' suggests in similar contexts that the assumption is a reasonable one to make." Nice distinction.
Here's Joe Pickett, executive editor of the American Heritage dictionary: "`Presumptive nominee' owes some of its flavor to the phrase `presumptive heir,' which is used in contrast to `heir apparent.' The presumptive heir is one who is indirectly in line to the throne and will ascend only in the absence of a direct heir.
This means that there is some connotation of secondary legitimacy. The much lower frequency of this phrase in regard to [US President George W.] Bush implies that Bush is first in line, is the legitimate heir to the nomination of his party, whereas Kerry for some reason is not."
"`Presumptive' may also bear the connotation of presumptuous," notes Pickett, "which was actually an earlier meaning of the word, and the similarity in sound would tend to darken the meaning of `presumptive'. Taint by association."
I intend to give Kerry a break and call him the presumed nominee.
As Mish puts it plainly: "`Presumptive' is a stinker of a word."
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
RSS