The damage from degrading images of US soldiers abusing naked Iraqi prisoners will be indelible, incalculable and a priceless gift to Osama bin Laden, analysts said on Monday.
Anger and indignation rippled across the Arab world at the photos and the reaction was almost unanimous. What people saw, they said, was the true image of the occupation, debasement of an occupied people, contempt for Islam, sadism and racism.
Lebanon's top Shiite Muslim cleric, Ayatollah Mohammad Hussein Fadlallah, said that Washington will fail to whitewash its "abhorrent image in the Middle East" after the scandal.
ILLUSTRATION: YU SHA
"Fire rages in the hearts of these Americans and hatred spews from their mouths. What their hearts hide is even greater," Muslim Brotherhood leader Mohamed Mehdi Akef said.
"The pictures reinforce the sense of racism and decadence, of what Americans have done to American-Indians -- the cruelty, savagery and complete disrespect for human life," said Mohamed al-Sayed Said of Egypt's al-Ahram Center for Political Studies.
Arabs across the political spectrum feel whatever President George W. Bush's administration does to try to make amends will not erase a bitter and enduring legacy.
The images of uniformed women and male soldiers cheerfully brutalizing prisoners in the most humiliating manner will linger for decades.
"In Islam, sodomy is something that cannot be tolerated, sexual abuse is a gross assault, the gravest form of degradation and a violation of the Koran. There is nothing worse," said Abdel-Bari Atwan, editor of al-Quds Al Arabi daily.
"The Americans trampled on anything called human dignity. They are reviving the culture of slavery," he said.
Victory for bin Laden
No one is likely to rejoice more than bin Laden at the outrage and uproar caused by the images, with one chilling photo showing a female soldier dragging a naked man on a dog's leash.
These abuses, analysts say, will be seized on by the leader of al Qaeda as triumphant confirmation that America has launched a "crusade" in Iraq to destroy Muslim dignity and identity.
"This is the best recruiting campaign for bin Laden and al Qaeda," Atwan said. "Honestly, this by itself could instigate a holy war against the Americans."
"This will justify for Muslims the attacks against Americans and Westerners inside the Arab and Muslim world and outside," he said.
Pro-Western Arabs who placed faith in Washington and its stated intention to advance democracy in the Middle East feel betrayed and demoralized.
"Any human being if he has any humanity in him will be sad, outraged and depressed at these images," said Saudi scholar Sami Angawi. "It will add oil to the fire. Bin Laden will exploit it."
Arabs said the scandal made a mockery of yearly US reports on countries violating human rights and using torture.
The disturbing images, played over and over again on Arab satellite channels and splashed over newspapers, dealt a new blow to Washington not only politically but to its moral model of democracy in the eyes of Arabs and the world, analysts said.
Anger at Washington, long perceived as an ally of Israel and a backer of autocratic Arab rulers, reached a boiling point over the US war on Iraq, and Bush's endorsement of Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's plan to retain parts of the West Bank.
Official Arab silence
Bin Laden has called for holy war to end the "blatant US occupation", saying America has "utter contempt for Islam" and that the conflict is religious and between the West and Islam.
Adding to popular Arab outrage is the near uniform silence of their leaders, few of whom even alluded to the abuse at Abu Ghraib prison, notorious for torture under former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein.
Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Maher said Washington should punish those found guilty but President Hosni Mubarak has not mentioned the abuse. Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal said it was "the result of the occupation."
Analysts say this near-silence is unsurprising given Arab leaders' own record of torture of tens of thousands of their political dissidents from Egypt to Algeria.
"There is an Arab proverb that says: `If your house is made of glass you don't throw stones at others,'" said one Gulf commentator. "Arab leaders are not shocked, this is normal for what they themselves do to their people."
Stung by the photographs, Bush pledged to punish the soldiers and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld offered his "deepest apology." The first of seven US soldiers charged faces a public court martial in Baghdad this month.
But many Arabs said anything short of a drastic shift in US policy and the sacking of Rumsfeld would not be enough to appease indignation, and even then there were no guarantees.
"When an official in Europe or the United States has an affair he will be forced to resign. Imagine with this indecent assault on Iraqis and Islam, nobody is resigning. Neither Bush nor Rumsfeld are being forced to resign," Atwan said.
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Last week, Nvidia chief executive officer Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) unveiled the location of Nvidia’s new Taipei headquarters and announced plans to build the world’s first large-scale artificial intelligence (AI) supercomputer in Taiwan. In Taipei, Huang’s announcement was welcomed as a milestone for Taiwan’s tech industry. However, beneath the excitement lies a significant question: Can Taiwan’s electricity infrastructure, especially its renewable energy supply, keep up with growing demand from AI chipmaking? Despite its leadership in digital hardware, Taiwan lags behind in renewable energy adoption. Moreover, the electricity grid is already experiencing supply shortages. As Taiwan’s role in AI manufacturing expands, it is critical that