Kung Ling-yi (
Upon receiving this message, the Presidential Office expressed its respect for the relatives' arrangements and said the government would extend full support. The office also said that it had decided to accord state mourning for the former first lady.
What is interesting is that Chiang Fang Chih-yi (
There are no blood relations between Soong and Chiang Fang. Although Chiang Fang's statement was improper, at least she, as a member of Soong's in-laws, belongs to her family.
It is hilarious that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator John Chang (
Although Chang has managed to get Chiang Ching-kuo listed as his father on his ID card, he is still not accepted by the Chiang family. Therefore, anything about the "family" has nothing to do with him. He can neither participate in family discussions nor speak for them.
And this is still not the point. The point is: the Kungs' invitation for Chen to drape the flag over the coffin falls in line with the country's protocols and regulations. But Chiang Fang and Chang placed their "private domain" above the "public domain," exposing the pan-blue camp's mindset of refusing to recognize the DPP government or Chen.
They should understand that the person to drape the flag would be the president. Whether he is a DPP or TSU member should not be something that Soong or the Kungs find worrying.
Having lived in the US, Kung and her husband apparently understand the essence of a democratic society and its institutions. Just like the fact that George W. Bush is the US president -- no matter how much you dislike the Republican Party.
To be frank, Soong Mayling was closer to the Kung and Soong families than the Chiangs. She spent her latter years in New York. She was accompanied by the Kungs and Soongs, but not anyone from the Chiang family. Only the Kungs have the power to make the final decision whether she will be buried in the family cemetery in New York, rather than in Taipei as is the wish of the Chiang family.
Chin Heng-wei is editor-in-chief of Contemporary Monthly magazine.
Translated by Jackie Lin
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS