Soon after the Education Reconstruction Front submitted a 10,000-word petition, the Ministry of Education announced that it will allow the nation's 2,600 or so elementary schools to launch after-school programs this fall. The timing of this announcement was abrupt.
In response to the petition's call for the government to "review the decade-long education reform and terminate the chaos of reform," the ministry scheduled a national education-development conference for next month. But it suddenly announced this major policy without thorough planning.
Due to its rough methods, the ministry may suffer again -- as it did in the cases of the Nine-Year Education Program or the Diversified Enrollment Scheme -- because the excessively idealistic ministry has ignored the realities of society and lacks appropriate complementary measures.
Supplementary-education businesses have been seriously affected by the chaos of reform. Operators have found it difficult to stay in businesses because of the government's ignorance and society's defamation of the industry. The number of legal cram schools has increased about 5.8 times over the past 10 years. But the number of students who attend these schools has decreased almost 30 percent, while the number of elementary-school graduates per year has decreased almost 20 percent.
In addition, in the face of the economic downturn, the average annual income has shrunk to the level of seven years ago. This has forced cram schools to reduce their fees. Unfortunately, pressured by the Peng Wan-ru Foundation, not only has the ministry failed to manage cram schools, but it has allowed students to take extra classes at their schools. The ministry is to be blamed if cram schools are forced to close down.
Some women's groups have recently demanded the government return "options for education" to them. But these groups are in fact helping the foundation to monopolize the market for after-school business. Many of those women's group representatives also serve on the Cabi-net's Commission on Women's Rights Promotion (
I propose four solutions:
First, the law states that all after-school affairs must be supervised by social-welfare agencies and can only be provided by qualified child-care givers. The law requires all child-care givers have to taken a 540-hour training program. The government should not reduce the length of the program to 102 hours.
Second, the ministry should postpone its after-school policy since necessary complementary measures are lacking. After next month's conference, education experts and authorities, as well as our teachers and parents, are likely to reach a consensus on various issues related to primary education -- such as the application of "constructive mathe-matics," the de-standardization of both elementary and junior-high textbooks and the integration of different education systems. The ministry should start to promote the new after-school policy at that time.
Third, the ministry should acknowledge the supplementary education operators' contributions to the "informal education system." It should also classify them as a "supplementary education industry" and help them to transform and upgrade.
Finally, the ministry should carefully stipulate related regulations. Once the programs are launched, the ministry should examine the implementation of these programs thoroughly. It should uphold the principle of "separation of regular and supplementary education" and therefore maintain social justice.
William Hsieh is the chief executive officer of the Taiwan Supplementary Education Association. TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
RSS