In game theory, there is a very famous "median voter theorem." It means that a candidate's campaign strategies will tend to lean toward the center in a two-sided election campaign. Whoever can stand firmly on the center can get more voter support and win.
In Taiwan, middle-of-the-road voters, or median voters, have become a crucial factor in winning single-seat elections. This group of people can swing the campaign results and determine the winner. They have no preference for any particular party. They are above ideology, highly independent and driven by campaign platforms and performance in office. They are dispassionate and do not blindly follow the crowd. They can think rationally and make discreet judgements.
When the voter bases of the blue and green camps are stable and even, these median voters will become the arbitrators that determine the outcome, thereby becoming the representatives of mainstream public opinion.
There is a considerable gap between median voters as interpreted by the media in Taiwan and the original meaning of the median-voter theorem. Usage of the median-voter concept is quite abstract and divergent. There is no strict, commonly accepted definition. When using the term, some members of the media frequently mix it up with "independent" or "undecided" voters.
Independent voters means voters who have no preference for any particular party. In Taiwan, such voters account for 30 percent to 40 percent of the electorate, according to opinion polls. Undecided voters are those who say, in opinion surveys, that they have not decided who to vote for.
Apparently, independent voters are not exactly the same as median voters. Independent voters account for a far larger proportion than median voters. In the media's description, median voters seem to account for only 10 percent to 20 percent of the electorate, numbering 1 million-plus votes. Independent voters merely means those who have no partisan preference. Many may be strongly candidate-oriented. But it does not necessarily follow that they are staunch supporters of a political party.
Nor are undecided voters necessarily the same as median voters. Voters who respond to telephone surveys by saying that they have not decided who to vote for may in fact be a highly complex combination of voters. Some of them may have long had a preference that they do not want to reveal. Some others may be floating voters who will support whichever side gains momentum in the end. Still others may be voters waiting to be mobilized by vote captains. They may remain undecided because they have not been given "walking fees" (fees to show up at rallies). Some may even be politically aloof or alienated. They may not even go out and vote at all.
After subtracting such voters, what remains is perhaps the highly independent median voters as described by the media. Can we categorize independent voters who have no partisan preferences and voters who say in telephone interviews they haven't decided who to support as median voters? We need to be careful with our interpretations.
For next year's presidential election, both the blue and green camps already have fairly stable voter bases. The key to victory will be winning over those who have not made up their minds. But what kind of strategies should the parties employ?
If these median voters -- who may account for around 10 percent -- really have no partisan preferences, are above ideology, independent and driven by campaign platforms and performance, then the parties' past performance should be the most important yardstick. The parties should propose progressive platforms instead of engaging in negative campaigning in order to win.
Wang Yeh-lih is a professor of political science at Tunghai University.
Translated by Francis Huang
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS