On June 24, the World Health Organization (WHO) officially lifted its Beijing travel advisory and declared the city to be free of SARS. SARS had wreaked havoc in China for three months. How great an impact will it have on China's economic development? What does the economic future of post-SARS China look like?
The heaviest impact SARS had on the Chinese economy was on demand, or, to be more specific, on consumption. It had less of a destructive effect on the supply side. Consumer retailing increased by 9.2 percent year on year in the first quarter, 7.7 percent in April and only 4.3 percent in May. These are the lowest increases since the 1990s. SARS has not had a major impact on the manufacturing industry. Industrial added value of enterprises on the national level increased by 17.2 percent year on year in the first quarter, 14.9 percent in April and 13.7 percent in May.
The service industries are the most severely affected, including tourism, aviation, hotels and entertainment. In the transportation industry, for example, passenger numbers saw an increase of 5.3 percent year-on-year in the first quarter, but a decrease of 6.9 percent in April from the same month last year. In May, passenger traffic fell 41.5 percent from the year before. In May, business incomes in the social services industry fell by 37.4 percent year-on-year.
In particular, business incomes fell by 65.1 percent in the hotel industry, 58.3 percent in the spa sector and 45.3 percent in the entertainment industry.
The effects of SARS on Chinese exports are so far very limited, but there will be a lag effect. Exports increased by 33.5 percent year on year in the first quarter, 33.3 percent year-on-year in April, and 37.4 percent year-on-year in May.
There are two main reasons why Chinese exports grew in April and May while thousands fell ill -- support from the government and the fact that the effect of the SARS epidemic had yet to filter through the economy.
First, the Chinese government strengthened its policy support for exports and May export tax refunds increased by 4.6 times year-on-year.
Second, the inability of many foreign businesspeople to travel to China to discuss business and foreign concerns about the epidemic's impact on goods in April and May, is having quite an effect.
At the Canton Trade Fair this year, for example, signed contracts amounted to only US$4.42 billion, a mere 26.3 percent of last year's volume. These effects will gradually make themselves felt during the third and fourth quarters, but did not affect exports during April and May.
The effects have already had an impact on foreign investment in China. Foreign investment contract value during the first quarter this year grew by 59.6 percent year-on-year, and the real amount increased by 56.7 percent. In April, foreign investment contract value grew by 27.2 percent year-on-year, and the real amount grew by 37.2 percent. In May, the figures were 17.6 percent and 39.5 percent, respectively. Even though the rate of foreign investment still grew rapidly in April and May, it was much lower than in the first quarter.
Foreign investment contracts are contracts for future investment, and current real investments are the results of past foreign investment contracts being executed. The value of foreign investment contracts signed in April and May have therefore fallen substantially, and this will affect the real amount of future foreign investment in China.
However, the signing of many foreign investment contracts may have been only delayed because of the effects of SARS and not necessarily cancelled. Many big international manufacturers have not changed their Chinese investment plans as a result of the outbreak. There may therefore also be a foreign investment lag effect -- foreign businesses may increase the speed of their Chinese investments once the SARS epidemic has come under control.
The Chinese economy grew by 8.9 percent in April, one percentage point less than the 9.9 percent during the first quarter. Growth forecasts for May are even lower. Official Chinese forecasts for GDP growth this year have fallen from 9 percent to 7.5 percent.
Forecasts of the effects of the SARS epidemic by international financial institutions are very close to official Chinese estimates. Early last month, for example, Deutsche Bank forecast that Chinese economic growth this year may exceed 7.5 percent, and in the middle of last month Morgan Stanley adjusted Chinese economic growth this year up-wards from 6.5 percent to 7.5
percent.
The SARS epidemic certainly had an impact on the Chinese economy in April and May, but it did not fundamentally destroy the foundation for China's economic development. Basically, China's economic activities had returned to normal in the middle of last month. The SARS lag-effect may cause future Chinese exports to slow a little, but it may also revive the rapid growth of foreign investment in China.
Tung Chen-yuan is an associate research fellow at National Chengchi University's Institute of International Relations.
Translated by Perry Svensson
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
RSS