More on Chen's remarks
Taiwan's media seem to have learned well from America's media. Take a statement that doesn't hold much weight by itself and make it as big an issue as possible. President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) statement "Taiwan and China on the other side, each side is a country" is a strong statement when you look at it alone, without considering the response.
The DPP's quick response was, "Unfortunately, [Chen's comments] were widely misinterpreted as calling for a change to the current status." Further the DPP's spokesperson said that Chen's comments had been "over-interpreted" by the media. This is similar to what happens in the US when President George W. Bush says something out of line with official policy. All of Bush's press relations people say he has been misinterpreted, and even go as far as to completely change the meaning of what was said.
China's response is interesting -- a statement that basically said Chen's remarks were irresponsible and a source of destabilization of cross-strait relations. They said it was bad for all Chinese people. I read Beijing's official response and there was no mention of military action, no specific threats. Last time Beijing took this kind of issue seriously they made specific military threats. This time they slapped Chen's hands like he was a bad boy who had uttered a profanity in front of his parents. They didn't take his remarks seriously.
Basically, this shows that what Chen thinks, of and by itself, has little influence on the real political and economic power holders. The DPP said he was mistaken. The opposition party said he was irresponsible. Perhaps most importantly, repre-sentatives from both parties have said he should apologize for making remarks that could create economic instability. Notice, both political camps (and China) agree on the money.
Until you see Taiwanese money and businesses pulling out of China, there's nothing to worry about. The people with the power and the money are the people who have the most to gain by maintaining the status quo.
Daniel Fernandez
Costa Mesa, California
President Chen should clarify that "one country on each side" is in essence equivalent to the status quo. What is the status quo? The status quo is that on the east side of the Taiwan Strait, there is a country named the ROC (Taiwan). On the west side, there is a country called the PRC. Each country exists as a separate political entity and sovereign state. This is the fact that Chen illustrated to the world with clear arithmetic.
In A-bian's statement, there was not a hint of agitating Taiwan independence. What the opposition parties are trying to do is simply to distort and discredit the remarks. Can the opposition parties deny the existence of the ROC or PRC? If they can't, then how many countries are there on either side of the Taiwan Strait is a very simple question. The answer is obvious and A-bian scored 100 percent, but PFP Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) and KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) scored no points. One plus one equals two. It is plain and simple.
Joshua Tin
Boonton, New Jersey
In my opinion that Chen made his pro-independence remarks because the conservatives in power are giving him private assurances of US military support in the case of any hostile Chinese military action. The US is now holding hearings in Congress about a pre-emptive military attack on Iraq, but I think it is a smoke screen for a military mobilization against the PRC. Beijing has drawn a bright line that Chen has deliberately walked over. I can't imagine Chen making such reckless remarks without US backing.
Brad Arnold
St Louis Park, Minnesota
Do the people of Taiwan ever wonder why, when the truth of Taiwan's identity is spoken, Taiwan's stock market strug-gles? First, it was President Lee Teng-hui's (李登輝) redefinition of cross-strait relations as being "state-to-state" in nature and now Chen's "one state on either side of the Taiwan Strait." It is sad when stating such truths end up hurting Taiwan and scaring its people. This sad result is because Taiwanese people live in constant fear of China, especially in recent years as Taiwan has become more and more democratic.
In the past, foreigners have determined the fate of the island. Now it is time for Taiwan's people to determine the fate of Taiwan before history repeats itself and the people of Taiwan find themselves subordinates once again.
Chen and Lee have a vision for Taiwan as the America of the East, whose people may live in freedom and peace, respected by other nations, and able to make choices for themselves without harassment from other nations. However, such dreams and visions are not free. The people of Taiwan will have to work and pay the price for this vision if they are to see it realized for their grandchildren.
Chen does not wish to see Taiwan suffer. He is aware of the price and only asks for people to have faith in him as the captain. My only hope is that the people of Taiwan do not forgo this opportunity for long-term prosperity out of fear of the short-term cost.
Lin Chung-I
Washington State
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
RSS