US President George W. Bush's visit to Beijing on the 30th anniversary of the Shanghai Com-munique inevitably brought up painful memories of Taiwan's past humiliations. The situation in Beijing may be the same as in the past, but people and the world have changed fundamentally.
Thirty years ago, Beijing was valuable as an anti-Soviet factor. Today, the Soviet Union is no more and may be substituted by China as the major strategic challenge to the US in the 21st century. Washington and Taipei are ruled by a new generation of young leaders and Beijing is facing the succession of a fourth generation of leaders. Apart from this, the mainstream trend in global politics is freedom and democracy, and China has become one of a minority of remaining communist countries.
Since 1972, the US has gradually sacrificed the interests of Taiwan in three communiques, hoping for Chinese cooperation in exchange. In the midst of a strengthening economy and military, however, Beijing continues to apply pressure on Taiwan with armed threats and a zero-sum-game attitude, while also maintaining an ambiguous attitude toward the proliferation of nuc-lear weapons and of selling sensitive technologies to countries in the "axis of evil."
In the wake of the wounds inflicted by the Sept. 11 attacks on the US, the importance of last week's visit by Bush is quite different from that of former president Richard Nixon's ice-breaking visit in 1972.
Bush's handling of the Taiwan Strait issue displays the following profound changes:
One, prior to the meeting with Chinese President Jiang Zemin (
Compare this to 1998, when former president Bill Clinton pronounced the "three nos" in Shanghai, drawing a reaction from the US Congress. Washington hurriedly sent Richard Bush to Taiwan to explain for Clinton, but the damage was already done.
Two, there is a new interpretation of "one China" and the three communiques. Even though Bush has reiterated the "one China" stance, he did not bring up "one China" and the three communiques during the joint public press conference with Jiang in Beijing. Instead, he said that the US government's view of Taiwan has remained unchanged for many years, that the US believes in the peaceful resolution of this issue, that no party should make any provocative moves and that the US will continue to support the Taiwan Relations Act.
The repeated pronouncements of this view prior to and during Bush's visit to China warrants further attention by Taiwan.
Three, the Taiwan issue -- which is the most sensitive issue in the US-China relationship -- must be approached with sincerity and open dialog. With the Shanghai Communique in 1972, Nixon used evasive and roundabout ways to lay the groundwork for the gradual evacuation of US troops stationed in Taiwan and the establishment of diplomatic ties with China.
Thirty years later, Bush stated that Taiwan is a good Pacific friend of the US and, in his speech to the Japanese Diet, pointed out that the US will support the Philippines, Thailand, South Korea and Japan, and said in public that the US will remember its commitment to the people of Taiwan.
Bush's goal with last week's trip to China was to obtain Chinese cooperation with the anti-terrorist, human rights and arms-proliferation issues, but the experience of 30 years of contact with China has finally made the US understand that compromises over the Taiwan issue will not solve the differences between the US and China.
The only way to prevent a Taiwan crisis and to solve the nuclear proliferation problem is to make the leaders in Beijing clearly understand the US resolve to defend the Taiwan Strait and conduct anti-terrorist activities and activities against countries in the "axis of evil."
Faced with the changing strategic situation at the crossroads of a new century, Taipei should actively explore ways to respond to this new situation.
Joanne J.L. Chang is a research fellow at the Institute of European and American Studies, Academia Sinica.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big