Under the Genetic Health Law (
The Department of Health is reportedly planning to amend the law to allow impartial social organizations to assist pregnant teens with problems related to pregnancy. The Taipei Association for the Promotion of Wo-men's Rights (TAPWR,
The Genetic Health Law, enacted in 1984, is a product of the population control policy of the time. The law not only aimed to control a growing population, but to promote eugenics as well. The promotion of eugenics, however, involves discrimination among human beings and is an idea that has long been rejected in the developed world.
Under the law, the termination of pregnancies is legal in cases of persons with genetic defects -- such as hereditary, infectious and psychological diseases -- in order to promote genetic health and improve the quality of the nation's population. This implies that the existence of certain people in society is inappropriate and clearly amounts to a form of oppression.
Moreover, the law tries to control women's bodies by adopting a patriarchal ideology, as it stipulates that married women must have the consent of their husbands before having abortions.
The purpose of the Genetic Health Law is to regulate birth control. It should therefore be based on the best interests of mothers and their children, not on an ideology for improving the nation's population.
The TAPWR and the Taiwan Women's League (
For its part, the government should perform the function of assisting the public, instead of interfering in -- or taking control of -- childbirth plans.
People have the right, for example, to demand that the government provide health check-ups for pregnant women, rather than to have a system where the government can force women to undergo such exams.
Instead of practicing a form of selective breeding, a government that claims to support human rights should provide sufficient information for parents so that they can have a clear understanding of the possible consequences of their actions -- such as proceeding with the delivery of a baby with congenital defects -- as well as the support resources available to them. Only with sufficient information can people possibly make their own informed decisions.
As for abortions, the proposed "mother and child health law"calls for the right to decide whether to have an abortion to be vested in the pregnant woman. Whether to give birth is certainly an issue that needs to be discussed by both parents. But who should make the final decision when the parents disagree?
Women still take most of the responsibility for nursing children. When a woman becomes pregnant, she must consider whether her family's condition or her own physical and mental condition allow for such a great responsibility. She must also consider whether she has enough resources to support the baby.
It is never easy for a woman to decide whether or not to give birth. Legalizing abortion does not mean we do not respect human life. Rather, it shows that we are trying to ensure the quality of life of each and every human being so that everyone can be well looked after.
If the Department of Health decides to amend the law it will have made a worthy decision. But it must clearly understand the changes in our society and it must show foresight in the policy it adopts. Parts of the Genetic Health Law, including the promotion of eugenics and population control, are outdated.
Facing such a serious issue, we should not focus on questions such as what kinds of people should or should not be born. Rather, we should provide people with sufficient information about the resources available to them once their children are born, helping them to understand whether their children will grow up in an environment that is suitable for them. That's how a human life is truly respected.
Hsu Chia-ching is the secretary-general of the Taiwan Women's League. Chen I-lin is the vice secretary-general of the Taipei Association for the Promotion of Women's Rights.
Translated by Eddy Chang
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Keelung Mayor George Hsieh (謝國樑) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on Tuesday last week apologized over allegations that the former director of the city’s Civil Affairs Department had illegally accessed citizens’ data to assist the KMT in its campaign to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) councilors. Given the public discontent with opposition lawmakers’ disruptive behavior in the legislature, passage of unconstitutional legislation and slashing of the central government’s budget, civic groups have launched a massive campaign to recall KMT lawmakers. The KMT has tried to fight back by initiating campaigns to recall DPP lawmakers, but the petition documents they
RSS