Under the Genetic Health Law (
The Department of Health is reportedly planning to amend the law to allow impartial social organizations to assist pregnant teens with problems related to pregnancy. The Taipei Association for the Promotion of Wo-men's Rights (TAPWR,
The Genetic Health Law, enacted in 1984, is a product of the population control policy of the time. The law not only aimed to control a growing population, but to promote eugenics as well. The promotion of eugenics, however, involves discrimination among human beings and is an idea that has long been rejected in the developed world.
Under the law, the termination of pregnancies is legal in cases of persons with genetic defects -- such as hereditary, infectious and psychological diseases -- in order to promote genetic health and improve the quality of the nation's population. This implies that the existence of certain people in society is inappropriate and clearly amounts to a form of oppression.
Moreover, the law tries to control women's bodies by adopting a patriarchal ideology, as it stipulates that married women must have the consent of their husbands before having abortions.
The purpose of the Genetic Health Law is to regulate birth control. It should therefore be based on the best interests of mothers and their children, not on an ideology for improving the nation's population.
The TAPWR and the Taiwan Women's League (
For its part, the government should perform the function of assisting the public, instead of interfering in -- or taking control of -- childbirth plans.
People have the right, for example, to demand that the government provide health check-ups for pregnant women, rather than to have a system where the government can force women to undergo such exams.
Instead of practicing a form of selective breeding, a government that claims to support human rights should provide sufficient information for parents so that they can have a clear understanding of the possible consequences of their actions -- such as proceeding with the delivery of a baby with congenital defects -- as well as the support resources available to them. Only with sufficient information can people possibly make their own informed decisions.
As for abortions, the proposed "mother and child health law"calls for the right to decide whether to have an abortion to be vested in the pregnant woman. Whether to give birth is certainly an issue that needs to be discussed by both parents. But who should make the final decision when the parents disagree?
Women still take most of the responsibility for nursing children. When a woman becomes pregnant, she must consider whether her family's condition or her own physical and mental condition allow for such a great responsibility. She must also consider whether she has enough resources to support the baby.
It is never easy for a woman to decide whether or not to give birth. Legalizing abortion does not mean we do not respect human life. Rather, it shows that we are trying to ensure the quality of life of each and every human being so that everyone can be well looked after.
If the Department of Health decides to amend the law it will have made a worthy decision. But it must clearly understand the changes in our society and it must show foresight in the policy it adopts. Parts of the Genetic Health Law, including the promotion of eugenics and population control, are outdated.
Facing such a serious issue, we should not focus on questions such as what kinds of people should or should not be born. Rather, we should provide people with sufficient information about the resources available to them once their children are born, helping them to understand whether their children will grow up in an environment that is suitable for them. That's how a human life is truly respected.
Hsu Chia-ching is the secretary-general of the Taiwan Women's League. Chen I-lin is the vice secretary-general of the Taipei Association for the Promotion of Women's Rights.
Translated by Eddy Chang
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
Last month, two major diplomatic events unfolded in Southeast Asia that suggested subtle shifts in the region’s strategic landscape. The 46th ASEAN Summit and the inaugural ASEAN-Gulf-Cooperation Council (GCC)-China Trilateral Summit in Kuala Lumpur coincided with French President Emmanuel Macron’s high-profile visits to Vietnam, Indonesia and Singapore. Together, they highlighted ASEAN’s maturing global posture, deepening regional integration and China’s intensifying efforts to recalibrate its economic diplomacy amid uncertainties posed by the US. The ASEAN summit took place amid rising protectionist policies from the US, notably sweeping tariffs on goods from Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam, with duties as high as 49 percent.
RSS