The people of Taiwan are immersed in lottery madness these days. Such euphoria can be seen everywhere and the phenomenon is reflected in the skyrocketing number of lottery tickets sold throughout the nation. The jackpot for the grand prize reached NT$136 million in only the first week of sales, marking a new high for lottery prizes in Taiwan. In this wave of lottery madness, however, we should not forget the original intent of the lottery and we should also consider its future development.
The Public Welfare Lottery (
According to Article 3 of the "Public Welfare Lottery Supervision Committee Regulations" (公益彩券監理委員會組成辦法), proposed by the Ministry of Finance, lottery profits are to be distributed as follows:
First, about 35 percent of lottery proceeds go to local governments. Half of those funds are used for social welfare and charity causes. About 45 percent of the funds are used for the National Pension Program (
Second, 15 percent of the lottery revenues that go to the government are supposed to be evenly divided among local-level governments. The remaining 85 percent of those revenues are to be allocated to the local governments according to the population and lottery sales of each city or county.
Let us put aside for the time being whether the above distribution is able to solve the financial problems of local governments. We must have the following understanding of the matter:
First, lottery profits are unstable. The tremendous ticket sales in the first week do not guarantee a large profit in the future. In times of plenty all of us are happy because there is enough candy for everyone. In bad times, however, will everyone scramble for the profit as a crowding-out effect occurs?
Second, the distribution policy -- developed by a finance ministry committee -- is just an administrative order, not a law. Hence, the policy is flexible and it will be easy for the finance ministry to change the allocation since sufficient supervision is still lacking.
We must handle lottery profits wisely -- so that the money will not be used by local government chiefs to secure votes or to secretly exchange profits with others.
Since the central government is the authority on the lottery, all social welfare and charity programs sponsored by lottery funds should be directly assigned by the central government -- rather than local governments -- in order to earmark the money for specified purposes only. By doing this, necessary programs will not be sacrificed due to the possible crowding-out effect triggered by unstable lottery profits, and the promotion of public welfare can truly be achieved.
Moreover, we must regulate the distribution of lottery profits. The budget for social welfare is usually cut once the government runs into financial difficulty. Today, the finance ministry is in charge of distribution. The public is unable to judge the priority of the social welfare, national pension and national health insurance programs. If the distribution is not regulated, it may lead to large-scale political struggles and other problems once lottery profits shrink in the future. As a result, the best thing we can do is regulate the distribution of funds in an effort to maintain the scale of the nation's social welfare programs once financial hardship occurs.
At a time when local governments are complaining about their poor financial situation and when public welfare is repeatedly sacrificed, the lottery serves as a "rhapsody" not only for the people but also for the government. It can raise huge amount of money, which is why we should be more careful in handling these funds in order to help those in need.
Yu Jan-daw is a DPP legislator.
Translated by Eddy Chang
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS