The arrogance of power makes clever people become autistic, while the myths of power makes the knowledge of a society paralytic and useless. Two recent government policies show that Taiwanese society is full of arrogance and the myths of power.
The first policy is the Ministry of Finance's tight controls aimed at avoiding a continued decline of credit grants at financial institutions, as a result of the banks' credit squeeze. The contraction of credit is indeed a major factor in the slowing of the economy, but there is a reason for it. Credit in Taiwanese financial institutions relies on hypothecation [pledging of something as security without delivery of title or possession] and not corporate profitability. Granting credit in this way is really stupid. It is also the reason why a lot of capital is tied down in real estate.
In the last year, the political situation has been unstable and we have seen a global economic slowdown, deepening the cautiousness and restraint of investors. The level of knowledge in the capital markets is still low. This lack of knowledge results in low capital investments. In other words, the decline of credit in Taiwan today is due to the finance industry being completely stupid as well as it tying up or scaring away capital. What use can the ministry's measures be in such a situation?
The second regrettable policy is Taipei City Government's recent regulation of Internet cafes, including a ban on admitting children under the age of 15 without an adult and a ban on locating cafes within 200 meters of a school. Despite strong resistance, the mayor insists on implementing the regulation, saying that opinion polls show large numbers of parents back the move. Even though polls are conducted scientifically, it doesn't mean that the results are wise. Just think of the picture of Internet cafes painted in the media over the last year or so -- criminal youth gone astray -- and it's not so difficult to understand why parents want to regulate them. But are Internet cafes really overflowing with evil? Even if they are, are they the source of all this evil?
A recent study from National Sun Yat-sen University states a close relationship between someone losing him/herself in the Internet and him/her having disturbed social relations. In other words, unsound relations with family, school and peers may be the reason for students going to Internet cafes. If parents and teachers do not improve their relationship with their children or students, then what will be the use of regulating Internet cafes? With Taipei's vision of becoming a cyber-city, IT represents the integration of knowledge and technology. How come knowledge is abandoned when IT makes an impact on society?
Knowledge could make a great contribution to the two cases described above. For example, in targeting the credit problem, the finance ministry could make banks share the experience of their methods, successes and failures. Such a sharing of knowledge should be helpful in making the use of capital more efficient and would achieve the ministry's goals. In the same vein, the Taipei City Government should study in detail the family, school and Internet cafe environment to understand why these cafes are so popular and go on from there instead of blindly falling back on opinion polls to ingratiate themselves with the electorate.
Taiwan is a society with a lot of superstitions regarding power, but power without the support of knowledge is very often destructive. The government that repeatedly declares that an educated society is its goal has to avoid the self-conceit and arrogance coming from holding power. Blind power is the greatest enemy of knowledge!
Bob Kuo is a professor of information systems at National Sun Yat-sen University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission