The word is out that Chi Mei Group's (奇美) petrochemical plants in China are being shut down by China's government, because of some quotes from the group's president, Shi Wen-lung (許文龍), in the Japanese comic book On Taiwan (台灣論). Hopefully, this latest event will open the eyes of the herds of Taiwanese businessmen rushing across the Taiwan Strait. If Beijing keeps up the good work, soon it will be able to accomplish a "peaceful unification" by holding all the Taiwanese businessmen in China hostage.
For those who continue to harbor hope that China may change, we can only pity them. Too many examples speak for themselves. The chairman of Acer Inc, Stan Shih (施振榮), was openly criticized in China for serving as a policy adviser to President Chen Shui-bian (
The most pathetic aspect is China's ploy works. Today, Acer keeps a low profile in China, while its president, Shih, keeps a distance from the Chen administration. A-mei's lucrative contract with Coca-Cola was cancelled, her CD removed from music stores in China and her songs vanished from radio broadcasts. A-mei's case should shatter any hopes for those who believe joint ventures with major foreign companies are safe from Beijing's claws. Not even Coca-Cola, a world-renowned US conglomerate, dared to stand up to Beijing.
How does China do it? First, Beijing often harasses businesses deemed as "eyesores" by conducting frequent tax audits and investigating for labor abuses, environmental pollution and violations of fire safety regulations, among other supposed misconduct. The slightest breach of existing laws or regulations brings hefty penalties. These are the gimmicks that Beijing used to drive out Jimmy Lai's retail chain.
Of course, how can we forget Beijing's favorite trick -- rumors. Perhaps Beijing has finally learned a valuable lesson from the 1996 and 2000 presidential elections in Taiwan. After all, even monkeys learn from trial and error, although that may not be the case with Taiwanese businessmen who continue to harbor hopes for Beijing. On both occasions, official criticism from high-ranking China officials helped the presidential candidates they loathed -- namely, Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) and Chen Shui-bian -- to win the election. Since then, China has discovered the wonders of starting "rumors" instead of giving official statements.
Why have high-ranking government officials issue official statements, when they invite international criticism? Why officially ban any businesses, when it jeopardizes China's bids to enter the WTO and host the Olympics, not to mention cools the enthusiasm of foreign and Taiwanese investors? Spreading rumors of possible government sanctions will do, without incurring any of the aforementioned downsides.
As in the case of A-mei, rumor-mongering is exactly the tactic that Beijing is using against Shi Wen-lung. In both instances, no government official has confirmed the imposition of any sanctions. In fact, an official from the Taiwan Affairs Office of China's government has denied any pending sanctions. However, rumors have been sufficient to turn away A-mei's Coca-Cola contract and Chi Mei's business contracts.
Many argue they are safe because they are staying away from "politics." The problem is, no one can ever be certain about what, when or who may irritate Beijing. Those who insist on investing in China will just have to live with these risks.
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
Taiwan People’s Party Legislator-at-large Liu Shu-pin (劉書彬) asked Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) a question on Tuesday last week about President William Lai’s (賴清德) decision in March to officially define the People’s Republic of China (PRC), as governed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), as a foreign hostile force. Liu objected to Lai’s decision on two grounds. First, procedurally, suggesting that Lai did not have the right to unilaterally make that decision, and that Cho should have consulted with the Executive Yuan before he endorsed it. Second, Liu objected over national security concerns, saying that the CCP and Chinese President Xi
RSS