The Executive Yuan yesterday approved changes to the Ministry of Justice Investigation Bureau's
From now on, the MJIB's "domestic security investigations" will include China's activities in Taiwan; unfriendly activities of foreign nationals; activities that violate the Constitution or other laws; economic, financial, technological and information security; and investigation of other issues affecting national security. Political surveillance has been eliminated.
There have been countless examples of the ruling party using intelligence agencies to suppress opposition movements and of intelligence agencies collecting information on opposition figures through illegal and underhand methods. For the convenience of people in power, the intelligence units even collected information on other politicians. These measures gave intelligence work a bad name.
Every justice minister has tussled with the National Security Bureau (NSB) in an attempt to gain control of the MJIB's political surveillance work. Liao Cheng-hao (廖正豪) had a falling out with the NSB over a program designed to strengthen political surveillance. The current minister, Chen Ding-nan (陳定南), also fought for the separation of intelligence and law-enforcement work. But the NSB, with its close ties to the president, always had the advantage.
Eliminating political surveillance is an important step in the reform of the intelligence agencies, but it does not necessarily mean the MJIB will never be involved in political surveillance again. Many of the bureau's new responsibilities are just a thin line away from such tasks. In criminal investigations of politicians, such as the current crackdown on "black gold" politics, the slightest indiscretion can easily lead to accusations of political oppression. A lack of self-restraint on the MJIB's part can bring back the spectre of political surveillance.
Abolishing political surveillance does not imply ignoring national security. The bureau's future responsibilities should be focused on security threats from China and other countries. It should stay current with new modes of technological, economic, or information warfare. The NSB has also set up a technology team and a WTO entry team to tackle new modes of warfare and to strengthen its control over factors that may threaten national security.
Clarifying the MJIB's intelligence and law-enforcement roles is a first step in the reform of intelligence institutions. The bureau should also differentiate its responsibilities from those of the criminal police and turn itself into a specialized criminal investigation agency, perhaps along the lines of the US' Federal Bureau of Investigation.
The control and supervision of intelligence powers is of utmost importance in improving intelligence regulations. Currently, the president single-handedly controls the intelligence system, without any checks and balances from other branches of government. This is hardly compatible with the principles of democracy. The legislature should set up an intelligence committee to supervise the policies and budgets of intelligence agencies. Regulations should also be enacted to require the de-classification of intelligence files so that posterity can scrutinize the work of intelligence agents. Multiple supervision is the best prevention of the abuse of intelligence powers.
In late January, Taiwan’s first indigenous submarine, the Hai Kun (海鯤, or Narwhal), completed its first submerged dive, reaching a depth of roughly 50m during trials in the waters off Kaohsiung. By March, it had managed a fifth dive, still well short of the deep-water and endurance tests required before the navy could accept the vessel. The original delivery deadline of November last year passed months ago. CSBC Corp, Taiwan, the lead contractor, now targets June and the Ministry of National Defense is levying daily penalties for every day the submarine remains unfinished. The Hai Kun was supposed to be
Reports about Elon Musk planning his own semiconductor fab have sparked anxiety, with some warning that Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) could lose key customers to vertical integration. A closer reading suggests a more measured conclusion: Musk is advancing a strategic vision of in-house chip manufacturing, but remains far from replacing the existing foundry ecosystem. For TSMC, the short-term impact is limited; the medium-term challenge lies in supply diversification and pricing pressure, only in the long term could it evolve into a structural threat. The clearest signal is Musk’s announcement that Tesla and SpaceX plan to develop a fab project dubbed “Terafab”
Most schoolchildren learn that the circumference of the Earth is about 40,000km. They do not learn that the global economy depends on just 160 of those kilometers. Blocking two narrow waterways — the Strait of Hormuz and the Taiwan Strait — could send the economy back in time, if not to the Stone Age that US President Donald Trump has been threatening to bomb Iran back to, then at least to the mid-20th century, before the Rolling Stones first hit the airwaves. Over the past month and a half, Iran has turned the Strait of Hormuz, which is about 39km wide at
The ongoing Middle East crisis has reinforced an uncomfortable truth for Taiwan: In an increasingly interconnected and volatile world, distant wars rarely remain distant. What began as a regional confrontation between the US, Israel and Iran has evolved into a strategic shock wave reverberating far beyond the Persian Gulf. For Taiwan, the consequences are immediate, material and deeply unsettling. From Taipei’s perspective, the conflict has exposed two vulnerabilities — Taiwan’s dependence on imported energy and the risks created when Washington’s military attention is diverted. Together, they offer a preview of the pressures Taiwan might increasingly face in an era of overlapping geopolitical
RSS