The Swedish Academy has bestowed the first Nobel Prize in literature of the new century on the exiled Chinese novelist and playwright Gao Xingjian (
After the death of Mao Zedong (
Having studied French literature in Beijing's Foreign Language Institute before the Cultural Revolution, Gao was one of the first Chinese to become acquainted with Western modernism. His plays represent a lofty ambition to start a trend in China to break away from the restrains of both traditional Chinese prose and the Communist literary mentality. He used Western techniques to manifested the absurdity of China's reality in his plays such as Absolute Signal (
After Tiananmen he wrote the play Fugitives (
heretic
In Fugitives, he also expressed through the play's protagonists his contempt for the hollow concepts of "people," "country" and "collective will," all concepts that flooded Chinese literature not only during the communist era but throughout the 20th century. The play has one central theme, that trying to escape is human destiny. Obviously, this theme, as the themes in many of his plays and other writings, is heretical to China's authorities. But Gao's work is not trammeled by its Chinese background.
The background and characters of Fugitives could be easily replaced by another setting or group of protagonists. The aspirations of the characters in the play are to be met in every society, and it is for this reason that Gao's work can be said to be "an oeuvre of universal validity," as the Swedish Academy acknowledged.
Even though Fugitives was seen as a political play by the Chinese authorities, condemned in the official media and banned in China, Gao declared he had no intention to use literature to express political ideals.
"I write simply because that, as a human being, not merely as a Chinese, I want to prove my existence," he wrote.
But he also believes that "faced with political and social oppression, one must resist and rebel." Therefore, he publicly declared after the 1989 Tiananmen massacre that he "would not go back to the so-called motherland as long as it remains under a totalitarian regime."
Gao's most weighty work so far is Soul Mountain, (
"I have put all the memories of my youth, my thoughts and my doubts about Chinese culture into that book," Gao has said. However, this modern Western-style work of art failed to attract any attention at all in Taiwan where traditionalism continues to dominate.
Another work of his, One Man's Bible (
Also, though refreshing in style and rich in the use of the Chinese language, some of his works lack the originality that masterpieces should display; sometimes they can seem too derivative of Western literary works and forms.
Nevertheless, his daring inspires reflection about being not only a Chinese but a human being, and his robust rejection of writing to support an ideology, be it nationality, motherland or the masses, but rather writing in search for satisfaction of the needs of one's soul may truly be considered refreshing for Chinese.
Following is a list of winners of the Nobel Prize in literature since 1975. The prize was first awarded in 1901.
2000 Gao Xingjian (China)
1999 Guenter Grass (Germany)
1998 Jose Saramago (Portugal)
1997 Dario Fo (Italy)
1996 Wislawa Szymborska (Poland)
1995 Seamus Heaney (Ireland)
1994 Kenzaburo Oe (Japan)
1993 Toni Morrison (US)
1992 Derek Walcott (Trinidad)
1991 Nadine Gordimer (South Africa)
1990 Octavio Paz (Mexico)
1989 Camilo Jose Cela (Spain)
1988 Naguib Mahfouz (Egypt)
1987 Joseph Brodsky (US)
1986 Wole Soyinka (Nigeria)
1985 Claude Simon (France)
1984 Jaroslav Seifert (Czechoslovakia)
1983 William Golding (Britain)
1982 Gabriel Garcia Marquez (Colombia)
1981 Elias Canetti (Britain)
1980 Czeslaw Milosz (United States)
1979 Odysseus Elytis (Greece)
1978 Isaac Bashevis Singer (US)
1977 Vicente Aleixandre (Spain)
1976 Saul Bellow (US)
1975 Eugenio Montale (Italy)
Cao Chang-ching (
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission