Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou
The new trash collection scheme aims to reduce the volume of the city's waste by having the users of the garbage-collection service pay for it directly, instead of assessing fees through water utility bills as in the past. The hope is that the volume of garbage will be reduced because the new fees will encourage households to separate their trash into "recyclables" and "non-recyclables," as well as encourage the reuse of recycled materials.
The underlying motive and and objective of the policy are right on the mark. However, the actual implementation appears fraught with problems. First of all, the city government has done a less than ideal job of promoting the new policy. Taipei residents have yet to receive any instructional brochures or fliers from the government. How should they divide up their garbage? What do they do with trash that doesn't fit into the new bags? Where can they buy the bags? What kind of sanctions and penalties will be imposed on violators?
Even the project's spokeperson, singer Pou Hsueh-liang
The city government attempted to distribute sample trash bags and discount coupons during the trial period by utilizing the heads of local boroughs and neighborhoods. Unfortunately, these local officials were even less enthusiastic about handing out these materials than they were about distributing Lien Chan's
The city government keeps saying the program won't be a burden on residents. Officials say the new fee system will enable the city to put the trash money into a special account set up to improve waste-disposal procedures. However, since no one yet knows whether the garbage -- in the bright new blue bags -- will end up at an incinerator or somewhere else, it is difficult to convince residents that the new system will be much of an improvement over the old one.
Another major drawback is that the policy is only being implemented in Taipei City. Neighboring Taipei County has not adopted a similar measure. Undoubtedly a large volume of trash is going to be discarded in Taipei County in order to avoid paying for the city's collection service. More friction between the city and county is sure to result.
Theoretically speaking, special trash bags may be a good idea, but is Taipei City really in a position to implement the new policy? Are residents prepared, either psychologically and practically, to cooperate? Has the city government completed all the relevant instructions and preparations for implementation and rehearsed the actual collection operation? So far, all the answers are in the negative.
Mayor Ma has taken an enormous gamble with this unique waste-disposal scheme. He calls the new policy a "Mission Impossible." We really don't want to see him fail. But he needs a better scriptwriter and director if he wants to have a box-office hit -- not to mention avoiding seeing the new program "self-destruct in five seconds."
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
Whether in terms of market commonality or resource similarity, South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co is the biggest competitor of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). The two companies have agreed to set up factories in the US and are also recipients of subsidies from the US CHIPS and Science Act, which was signed into law by former US president Joe Biden. However, changes in the market competitiveness of the two companies clearly reveal the context behind TSMC’s investments in the US. As US semiconductor giant Intel Corp has faced continuous delays developing its advanced processes, the world’s two major wafer foundries, TSMC and
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
We are witnessing a sea change in the government’s approach to China, from one of reasonable, low-key reluctance at rocking the boat to a collapse of pretense over and patience in Beijing’s willful intransigence. Finally, we are seeing a more common sense approach in the face of active shows of hostility from a foreign power. According to Article 2 of the 2020 Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法), a “foreign hostile force” is defined as “countries, political entities or groups that are at war with or are engaged in a military standoff with the Republic of China [ROC]. The same stipulation applies to
RSS