Arm Holdings PLC approached Intel Corp about potentially buying the ailing chipmaker’s product division, only to be told that the business is not for sale, according to a source with direct knowledge of the matter.
In the high-level inquiry, Arm did not express interest in Intel’s manufacturing operations, said the source, who asked not to be identified because the discussions were private.
Intel has two main units: A product group that sells chips for personal computers, servers and networking equipment, and another that operates its factories.
Photo: Reuters
Representatives for Arm and Intel declined to comment.
Intel, once the world’s largest chipmaker, has become the target of takeover speculation since a rapid deterioration of its business this year. The company delivered a disastrous earnings report last month — sending its shares on their worst rout in decades — and is slashing 15,000 jobs to save money. It is also scaling back factory expansion plans and halting its long-cherished dividend.
As part of its turnaround efforts, Intel is separating the chip product division from its manufacturing operations. The move is aimed at attracting outside customers and investors, but it also lays the groundwork for the company to be split up — something Intel has considered, Bloomberg reported last month.
Arm, which is majority-owned by SoftBank Group Corp, makes much of its revenue selling chip designs for smartphones.
However, Arm chief executive officer Rene Haas has sought to broaden its reach outside of that industry. That has included a push into personal computers and servers, where its chip designs are going up against Intel’s.
Although Intel does not have the technological edge it once held, the Santa Clara, California-based company remains dominant in those markets.
Combining with Intel would help Arm’s reach and kick-start a move toward selling more of its own products. The company licenses technology and designs to customers, who then turn them into complete components. Its client list includes the biggest names in technology, such as Amazon.com Inc, Qualcomm Inc and Samsung Electronics Co.
Under Haas, the company has moved more in the direction of offering fully formed products — potentially putting it in competition with its licensees.
Arm, based in Cambridge, England, only has a fraction of Intel’s revenue. However, its valuation has soared since an initial public offering last year and now stands at more than US$156 billion.
Investors see the company as a beneficiary of the artificial intelligence spending boom, especially as it moves further into data center chips. Arm also has the backing of Japan’s SoftBank, which owns an 88 percent stake, potentially giving the company additional financial clout.
Intel, in contrast, has lost more than half its value this year and has a current market capitalization of US$102.3 billion. However, the company has other options to consider. Apollo Global Management Inc offered to make an investment in the company, Bloomberg reported this week. The firm indicated in recent days that it would be willing to put in as much as US$5 billion, marking a vote of confidence for CEO Pat Gelsinger.
Intel also plans to sell part of its stake in semiconductor maker Altera Corp to private equity investors. That business, which the chipmaker bought in 2015, was separated from Intel’s operations last year with the goal of taking it public.
On Tuesday, US President Donald Trump weighed in on a pressing national issue: The rebranding of a restaurant chain. Last week, Cracker Barrel, a Tennessee company whose nationwide locations lean heavily on a cozy, old-timey aesthetic — “rocking chairs on the porch, a warm fire in the hearth, peg games on the table” — announced it was updating its logo. Uncle Herschel, the man who once appeared next to the letters with a barrel, was gone. It sparked ire on the right, with Donald Trump Jr leading a charge against the rebranding: “WTF is wrong with Cracker Barrel?!” Later, Trump Sr weighed
HEADWINDS: Upfront investment is unavoidable in the merger, but cost savings would materialize over time, TS Financial Holding Co president Welch Lin said TS Financial Holding Co (台新新光金控) said it would take about two years before the benefits of its merger with Shin Kong Financial Holding Co (新光金控) become evident, as the group prioritizes the consolidation of its major subsidiaries. “The group’s priority is to complete the consolidation of different subsidiaries,” Welch Lin (林維俊), president of the nation’s fourth-largest financial conglomerate by assets, told reporters during its first earnings briefing since the merger took effect on July 24. The asset management units are scheduled to merge in November, followed by life insurance in January next year and securities operations in April, Lin said. Banking integration,
LOOPHOLES: The move is to end a break that was aiding foreign producers without any similar benefit for US manufacturers, the US Department of Commerce said US President Donald Trump’s administration would make it harder for Samsung Electronics Co and SK Hynix Inc to ship critical equipment to their chipmaking operations in China, dealing a potential blow to the companies’ production in the world’s largest semiconductor market. The US Department of Commerce in a notice published on Friday said that it was revoking waivers for Samsung and SK Hynix to use US technologies in their Chinese operations. The companies had been operating in China under regulations that allow them to import chipmaking equipment without applying for a new license each time. The move would revise what is known
Artificial intelligence (AI) chip designer Cambricon Technologies Corp (寒武紀科技) plunged almost 9 percent after warning investors about a doubling in its share price over just a month, a record gain that helped fuel a US$1 trillion Chinese market rally. Cambricon triggered the selloff with a Thursday filing in which it dispelled talk about nonexistent products in the pipeline, reminded investors it labors under US sanctions, and stressed the difficulties of ascending the technology ladder. The Shanghai-listed company’s stock dived by the most since April in early yesterday trading, while the market stood largely unchanged. The litany of warnings underscores growing scrutiny of