Intel Corp’s decision on Monday to postpone its planned factory in Germany marks a setback for the European Union’s semiconductor ambitions and will reignite controversy in Berlin over where to allocate 10 billion euros (US$11 billion) in earmarked subsidies.
The embattled US chipmaker’s move to delay the project in Magdeburg by about two years is a blow to the EU’s goal of producing one-fifth of the world’s semiconductors by 2030. The German facility was on track to be the biggest plant supported under the EU’s Chips Act that was passed last year.
Governments around the world have lavished public funds on the chip industry in a push to localize production of components that control everything from cutting-edge artificial intelligence to everyday gadgets. The push comes after COVID-era supply disruptions and as rising tensions between the US and China over Taiwan could interfere with a key source of the essential technology.
Photo: I-hwa Cheng, AFP
“We have earmarked funds that will continue to be needed for our semiconductor projects,” German Chancellor Olaf Scholz told reporters yesterday during a trip to Kazakhstan. “It is obvious that we also want to promote semiconductor development in Germany.”
No state money has been used yet for the Magdeburg project, which was in the final stages of getting EU approval. Its delay could free up funds as Germany faces a financing gap of at least 12 billion euros in next year’s draft budget.
German Minister of Finance Christian Lindner said all funds not required for Intel must now be reserved for the reduction of “open financial questions” in the federal budget. “Anything else would not be responsible politics,” he said in a post on X.
Lindner is a key protagonist within the German government who insists the country sticks to its constitutionally enshrined borrowing limits. Officials like German Minister for Economic Affairs and Climate Action Robert Habeck, however, have lobbied to reform or suspend the so-called debt brake to help finance investments in technology and crumbling infrastructure.
The funds for the government’s semiconductor subsidies are not part of the regular budget, they are located in a special pot called climate and transformation fund managed by Habeck’s ministry.
Intel’s delay is “purely a business decision,” Habeck said, speaking on the sidelines of a start-up forum in Berlin. Germany will maintain its strategy of encouraging semiconductor production in Europe, he said.
Intel’s decision adds to a string of recent bad news for Germany. Volkswagen AG, its top automaker, made a shock announcement this month that it wants to end a decades-old labor pact and possibly close domestic factories, citing lagging demand. BMW AG cut its full-year earnings guidance and is wrestling with a large recall over potentially faulty brake systems supplied by Continental AG.
Investor confidence in Germany’s economy plunged to its lowest level in almost a year. An expectations gauge compiled by the ZEW institute fell to 3.6 this month from 19.2 last month. None of the 22 economists surveyed by Bloomberg before the release foresaw such a slump.
“The hope for a swift improvement in the economic situation is visibly fading,” ZEW president Achim Wambach said yesterday in a statement. “Although the falling economic expectations for the euro zone point to an overall rise in pessimism, the drop in expectations for Germany is significantly greater.”
To be sure, other German chip projects are making progress. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (台積電) broke ground in eastern Germany last month for its first European plant. About half of the money for that 10 billion euros fab will come from state subsidies.
“Without Intel in Magdeburg, Europe is lacking its flagship project,” German industry group Silicon Saxony managing director Frank Bosenberg said. “Neither a European market share of 20 percent or the desired technological sovereignty through semiconductor production below 10 nanometers seem realistically achievable by 2030.”
The EU and US are nearing an agreement to coordinate on producing and securing critical minerals, part of a push to break reliance on Chinese supplies. The potential deal would create incentives, such as minimum prices, that could advantage non-Chinese suppliers, according to a draft of an “action plan” seen by Bloomberg. The EU and US would also cooperate on standards, investments and joint projects, as well as coordinate on any supply disruptions by countries like China. The two sides are additionally seeking other “like-minded partners” to join a multicountry accord to help create these new critical mineral supply chains, which feed into
For weeks now, the global tech industry has been waiting for a major artificial intelligence (AI) launch from DeepSeek (深度求索), seen as a benchmark for China’s progress in the fast-moving field. More than a year has passed since the start-up put Chinese AI on the map in early last year with a low-cost chatbot that performed at a similar level to US rivals. However, despite reports and rumors about its imminent release, DeepSeek’s next-generation “V4” model is nowhere in sight. Speculation is also swirling over the geopolitical implications of which computer chips were chosen to train and power the new
Elon Musk’s lieutenants have reached out to chip industry suppliers, including Applied Materials Inc, Tokyo Electron Ltd and Lam Research Corp, for his envisioned Terafab, early steps in an audacious and likely arduous attempt to break into the production of cutting-edge chips. Staff working for the joint venture between Tesla Inc and Space Exploration Technologies Corp (SpaceX) have sought price quotes and delivery times for an array of chipmaking gear, people familiar with the matter said. In past weeks, they’ve contacted makers of photomasks, substrates, etchers, depositors, cleaning devices, testers and other tools, according to the people, who asked not to
Japan approved ¥631.5 billion (US$3.97 billion) in additional subsidies to hasten Rapidus Corp’s entry into the high-stakes artificial intelligence (AI) chipmaking arena, ramping up support for a project widely regarded as a long shot. The capital is intended to bankroll Rapidus’ work for information technology firm Fujitsu Ltd, one of the initial customers that Tokyo hopes would get the signature endeavor off the ground. The new money raises the fees and investments that the government is injecting into the start-up to ¥2.6 trillion by the end of the current fiscal year to March next year, the Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade and