It is the case of the vanishing start-up: Some of Silicon Valley’s most promising names in the fast-developing generative artificial intelligence (AI) space are being gobbled up by or tied to the hip of US tech giants.
Short on funds, in the past few months promising companies like Inflection AI Inc or Adept AI Labs Inc have seen founders and key executives quietly exit the stage to join the world’s dominant tech companies through discrete transactions.
Critics believe these deals are acquisitions in all but name and have been especially designed by Microsoft Corp or Amazon.com Inc to avoid the attention of competition regulators, which the companies strenuously deny.
Photo: AP
Meanwhile, firms like Character AI are reported to be struggling to raise the cash needed to remain independent, and some, like French start-up Mistral AI, are thought to be especially vulnerable to being bought out by a tech giant.
Even ChatGPT’s creator OpenAI is locked in a relationship with Microsoft, the world’s biggest company by market capitalization. Microsoft helps guarantee OpenAI’s future with US$13 billion in investment in return for exclusive access to the start-up’s industry-leading models. Amazon has its own deal with Anthropic PBC, which makes its own high-performing models.
Joining the revolution brought by the era-defining release of ChatGPT requires a supply of cash that only tech behemoths like Microsoft, Amazon or Google can afford.
“The ones with the big money define the rules and design the outcomes that play in their favor,” said Sriram Sundararajan, a tech investor and adjunct faculty member at the Leavey School of Business at Santa Clara University.
Breaking from typical Silicon Valley legend, generative AI would not be developed out of some founder’s garage.
That type of artificial intelligence, which creates human-like content in just seconds, is a special breed of technology that requires colossal levels of computing from specialized servers.
“Start-ups have been founded by former research leaders at big tech companies, and they require the resources that only large cloud providers can make available,” said Brendan Burke, AI analyst at Pitchbook, which tracks the venture capital world.
“They’re not following the traditional entrepreneurial journey of doing more with less, they’re really looking to recreate the conditions that they experienced working in a highly funded research lab,” Burke said.
Many of these founders, including those at Inflection or Adept, came from Google or OpenAI. Mustafa Suleyman, the former boss of Inflection, was a leader at Google DeepMind and has now left his start-up, with key employees in tow, to head up the consumer AI division at Microsoft.
Inflection still exists on paper, but has been stripped of the very assets that gave it value.
Lining up with the big tech companies “makes a lot of sense,” said Abdullah Snobar, executive director at DMZ, a start-up incubator in Toronto. Their deep pockets help keep “the wheels greased and things moving forward.”
However, aligning with established tech behemoths also risks “killing competition,” potentially creating a situation where “these three big tech companies [are] sucking up all the juice” of creativity and innovation, he added.
The burning question in Silicon Valley is whether government regulators would do anything about it. Big tech companies are increasingly in the spotlight for their appetite to eat up smaller firms.
US, EU and UK regulators on Tuesday signed a joint statement saying that they would not let big tech companies run roughshod over the nascent AI industry.
It is a sign that “regulation is catching up to AI,” Sundararajan warned.
CHIP RACE: Three years of overbroad export controls drove foreign competitors to pursue their own AI chips, and ‘cost US taxpayers billions of dollars,’ Nvidia said China has figured out the US strategy for allowing it to buy Nvidia Corp’s H200s and is rejecting the artificial intelligence (AI) chip in favor of domestically developed semiconductors, White House AI adviser David Sacks said, citing news reports. US President Donald Trump on Monday said that he would allow shipments of Nvidia’s H200 chips to China, part of an administration effort backed by Sacks to challenge Chinese tech champions such as Huawei Technologies Co (華為) by bringing US competition to their home market. On Friday, Sacks signaled that he was uncertain about whether that approach would work. “They’re rejecting our chips,” Sacks
NATIONAL SECURITY: Intel’s testing of ACM tools despite US government control ‘highlights egregious gaps in US technology protection policies,’ a former official said Chipmaker Intel Corp has tested chipmaking tools this year from a toolmaker with deep roots in China and two overseas units that were targeted by US sanctions, according to two sources with direct knowledge of the matter. Intel, which fended off calls for its CEO’s resignation from US President Donald Trump in August over his alleged ties to China, got the tools from ACM Research Inc, a Fremont, California-based producer of chipmaking equipment. Two of ACM’s units, based in Shanghai and South Korea, were among a number of firms barred last year from receiving US technology over claims they have
BARRIERS: Gudeng’s chairman said it was unlikely that the US could replicate Taiwan’s science parks in Arizona, given its strict immigration policies and cultural differences Gudeng Precision Industrial Co (家登), which supplies wafer pods to the world’s major semiconductor firms, yesterday said it is in no rush to set up production in the US due to high costs. The company supplies its customers through a warehouse in Arizona jointly operated by TSS Holdings Ltd (德鑫控股), a joint holding of Gudeng and 17 Taiwanese firms in the semiconductor supply chain, including specialty plastic compounds producer Nytex Composites Co (耐特) and automated material handling system supplier Symtek Automation Asia Co (迅得). While the company has long been exploring the feasibility of setting up production in the US to address
OPTION: Uber said it could provide higher pay for batch trips, if incentives for batching is not removed entirely, as the latter would force it to pass on the costs to consumers Uber Technologies Inc yesterday warned that proposed restrictions on batching orders and minimum wages could prompt a NT$20 delivery fee increase in Taiwan, as lower efficiency would drive up costs. Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi made the remarks yesterday during his visit to Taiwan. He is on a multileg trip to the region, which includes stops in South Korea and Japan. His visit coincided the release last month of the Ministry of Labor’s draft bill on the delivery sector, which aims to safeguard delivery workers’ rights and improve their welfare. The ministry set the minimum pay for local food delivery drivers at
RSS