As Taiwan is accelerating its drafting of regulations on artificial intelligence (AI) following the European Council’s passage of the EU AI Act, IBM suggested that local regulators focus on regulating the use of the transformative technology to address various risks, including the generation of falsehoods and issues of bias.
Paul Burton, general manager of IBM Asia-Pacific, offered his advice on AI regulations in an exclusive interview with the Taipei Times last week. During his 36-hour trip to Taiwan, Burton met with IBM’s key clients in the financial services and banking sectors.
“I think there are certain principles that I think are good. One of them is not to regulate the development of technology, but to regulate the use of technology,” Burton said. “The regulation should never hinder the development of technology itself.”
Photo: Bloomberg
The Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) on Thursday released its official guidelines, offering instructions for financial institutions and banks to introduce AI tools and manage potential risks based on four categories of AI life cycles. About one-third of 377 financial institutions, mostly banks, have adopted AI tools for customer services, risk evaluations and other functions, the FSC data showed.
By the end of October, the National Science and Technology Council would be ready with a draft AI basic law for various businesses, as rapidly developing generative AI technology poses risks of intellectual property infringement, limited transparency in how the systems function, issues of bias and fairness, or security concerns.
“I do not want to recommend any for Taiwan. Taiwan should come up with its own laws,” Burton said when asked if he would suggest any references.
With implementation of the EU AI Act imminent, many countries are moving ahead with robust regulations and guidelines, but business leaders around the world are feeling pressure to prepare, Burton said.
They are not exactly sure what they are preparing for, he said.
Based on IBM’s “2024 CEO Study,” few than 60 percent of global executives think their organizations are prepared for AI regulation and 69 percent expect a regulatory fine due to generative AI adoption, Burton said.
In the face of this uncertainty and risk, CEOs are pumping the brakes, he said.
More than half, or 56 percent, are delaying major investments until they have clarity on AI standards and regulations, he said.
Overall, 72 percent of executives say their organizations will forgo generative AI benefits due to ethical concerns, he said.
As the financial service sector is IBM’s cash cow, the company launched the Watsonx platform, opening up exciting prospects in financial advisory and data analysis, Burton said.
Configuring generative AI models correctly can simplify complex financial concepts and make them easier for customers to understand in deterministic financial environments, he said.
Financial institutions need to use generative AI thoughtfully to find the right balance between innovation and ethical practices, he added.
Banking is among the industries that could see the biggest impact as a percentage of their revenues from generative AI, especially in terms of customer operations, marketing and sales, banking software, and risk and legal compliance, Burton said.
Across the banking industry, for example, the technology could deliver value equal to an additional US$200 billion to US$340 billion annually if just currently identified use cases are fully implemented, he said, citing the estimates by the World Economic Forum last year.
As IBM is at the forefront of technologies like AI, hybrid cloud and quantum computing, the company built a powerful AI governance into its Watsonx platform and developed quantum-safe cryptography to secure sensitive data, he said.
It is why IBM advocates for smart AI regulation, including holding those who develop and deploy AI accountable for fraudulent, discriminatory and harmful activity, he said.
It is also why IBM and Meta announced the formation of the AI Alliance, a group of more than 70 organizations dedicated to advancing open, safe and responsible AI, he said.
CHIP RACE: Three years of overbroad export controls drove foreign competitors to pursue their own AI chips, and ‘cost US taxpayers billions of dollars,’ Nvidia said China has figured out the US strategy for allowing it to buy Nvidia Corp’s H200s and is rejecting the artificial intelligence (AI) chip in favor of domestically developed semiconductors, White House AI adviser David Sacks said, citing news reports. US President Donald Trump on Monday said that he would allow shipments of Nvidia’s H200 chips to China, part of an administration effort backed by Sacks to challenge Chinese tech champions such as Huawei Technologies Co (華為) by bringing US competition to their home market. On Friday, Sacks signaled that he was uncertain about whether that approach would work. “They’re rejecting our chips,” Sacks
NATIONAL SECURITY: Intel’s testing of ACM tools despite US government control ‘highlights egregious gaps in US technology protection policies,’ a former official said Chipmaker Intel Corp has tested chipmaking tools this year from a toolmaker with deep roots in China and two overseas units that were targeted by US sanctions, according to two sources with direct knowledge of the matter. Intel, which fended off calls for its CEO’s resignation from US President Donald Trump in August over his alleged ties to China, got the tools from ACM Research Inc, a Fremont, California-based producer of chipmaking equipment. Two of ACM’s units, based in Shanghai and South Korea, were among a number of firms barred last year from receiving US technology over claims they have
Taiwan’s exports soared 56 percent year-on-year to an all-time high of US$64.05 billion last month, propelled by surging global demand for artificial intelligence (AI), high-performance computing and cloud service infrastructure, the Ministry of Finance said yesterday. Department of Statistics Director-General Beatrice Tsai (蔡美娜) called the figure an unexpected upside surprise, citing a wave of technology orders from overseas customers alongside the usual year-end shopping season for technology products. Growth is likely to remain strong this month, she said, projecting a 40 percent to 45 percent expansion on an annual basis. The outperformance could prompt the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and
BARRIERS: Gudeng’s chairman said it was unlikely that the US could replicate Taiwan’s science parks in Arizona, given its strict immigration policies and cultural differences Gudeng Precision Industrial Co (家登), which supplies wafer pods to the world’s major semiconductor firms, yesterday said it is in no rush to set up production in the US due to high costs. The company supplies its customers through a warehouse in Arizona jointly operated by TSS Holdings Ltd (德鑫控股), a joint holding of Gudeng and 17 Taiwanese firms in the semiconductor supply chain, including specialty plastic compounds producer Nytex Composites Co (耐特) and automated material handling system supplier Symtek Automation Asia Co (迅得). While the company has long been exploring the feasibility of setting up production in the US to address
RSS