China is investing billions in Europe’s video game industry, but analysts have warned that there could be trouble along the road unless regulators start to take stricter notice.
Europe is embroiled in long-running disputes with Beijing over trade, environment, education, raw materials and intellectual property — but so far video games are not part of the fight.
As Beijing tightens up on the video game industry at home, China’s tech giants are looking to make investments overseas — prompting concerns ranging from data security to limits on creative freedom.
Photo: EPA-EFE
“Europe has this idea that we will be able to separate strategic industries from non-strategic industries,” Antonia Hmaidi from the Mercator Institute think-tank told reporters. “Video games for most policymakers will always go into the non-strategic pile.”
This has helped Tencent Holdings Ltd (騰訊), the world’s largest games company by revenue, to buy into studios across Europe — including the then world-record US$8.6 billion deal for Finnish firm Supercell Oy in 2016.
Chinese rival NetEase Inc (網易) made its biggest foray into foreign gaming studios in August, snaffling French firm Quantic Dream SA — just days before Tencent upped its stake in Ubisoft SA, another French studio.
EU regulators only look at major investments with a pan-European dimension and national regulators have shown no interest.
When Tencent bought British studio Sumo Group Ltd for US$1.3 billion last year, the deal was scrutinized not by UK regulators, but by their US counterparts.
Chinese firms are increasingly seeking profits abroad, analysts say, because of stifling restrictions in their home market.
The Chinese government has identified video games as a potential threat not only to state power, but also to the well-being of citizens. Beijing introduced a nine-month ban on approval of new video games last year and now approves only a fraction of the number it once allowed onto the market.
Game makers have had to scrub “politically harmful” content and the state has tightly restricted the time youngsters can spend gaming.
“Chinese companies in general are looking further afield given the climate of the domestic market,” said Louise Shorthouse of Ampere Analysis Ltd.
Several reports have suggested that Tencent is preparing to ramp up its overseas investments and could even begin to take control of smaller firms.
Tencent is essentially “sitting on a load of cash,” said Kevin Shimota, a former marketing manager at the company and author of th book The First Superapp.
“The Chinese market is cold right now, so in terms of Tencent’s global strategy you’d expect it to be more aggressive,” he said.
However, he said that the aim was unlikely to be direct takeovers or deeper control of foreign companies, rather Tencent might look at ways of developing games for audiences outside of China.
Tencent is ubiquitous in China, an empire of games, social media and payment services largely funneled through its WeChat app, which boasts more than 1 billion monthly users. Its leader, Pony Ma (馬化騰), has worked hard to keep himself out of the limelight — and out of Beijing’s firing line. The company is determined to present a humble face to the world.
“Whether we are a minority investor or a majority shareholder, we do not exercise creative, editorial, management, or day-to-day control,” Tencent told reporters in a statement.
Tencent’s business model has generally been to buy into foreign firms and publish their games for the Chinese market.
As those foreign companies were unlikely to find any other way into China, they welcomed the investment and new revenue streams. NetEase is following the same model.
A blog from Quantic Dream announcing the takeover said that the French firm would maintain control over the “editorial line, the artistic direction of our projects and the management of the studio.”
NetEase did not respond to a request for comment.
Hmaidi said the hands-off approach was fine when business was booming — but the effects of an economic downturn or political upheaval were impossible to predict.
European regulators, she said, could benefit from a broader approach that questioned whether a single country — China or any other nation — should be allowed to dominate an entire industry.
"Having a sector dependent on China just in general is bad at the moment," she said.
WEAKER ACTIVITY: The sharpest deterioration was seen in the electronics and optical components sector, with the production index falling 13.2 points to 44.5 Taiwan’s manufacturing sector last month contracted for a second consecutive month, with the purchasing managers’ index (PMI) slipping to 48, reflecting ongoing caution over trade uncertainties, the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research (CIER, 中華經濟研究院) said yesterday. The decline reflects growing caution among companies amid uncertainty surrounding US tariffs, semiconductor duties and automotive import levies, and it is also likely linked to fading front-loading activity, CIER president Lien Hsien-ming (連賢明) said. “Some clients have started shifting orders to Southeast Asian countries where tariff regimes are already clear,” Lien told a news conference. Firms across the supply chain are also lowering stock levels to mitigate
IN THE AIR: While most companies said they were committed to North American operations, some added that production and costs would depend on the outcome of a US trade probe Leading local contract electronics makers Wistron Corp (緯創), Quanta Computer Inc (廣達), Inventec Corp (英業達) and Compal Electronics Inc (仁寶) are to maintain their North American expansion plans, despite Washington’s 20 percent tariff on Taiwanese goods. Wistron said it has long maintained a presence in the US, while distributing production across Taiwan, North America, Southeast Asia and Europe. The company is in talks with customers to align capacity with their site preferences, a company official told the Taipei Times by telephone on Friday. The company is still in talks with clients over who would bear the tariff costs, with the outcome pending further
Six Taiwanese companies, including contract chipmaker Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), made the 2025 Fortune Global 500 list of the world’s largest firms by revenue. In a report published by New York-based Fortune magazine on Tuesday, Hon Hai Precision Industry Co (鴻海精密), also known as Foxconn Technology Group (富士康科技集團), ranked highest among Taiwanese firms, placing 28th with revenue of US$213.69 billion. Up 60 spots from last year, TSMC rose to No. 126 with US$90.16 billion in revenue, followed by Quanta Computer Inc (廣達) at 348th, Pegatron Corp (和碩) at 461st, CPC Corp, Taiwan (台灣中油) at 494th and Wistron Corp (緯創) at
NEGOTIATIONS: Semiconductors play an outsized role in Taiwan’s industrial and economic development and are a major driver of the Taiwan-US trade imbalance With US President Donald Trump threatening to impose tariffs on semiconductors, Taiwan is expected to face a significant challenge, as information and communications technology (ICT) products account for more than 70 percent of its exports to the US, Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research (CIER, 中華經濟研究院) president Lien Hsien-ming (連賢明) said on Friday. Compared with other countries, semiconductors play a disproportionately large role in Taiwan’s industrial and economic development, Lien said. As the sixth-largest contributor to the US trade deficit, Taiwan recorded a US$73.9 billion trade surplus with the US last year — up from US$47.8 billion in 2023 — driven by strong