A 2018 advertising pact between Alphabet Inc’s Google and Meta Platforms Inc does not contravene antitrust law because it does not restrict Facebook from using rival ad exchanges, Google’s attorney told a federal judge.
Texas and a group of other US states sued Google over the agreement, nicknamed Jedi Blue, as well as other anticompetitive conduct that they said allowed the search giant to monopolize the market for the technology to buy, sell and service online advertising.
Google and Meta, which is not a defendant in the case, have defended the agreement and denied any wrongdoing.
Photo: Reuters
“The written agreement itself has nothing unlawful in it,” Eric Mahr, an attorney for Google, said on Wednesday at a hearing in a Manhattan federal court.
The deal expanded competition because it allows Facebook to bid on ads being sold through Google’s ad exchange on behalf of Web sites or mobile apps within its Facebook Audience Network, he said.
However, Ashley Keller, a lawyer representing Texas, said that Google entered into the deal to give Meta advantages on the exchange it runs to buy and sell advertising.
In exchange, the social media company abandoned plans to adopt a new type of technology that would have undercut Google’s online advertising monopoly, he said.
“They were smart enough not to write down their agreement that could result in criminal sanctions,” Keller said. “Nobody wants to go to jail and wear an orange jumpsuit.”
Google has asked Judge P. Kevin Castel to dismiss the antitrust suit, saying that all of the conduct that the states target is legal.
“Google does not have to design any of its products to take into account the interests of rivals,” Mahr told Castel on Wednesday, adding that the states “want to turn Google into an ad tech utility.”
However, Keller said that Google has consistently taken steps to make it harder for rivals to compete, such as manipulating auctions for online advertising to ensure Google’s products end up winning.
When those efforts did not succeed, Google would buy off the competition, as it did with Meta, he said.
The Google-Meta pact, first made public in the states’ suit, is now also under investigation by regulators in Europe and the UK.
“There are privileges that Google gives to its own buying tools,” Keller said. “It’s just naked anticompetitive behavior to make sure others can’t disrupt the monopoly.”
Castel, who asked dozens of questions about Google’s ad tech tools and the online advertising market during the two-hour hearing, said the arguments were “helpful,” but did not indicate how he might rule, or when.
Lawyers for the US Department of Justice — which sued Google in 2020 for allegedly monopolizing the search market and is separately probing the company’s ad tech business — attended Wednesday’s hearing.
HORMUZ ISSUE: The US president said he expected crude prices to drop at the end of the war, which he called a ‘minor excursion’ that could continue ‘for a little while’ The United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Kuwait started reducing oil production, as the near-closure of the crucial Strait of Hormuz ripples through energy markets and affects global supply. Abu Dhabi National Oil Co (ADNOC) is “managing offshore production levels to address storage requirements,” the company said in a statement, without giving details. Kuwait Petroleum Corp said it was lowering production at its oil fields and refineries after “Iranian threats against safe passage of ships through the Strait of Hormuz.” The war in the Middle East has all but closed Hormuz, the narrow waterway linking the Persian Gulf to the open seas,
RATIONING: The proposal would give the Trump administration ample leverage to negotiate investments in the US as it decides how many chips to give each country US officials are debating a new regulatory framework for exporting artificial intelligence (AI) chips and are considering requiring foreign nations to invest in US AI data centers or security guarantees as a condition for granting exports of 200,000 chips or more, according to a document seen by Reuters. The rules are not yet final and could change. They would be the first attempt to regulate the flow of AI chips to US allies and partners since US President Donald Trump’s administration said it rescinded its predecessor’s so-called AI diffusion rules. Those rules sought to keep a significant amount of AI
Apple Inc increased iPhone production in India by about 53 percent last year and now makes a quarter of its marquee devices there, reflecting the US company’s efforts to avoid tariffs on China. The company assembled about 55 million iPhones in India last year, up from 36 million a year earlier, people familiar with the matter said, asking not to be named because the numbers aren’t public. Apple makes about 220 million to 230 million iPhones a year globally, with India’s share of the total increasing rapidly. Apple has accelerated its expansion in the world’s most populous country in recent years, bolstered
HEADWINDS: The company said it expects its computer business, as well as consumer electronics and communications segments to see revenue declines due to seasonality Pegatron Corp (和碩) yesterday said it aims to grow its artificial intelligence (AI) server revenue more than 10-fold this year from last year, driven by orders from neocloud solutions clients and large cloud service providers. The electronics manufacturing service provider said AI server revenue growth would be driven primarily by the Nvidia Corp GB300 server platform. Server shipments are expected to increase each quarter this year, with the second half likely to outperform the first half, it said. The AI server market is expected to broaden this year as more inference applications emerge, which would drive demand for system-on-chip, application-specific integrated circuits