Tucked away in a workshop under a London Underground line, vehicles are undergoing a green metamorphosis as they shed their cylinders, spark plugs and pistons for electric engines.
“We don’t create the associated carbon dioxide that comes from creating a new car and we’re not scrapping a perfectly valid old car. It’s win-win,” said Matthew Quitter, founder of London Electric Cars.
London Electric Cars is one of the companies capitalizing on the UK’s flexible regulatory environment and special affection for cars to help grow the fledgling sector.
Photo: AFP
In the workshop, all kinds of vehicles have come to be reborn: Minis, Bentleys, old ones — such as a 20-year-old Volvo station wagon — and some not so old, including a platypus-like Fiat Multipla.
Some families are turning to Quitter to save their beloved vehicles from the crusher, with places such as London expanding road charges for older and more polluting vehicles.
“They’re just keen that they don’t scrap this car because they have an emotional attachment,” he said. “The kids grew up in it and instead want to see it reborn as an electric vehicle.”
Photo: AFP
The cost of a conversion starts at £30,000 (US$30,000) — the equivalent of a new entry-level electric vehicle.
The renovated vehicles have a range of 80km to 300km, depending on the batteries.
This is more than enough when “90 percent to 95 percent of journeys inside London are under six miles [9.7km],” Quitter said.
The old engines can be kept, resold or destroyed.
Most of the vehicles are fitted with Nissan Leaf or Tesla engines, with the aim to stick as close as possible to the vehicle’s original performance and helping to avoid having to adapt the brakes or transmission.
“People realize that combustion engines are a disaster, they stink, they’re full of fumes, they make a lot noise and they’re responsible partly for climate breakdown,” Quitter said. “I think... we will look back on classic car ownership with petrol engines as a sort of anachronism.”
However, the umbrella body for historic automobile clubs, the Federation Internationale des Vehicules Anciens, said in 2019 that such conversions take away from the character of older vehicles and called for reversible modifications instead.
For purists, the noise, vibrations and smell of petrol are all part of the pleasure of an old vehicle.
Yet Quitter’s clients “aren’t interested in that at all,” he said, adding they want the “reliability” of electric cars without the smell and exhaust fumes of a petrol vehicle.
He also dismissed objections of those who say such modifications of classic vehicles are a desecration, saying no one complains about old houses being fitted with modern comforts.
“At the end of the day, it’s a very personal question in terms of what cars, for you, would be sacrilegious to convert,” he said, adding it would be unlikely he’d ever convert an Aston Martin.
He is joined on this point by Garry Wilson, head of the Historic & Classic Vehicles Alliance — which works to preserve vintage vehicles — who cited the Aston DB5, James Bond’s famous car.
Changing engines is something that has been done almost since the beginning of automotive history, but classic cars must be treated with respect, Wilson said.
“There’s an awful lot of vehicles out there where we should class them as part of our national heritage, and therefore should in theory treated like a Grade I listed building, and shouldn’t be modified,” he said.
“We’d be horrified if someone fitted new PVC windows in Blenheim Palace,” Wilson said. “Frankly, the Houses of Parliament would be better off being knocked down and rebuilt in modern materials, but it’s got Big Ben attached to it, it’s one of our national treasures.”
Wilson is also skeptical about the environmental benefits of such conversions for collector vehicles that travel only a few hundred kilometers a year on average, compared with 11,587km a year for contemporary vehicles.
This is especially true if parts for the batteries and engines come from the other side of the world, he said.
Instead, he thinks the solution rests with synthetic fuels, which emit carbon dioxide but are manufactured by absorbing it, and which he predicted would enable the sector to achieve carbon neutrality in 2050.
The government yesterday approved applications by Alphabet Inc’s Google to invest NT$27.08 billion (US$859.98 million) in Taiwan, the Ministry of Economic Affairs said in a statement. The Department of Investment Review approved two investments proposed by Google, with much of the funds to be used for data processing and electronic information supply services, as well as inventory procurement businesses in the semiconductor field, the ministry said. It marks the second consecutive year that Google has applied to increase its investment in Taiwan. Google plans to infuse NT$25.34 billion into Charter Investments Ltd (特許投資顧問) through its Singapore-based subsidiary Fructan Holdings Singapore Pte Ltd, and
Micron Technology Inc is a driving force pushing the US Congress to pass legislation that would put new export restrictions on equipment its Chinese competitors use to make their chips, according to people familiar with the matter. A US House of Representatives panel yesterday was to vote on the “MATCH Act,” a bill designed to close gaps in restrictions on chipmaking equipment. It would also pressure foreign companies that sell equipment to Chinese chipmaking facilities to align with export curbs on US companies like Lam Research Corp and Applied Materials Inc. The bill targets facilities operated by China’s ChangXin Memory Technologies Inc
Singapore-based ride-hailing and delivery giant Grab Holdings’ planned acquisition of Foodpanda’s Taiwan operations has yet to enter the formal review stage, as regulators await supplementary documents, the Fair Trade Commission (FTC) said yesterday. Acting FTC Chairman Chen Chih-min (陳志民) told the legislature’s Economics Committee that although Grab submitted its application on March 27, the case has not been officially accepted because required materials remain incomplete. Once the filing is finalized, the FTC would launch a formal probe into the deal, focusing on issues such as cross-shareholding and potential restrictions on market competition, Chen told lawmakers. Grab last month announced that it would acquire
SECOND-RATE: Models distilled from US products do not perform the same as the original and undo measures that ensure the systems are neutral, the US’ cable said The US Department of State has ordered a global push to bring attention to what it said are widespread efforts by Chinese companies, including artificial intelligence (AI) start-up DeepSeek (深度求索), to steal intellectual property from US AI labs, according to a diplomatic cable. The cable, dated Friday and sent to diplomatic and consular posts around the world, instructs diplomatic staff to speak to their foreign counterparts about “concerns over adversaries’ extraction and distillation of US AI models.” Distillation is the process of training smaller AI models using output from larger, more expensive ones to lower the costs of training a powerful new