Sun, Dec 12, 2021 page12

• Even the smartest investors fall for crypto FOMO

  • By Lionel Laurent / Bloomberg Opinion
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  One of cryptocurrency’s spiritual forebears, Timothy May, predicted in the 1990s that untraceable digital cash would allow online casinos, bank secrecy and money laundering to flourish. Although laws would be dodged, he said, the individual anonymity and freedom would be worth it — at least, until the inevitable government backlash.

  This cycle is playing out almost three decades later, as regulators take a fresh crack at the US$2.4 trillion cryptosector that has ballooned largely out of their reach.

  Crypto executives were grilled by US lawmakers on Wednesday after a series of probes and fines into trading platforms amid a post-COVID-19 digital gold rush.

  

  Physical representations of cryptocurrencies are pictured in an illustration on Nov. 28.

  Photo: Reuters

  The bosses acknowledged the need for more oversight, but warned that draconian rules would chase firms overseas.

  The march toward more regulation is under way, and for good reason. While the execs defended their work policing bad actors, for the most part, anti-money laundering standards and client identification controls still look patchy.

  One survey of 16 platforms in March found that only four were subject to “significant” rules related to trading. Exchange activity primarily takes place in offshore jurisdictions.

  Binance, with no formal head office, is described as being “everywhere and nowhere.” Theft, fraud and hacks are rife.

  Yet what is more unnerving is the pace at which sophisticated investors — not just cyberpunters eager to make a buck — have thrown cash at trading venues regardless. Venture capitalists (VCs) have invested more than US$27 billion in crypto start-ups this year, according to PitchBook, including a US$1 billion funding round for Bahamas-based FTX.

  In May, a firm backed by billionaires Peter Thiel and Alan Howard injected US$10 billion of digital assets and cash into Gibraltar-licensed firm Bullish Global. Binance narrowly failed to raise US$100 million earlier this year; it is trying again.

  VCs obviously have experience with risky bets on firms that disrupt the rules. It is a tried-and-tested template: Move fast, break things and then ask for forgiveness. Regulation is always catching up. Europe’s gig economy rules targeting the likes of Deliveroo Holdings PLC and Uber Technologies Inc have only come after years of the firms’ empire-building, for example.

  Still, it seems rather brave for VCs to be diving head-first into a cryptomarket with opaque actors and enough financial risk that the Bank of England compares it to the 2008 financial crisis — itself a product of “innovation” in mortgage finance.

  The “cypher-punk”-meets-Silicon-Valley enthusiasm has reached institutional investors who are not VCs. Many seem to be tossing aside the kind of counterparty risk management they would rigorously apply in traditional markets just to get a slice of crypto’s potentially vertiginous gains.

  Last year, crypto exchange Binance — which this summer was hit with regulatory warnings around the world — reported a 70 percent increase in institutional clients onboarded. Some hedge funds only decided to leave Binance “a bit” after the warnings.

  It is time for investors to question whether they have allowed the fear of missing out (FOMO) to take over.

  “The legal risk of posting funds within much of this ecosystem cannot be understated,” said Martin Finnegan, partner at Punter Southall Law.

  While a regulated venue like the Chicago Mercantile Exchange is designed to guarantee terms of trade and eliminate counterparty, settlement and default risk, unregulated crypto venues have more conflicted roles combining brokerage, safekeeping and lending.

  The Futures Industry Association has said that a “significant” amount of activity on unregulated platforms could be wash trading and that basic market data cannot be trusted.

  Regulation is already prompting market shifts. New exchanges see playing by the rules as a competitive advantage.

  Archax, a London-based exchange that it says is regulated by the British Financial Conduct Authority as a multilateral trading facility, plans to launch next month.

  Swarm describes itself as the first decentralized finance platform supervised by Germany’s BaFin. Binance and FTX are investing in regulated platforms; they have both shelved some products.

  These shifts would not answer all questions for investors trading crypto.

  Bitcoin would still have a questionable environmental footprint in an environmental, social and governance-conscious world; its price tag would still inspire almost scholastic debates over whether it is digital gold, a proxy for equities, or something else entirely.

  Central bank digital currency experiments, such as those of France and Switzerland, would keep advancing, with potentially very disruptive results.

  However, as regulators try to keep a leash on cyberspeculation, investors should realize that they also have to adjust to a less hospitable world for freewheeling platforms — perhaps sooner than they think.

  Lionel Laurent is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering the EU and France. He worked previously at Reuters and Forbes.

  This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    TSMC and Nvidia team up on silicon photonics, CEO Jensen Huang says

  • 2

    Master sergeant killed after being sucked into engine

  • 3

    Tourist faces a fine after being struck by a train

  • 4

    TikTok could be affecting views of young Taiwanese

  • 5

    Dozens injured after quakes damage buildings