In Little Italy in Boston, Massachusetts, where tourists juggle coffee and cannoli, there is a 3m-wide monument to revenge on the market that could be yours for US$1.2 million.
It is a spite house.
An unusual architectural phenomenon, the property was built not with hope and love, but with venom and Machiavellian planning, with the intention of irritating the neighbors.
Photo: AP
It was reportedly built in 1862 and was the product of a feud between two brothers who inherited land from their father. When one brother returned from the civil war, he found his battle-shy sibling had constructed his own home on the lion’s share of the property, leaving him a plot measuring about 37m2.
In retaliation, he erected the four-story home — directly in front of his brother’s, so that it blocked the light and view.
“You see that section of jagged wall?” said Vito, the real-estate agent selling the property. “That’s what’s left of the first brother’s house. We know who won.”
A property is considered “stigmatized” by the National Association of Realtors (NAR) if it is “psychologically impacted by an event which occurred, or was suspected to have occurred, on the property, such event being one that has no physical impact of any kind.”
A building might be stigmatized because of a feud such as the Boston house, or a death. The building could be the former site of meth lab, the home of a cult or, in some areas, a place that is allegedly haunted.
While about half the states in the US operate under some form of caveat emptor, Latin for “buyer beware,” putting the due diligence on the purchaser, the other half obligate sellers to disclose “stigmas” or void the sale.
“It’s complicated,” NAR associate counsel Deanne Rymarowicz said. “A seller can be subject to a law ... that’s completely different to the town next door.”
As of 2019, at least nine states have death disclosure laws, Zillow said.
The strictest, California, requires mention of deaths in the past three years. In South Dakota, a seller must reveal if a murder took place. In Texas, that is not necessary.
Minnesota and Massachusetts, home of 17th-century witch trial city Salem, tell sellers they do not need to disclose any paranormal happenings, but New Jersey requires them to confess if asked.
New York is the only state where, in some circumstances, it is illegal to sell a haunted house, thanks to the 1991 “Ghostbusters ruling.”
It started in 1989, when the Ackley family put their five-bedroom 1890s home in Nyack, New York, up for sale.
Unbeknown to buyer Jeffrey Stambovsky, the family had a history of discussing paranormal activity in the building, including their daughter’s bed rattling, and were once interviewed by Reader’s Digest. After making his down payment, Stambovsky was told by the agent, and decided to sue.
Remarkably, the case made it all the way to the New York Supreme Court’s appellate division, which voted three to two in his favor, rescinding the sale.
The new law made it illegal to conceal if a building had been marketed as “haunted,” because it could negatively affect the value.
The late Justice Israel Rubin wrote: “As a matter of law, the house is haunted.”
While 40 percent of Americans supposedly believe in ghosts, according to YouGovAmerica, inking it into law is unusual.
“Whether the buyer believes in the paranormal is sometimes irrelevant,” said Randall Bell, who was once called “Dr Disaster” and is considered to be the US’ top property damage economist and expert on “stigmatized” buildings.
He estimates that if a murder took place in a house, it can cause a 10 to 25 percent loss in value.
“I know of a property in Jersey where [a family] bought a house where there had been a murder, which didn’t bother them, but they neglected to think about its reputation. It wrecked birthday parties, barbecues ... all the things people do to make new friends,” he said.
In other words, ghosts are not the problem, humans are.
A harrowing example is the Watcher House. In 2014, the Broaddus family bought a 1905 home in Westfield, New Jersey, for US$1.4 million, and shortly afterward, frightening letters began to arrive.
“I am The Watcher. Bring me your young blood,” one said.
They sued the previous owners, who reportedly also received letters, but New Jersey’s laws have fewer protections for buyers of stigmatized properties than New York, less than 16km away. They lost.
After years of fear, broken neighborly relationships and failed police investigations, the Broaddus family accepted a US$440,000 loss when they sold in 2019. Netflix bought the rights to their story.
Another family who had a similar experience spoke on condition of anonymity, out of fear of “small-town America.”
“I lived that nightmare. What happened to my family was overwhelming,” one member of the family said. “The reality is the people who sold us the house did not tell us the truth and got away with it. If it happened in New York ... we would have gotten our money back. As it is, it nearly destroyed us. The laws are so obtuse and unfair.”
There are few federal laws governing the sale of stigmatized buildings, but in the 1980s, buyers were prevented from suing if someone died in the home from AIDS.
Last year, the NAR advised that properties should not be “stigmatized” by COVID-19.
A big problem, realtors said, is that the Internet makes it difficult for events to fade from memory, so some owners resort to demolishing their home or changing its address to try to outsmart Google.
However, not all haunted homes lose money.
The Ackley Ghostbusters house was sold by the singer Matisyahu for US$1.8 million in March, 160 percent higher than the local average. In May, a bed and breakfast and museum in Fall River, Massachusetts, where Lizzie Borden was accused of murdering her parents with a hatchet in 1892, sold for US$2 million.
Buyer Lance Zaal, founder of US Ghost Adventures, said: “It isn’t scary. It can be an advantage, from a business perspective.”
Along with themed shot glasses and a souvenir doll, the tour company offers “romantic” stays where couples sleep in the rooms where bodies were found, on beds scattered in rose petals.
“We have a new feature where you can pay to leave an axe under someone’s pillow,” he added.
purpose: Tesla’s CEO sought to meet senior Chinese officials to discuss the rollout of its ‘full self-driving’ software in China and approval to transfer data they had collected Tesla Inc CEO Elon Musk arrived in Beijing yesterday on an unannounced visit, where he is expected to meet senior officials to discuss the rollout of "full self-driving" (FSD) software and permission to transfer data overseas, according to a person with knowledge of the matter. Chinese state media reported that he met Premier Li Qiang (李強) in Beijing, during which Li told Musk that Tesla's development in China could be regarded as a successful example of US-China economic and trade cooperation. Musk confirmed his meeting with the premier yesterday with a post on social media platform X. "Honored to meet with Premier Li
Dutch brewing company Heineken NV on Friday announced an investment of NT$13.5 billion (US$414.62 million) over the next five years in Taiwan. The first multinational brewing company to operate in Taiwan, Heineken made the statement at a ceremony held at its brewery in Pingtung County. It also outlined its efforts to make the brewery “net zero” by 2030. Heineken has been in the Taiwanese market for 20 years, Heineken Taiwan managing director Jeff Wu (吳建甫) said. With strong support from local consumers, the Dutch brewery decided to transition from sales to manufacturing in the country, Wu said. Heineken assumed majority ownership and management rights
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: The chipmaker last month raised its capital spending by 28 percent for this year to NT$32 billion from a previous estimate of NT$25 billion Contract chipmaker Powerchip Semiconductor Manufacturing Corp (力積電子) yesterday launched a new 12-inch fab, tapping into advanced chip-on-wafer-on-substrate (CoWoS) packaging technology to support rising demand for artificial intelligence (AI) devices. Powerchip is to offer interposers, one of three parts in CoWoS packaging technology, with shipments scheduled for the second half of this year, Powerchip chairman Frank Huang (黃崇仁) told reporters on the sidelines of a fab inauguration ceremony in the Tongluo Science Park (銅鑼科學園區) in Miaoli County yesterday. “We are working with customers to supply CoWoS-related business, utilizing part of this new fab’s capacity,” Huang said, adding that Powerchip intended to bridge
Microsoft Corp yesterday said that it would create Thailand’s first data center region to boost cloud and artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure, promising AI training to more than 100,000 people to develop tech. Bangkok is a key economic player in Southeast Asia, but it has lagged behind Indonesia and Singapore when it comes to the tech industry. Thailand has an “incredible opportunity to build a digital-first, AI-powered future,” Microsoft chairman and chief executive officer Satya Nadella said at an event in Bangkok. Data center regions are physical locations that store computing infrastructure, allowing secure and reliable access to cloud platforms. The global embrace of AI