The UK plans sweeping powers to intervene in foreign takeovers of British assets if deemed a threat to national security.
A draft law, published yesterday, would expand the range of transactions open to government intervention, the UK Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy said.
There would be scope for fines and retroactive interventions in deals that complete after the bill’s publication — a potentially controversial provision that critics said could deter investors.
The proposed legislation covers sectors including defense, energy and transport, as the government seeks to stop British companies, infrastructure and intellectual property falling into “hostile” ownership.
At the same time, the department said the new scrutiny process would be “slicker” than at present, by imposing set timeframes within which ministers must come to a decision.
“The UK remains one of the most attractive investment destinations in the world and we want to keep it that way,” British Secretary of State for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy Alok Sharma said in a statement. “But hostile actors should be in no doubt — there is no backdoor into the UK.”
Under the National Security and Investment Bill, foreign buyers from all countries purchasing British assets in 17 sectors would be obliged to notify the government of the transaction.
Only some deals in those sectors would be covered, and a separate consultation would determine the full scope of the law.
Ministers would then have 30 days to either allow a transaction to proceed or call it in for further scrutiny on national security grounds.
If that path is chosen, the business secretary would have a further 30 days to make a decision, extendable by another 45 days in the most complex cases.
Punishments for non-compliance with the new regime includes five years imprisonment and fines of as much as 5 percent of global turnover or ￡10 million (US$13.3 million) — whichever is greater.
Transactions subject to mandatory notification that take place without being cleared would be legally void, the department said.
Conditions imposed on sensitive deals could include limits on the size of shareholdings by foreign investors, restrictions on access to commercial information and limits on access to certain projects, it said.
The department has in the past also imposed conditions on pensions and investment.
Once a deal is cleared, ministers would not be able to revisit it — unless inaccurate information was provided.
However, as reported last month by Bloomberg, there are some retroactive elements to the legislation.
Ministers would have five years to scrutinize transactions in the wider economy beyond the 17 sectors.
They would have powers to unpick them if they are judged a threat to national security — a provision the government said is in line with French, Italian and German practice.
The retroactivity would apply from yesterday, so the government would not be able to intervene in already completed deals.
The department estimates that more than 1,000 deals a year might be subject to the new notification requirement, with 70 to 95 called in for further scrutiny and about 10 requiring some sort of remedy.
Until now, interventions have been governed by the 2002 Enterprise Act, which allows government action when a proposed merger would affect media plurality, national security or public contracts.
The department made changes in 2018, which removed thresholds on market share and turnover for some companies, but the new draft legislation would apply across all sectors.
Nissan Motor Co has agreed to sell its global headquarters in Yokohama for ￥97 billion (US$630 million) to a group sponsored by Taiwanese autoparts maker Minth Group (敏實集團), as the struggling automaker seeks to shore up its financial position. The acquisition is led by a special purchase company managed by KJR Management Ltd, a Japanese real-estate unit of private equity giant KKR & Co, people familiar with the matter said. KJR said it would act as asset manager together with Mizuho Real Estate Management Co. Nissan is undergoing a broad cost-cutting campaign by eliminating jobs and shuttering plants as it grapples
TEMPORARY TRUCE: China has made concessions to ease rare earth trade controls, among others, while Washington holds fire on a 100% tariff on all Chinese goods China is effectively suspending implementation of additional export controls on rare earth metals and terminating investigations targeting US companies in the semiconductor supply chain, the White House announced. The White House on Saturday issued a fact sheet outlining some details of the trade pact agreed to earlier in the week by US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) that aimed to ease tensions between the world’s two largest economies. Under the deal, China is to issue general licenses valid for exports of rare earths, gallium, germanium, antimony and graphite “for the benefit of US end users and their suppliers
Dutch chipmaker Nexperia BV’s China unit yesterday said that it had established sufficient inventories of finished goods and works-in-progress, and that its supply chain remained secure and stable after its parent halted wafer supplies. The Dutch company suspended supplies of wafers to its Chinese assembly plant a week ago, calling it “a direct consequence of the local management’s recent failure to comply with the agreed contractual payment terms,” Reuters reported on Friday last week. Its China unit called Nexperia’s suspension “unilateral” and “extremely irresponsible,” adding that the Dutch parent’s claim about contractual payment was “misleading and highly deceptive,” according to a statement
The Chinese government has issued guidance requiring new data center projects that have received any state funds to only use domestically made artificial intelligence (AI) chips, two sources familiar with the matter told Reuters. In recent weeks, Chinese regulatory authorities have ordered such data centers that are less than 30 percent complete to remove all installed foreign chips, or cancel plans to purchase them, while projects in a more advanced stage would be decided on a case-by-case basis, the sources said. The move could represent one of China’s most aggressive steps yet to eliminate foreign technology from its critical infrastructure amid a
RSS