In 1969, Samuel Hargress bought his Harlem jazz bar and the surrounding building for US$35,000. Half a century later, he said real-estate brokers keep pestering him to sell — for US$10 million.
Such is the breakneck pace of gentrification in one of the most storied neighborhoods of Manhattan, for decades a heartland of African-American culture that critics now complain is undergoing intrusive — and whiter — change.
“All of my friends are millionaires now,” 81-year-old Hargress said, sitting in the dimly lit family-run Paris Blues. “You couldn’t imagine it — the situation then and now.”
Hargress moved to Harlem in 1960. Those were the days of the civil rights movement, of Martin Luther King Jr and Malcolm X, the preacher and activist who was based in Harlem.
It is the neighborhood where Ella Fitzgerald won amateur night at the Apollo Theater in 1934, where The Cotton Club launched Duke Ellington’s career — the epicenter of the 1920s to 1930s “Harlem Renaissance.”
However, the 1970s and 1980s brought years of decline, as those years did in other US inner cities. Hargress described streets awash with crime, drugs, pimps and crooked police.
Stroll the boulevards today and urbane New Yorkers sip chilled glasses of white wine in chic cocktail bars, dine in French restaurants or choose from dishes made with kale and avocado.
Churches, hit by rising maintenance costs and declining congregations, are selling up. Luxury condominiums proliferate. Upmarket supermarket chain Whole Foods Market Inc moved in.
In September, a three-family townhouse sold for US$4.15 million, a new Harlem record.
Most point to the 2008 economic crash, which flooded the market with “affordable” properties, as the real impetus for change. Investors swooped, development boomed and wealthier — often white — families started to move in.
However, wealth disparity, as anywhere else, breeds tension.
The owner of one recently opened coffee shop said that while business was growing, he had also called the police on a number of occasions.
“People just coming in and harassing customers, threatening our employees — we’ve had numerous attempts to steal the tip jars,” he said. “It’s just the nature of being in this neighborhood right now.”
Stories have proliferated of newcomers complaining about the noise of poorer neighbors escaping tiny apartments to listen to music or barbecue on the sidewalk.
“I just say: ‘Why did you move here? Nobody invited you,’” said preservationist Michael Henry Adams, who has lived in Harlem since 1985. “You think these people didn’t do this before you arrived? If it offends you, leave. You’re not forced to come here — would you go to Paris and tell Parisians: ‘Oh, we don’t like croissants?’”
However, if rising prices benefit property owners like Hargress and bring better services, lower-income residents, disproportionately Hispanics and African-Americans, are being pushed out by landlords eyeing a wealthier clientele.
For every sign of affluence, there are signs of pressing need. Lines snake outside churches on food pantry mornings.
About 30 percent of Harlem residents live below the federal poverty level, and median income ranges from US$31,000 to US$39,840.
However, Rava Realty owner Riccardo Ravasini said the average one-bedroom apartment in Harlem costs US$2,265 per month to rent.
In a city where most landlords require an annual pretax income 40 times the monthly rent, that predicates earnings of US$90,000 per year.
When chef Julian Medina opened a bright new taco joint in East Harlem, he thought that most of his customers would be Hispanic. Instead they are mostly white Americans.
“It’s just crazy,” 42-year-old Medina told reporters at his La Chula taqueria. “And they’re like: ‘Oh, thank you for opening, because we don’t have anything here.’”
During the evening rush, the restaurant is packed with smart young people gorging on beef tongue, pig cheek or sweet potato and chorizo tacos. Its bright, inviting decor sticks out on a street otherwise replete with old-fashioned delis and dollar stores.
“Everything evolves,” Medina said, when asked about gentrification. “This neighborhood needs something like this.”
However, opening a restaurant in East Harlem is not the bargain it might once have been, even for a chef who runs a string of high-end restaurants downtown.
“Back in the day, I would rent this place, I don’t know, for a third of the price, but now not anymore,” he said. “The market in New York is just getting crazy.”
The New School assistant professor of urban policy Rachel Meltzer said that while gentrification brings better services, it is increasingly harder for city authorities, led by left-leaning New York Mayor Bill de Blasio, to mitigate the negative side effects.
“It’s hard. The reality is in much of these neighborhoods that if property is privately owned, there’s not much the city can do,” she said.
However, that is cold comfort to Adams, recalling an attempt by real-estate agents to rename South Harlem “SoHa” — a play on downtown’s eye-wateringly expensive SoHo.
“My bottom line is that if I and other black people who aren’t rich can’t live here, I don’t give a damn what they call it. It won’t be Harlem and they might just as well call it Trump Town,” he said.
Gogoro Inc (睿能創意) yesterday launched its first electric bicycle, the Gogoro Eeyo 1, in Taiwan, after unveiling the bike in New York in late May and in France on Tuesday. The company said it would also introduce the series in other European countries such as Germany and the Netherlands. The “Eeyo project” is the fourth of Gogoro’s eight projects that concentrate on smart transportation, which includes Gogoro’s electric scooter, battery swap system and electric scooter sharing service, company founder and chief executive officer Horace Luke (陸學森) told a media briefing in Taipei. “There are various types of city commuters. We will not
EXPERIMENTAL DRUG: While news about a COVID-19 vaccine is more eye-catching, developing a treatment would be more viable, the Senhwa boss said Senhwa Biosciences Inc (生華科) aims to raise NT$1.5 billion (US$50.57 million) by issuing 15 million new common shares in the third quarter of this year to fund the research of new drugs, including the experimental drug Silmitasertib for the treatment of COVID-19, the company said on Monday. That would be the firm’s largest fundraising effort after it raised more than NT$1.4 billion from an initial public offering on the Taipei Exchange (TPEX) in April 2017, chief financial officer Sarah Chang (張小萍) told the Taipei Times by telephone. The price of the new shares would depend on the firm’s average share price
NOT A PANACEA: Offering 5G services would not solve the problem of declining telecom incomes, chairman Sheih Chi-mau said, expecting a flat 5G telecom revenue Chunghwa Telecom Co (中華電信) yesterday became the nation’s first telecom to debut its 5G services, offering tiered tariffs that include a threshold of NT$599 and flat rates, as it aims to switch half of its subscribers to the 5G network within three years. Subscribers would have unlimited data transmission for monthly fees starting at NT$1,399 — the same flat rate as when the company launched its 4G service in 2014 — and they can subscribe to the highest-rate plan for NT$2,699 per month for faster data transmission speeds and larger bandwidth, the company said. Data transmission speeds would be within the range
ROW: A probe would determine if the rights of shareholders who were not allowed to vote yesterday had been violated, while the stock exchange also wants answers The election of board directors yesterday at Tatung Co (大同) sparked controversy after the company blocked some institutional and individual shareholders from participating in the general shareholders’ meeting, prompting the Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) to announce that the vote would be investigated. Lin Kuo Wen-yen (林郭文艷) was re-elected as chairwoman of the household-appliance maker’s nine-member board, but prior to the vote she announced that several shareholders would not have voting rights. They were being denied a vote because they had contravened the Business Mergers and Acquisitions Act (企業併購法), and the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and