The story about a US$400 Internet-connected juicer that turned out to be superfluous since a human could simply squeeze juice from its producer’s proprietary packs by hand was destined to go viral and did, with more than 800,000 hits on the Bloomberg Web site and strong reactions in other publications.
It is evidence of a growing resistance to Silicon Valley-style innovation. Countering this resistance is not just a marketing problem for the industry; it is a strategic and perhaps even existential one.
It is easy to laugh at a juice squeezer produced by a relatively small start-up, whose real competence is in making fancy fruit-and-vegetable packets. It is not really problem-solving tech; it is a money-raising gimmick.
The laugh is on the investors who fell for the concept of a high-tech device whose price is an entry fee for a subscription service — which delivers the juice packs.
Disparaging something proposed by Tesla Inc founder and chief executive Elon Musk or Facebook Inc founder Mark Zuckerberg is not as risk-free for a tech pundit, if only because they have armies of fans that rip into critics, and yet these innovation gurus, too, are increasingly proposing gadgets offering solutions to problems that are sometimes imaginary, often unimportant and in some cases are features, rather than bugs, of the human existence.
The media are generally enthusiastic about fully electric cars, though, in terms of consumer qualities, they are at this point inferior to gasoline-powered ones, with shorter driving ranges and long charging times. There is a lot of excitement about self-driving vehicles, though they cannot be safely used on roads without clear lane markings, in poor visibility conditions and under a myriad other common circumstances.
The assumption is that all these obstacles quickly will be overcome: Throw enough money at engineers and they will get there somehow.
Recent promises from Zuckerberg and Musk on brain-computer interfaces are the latest example. Facebook promises to turn thoughts into typed text at the speed of 100 words per minute by scanning the brain without surgical intervention, though researchers have achieved only eight words per minute with the help of an implant.
Musk’s new company, Neuralink Corp, plans to use electrodes implanted in the brain to exchange information between human and computer.
Both promises carry unrealistic timeframes, which is fine because optimism about cutting-edge science rarely gets punished even if it is an indirect method of boosting a tech company’s stock price.
The problem is deeper, though. Musk, a slicker marketer than Zuckerberg, talks about initially releasing a technology that would help people with brain damage — from strokes, for example.
He is aware that twice as many Americans are worried as enthusiastic about brain enhancement through implants. So he is pointing to a real problem that can be solved using this decidedly creepy technology.
Facebook is talking about “sharing thoughts,” hitting precisely on the most worrying aspects of the nascent technology: Who wants to share uncensored thoughts, especially with a company that collects information about its users without explaining to them exactly what is harvested? Who wants to give a machine built by a corporate entity access to one’s brain?
Trust or desperation is required to give up control, and while the tech under development today requires that we allow devices and software to control more and more of our existence, there is a natural limit to how much people are willing to trust the sellers of these products.
Breaking through it might do society a disservice if the makers are not particularly trustworthy. At the same time, few people are desperate enough to actually need the technological enhancements. Most people can drive, type or adjust a thermostat by hand.
A robotic prosthetic hand that can help tie a shoelace is a godsend to a one-armed person. A robot that can actually put the lace in a running shoe — you know, string the hard plastic aglet through the little holes so that the lace can then be tied — would remove a major headache for athletic shoe makers, such as Adidas AG, which currently hire workers to do it.
Tasks that desperately need automation and tech solutions are narrow. Automated driving works fine in mining operations and ports. Brain electrodes can enable a completely paralyzed person to communicate.
However, the Silicon Valley mode of operation is to hype up these technologies to the general public, which does not really need most of them.
Even if there is little hard data about it, the pushback is beginning. Read about the juice squeezer and feel the almost tangible irritation. Thinking smaller, and applying resources and energy to narrow, specific problems could be a good chance to build trust before it disappears entirely.
Leonid Bershidsky is a Bloomberg View columnist. He was the founding editor of the Russian business daily Vedomosti and founded the opinion Web site Slon.ru.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Three experts in the high technology industry have said that US President Donald Trump’s pledge to impose higher tariffs on Taiwanese semiconductors is part of an effort to force Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) to the negotiating table. In a speech to Republicans on Jan. 27, Trump said he intends to impose tariffs on Taiwan to bring chip production to the US. “The incentive is going to be they’re not going to want to pay a 25, 50 or even a 100 percent tax,” he said. Darson Chiu (邱達生), an economics professor at Taichung-based Tunghai University and director-general of
‘LEGACY CHIPS’: Chinese companies have dramatically increased mature chip production capacity, but the West’s drive for secure supply chains offers a lifeline for Taiwan When Powerchip Technology Corp (力晶科技) entered a deal with the eastern Chinese city of Hefei in 2015 to set up a new chip foundry, it hoped the move would help provide better access to the promising Chinese market. However, nine years later, that Chinese foundry, Nexchip Semiconductor Corp (合晶集成), has become one of its biggest rivals in the legacy chip space, leveraging steep discounts after Beijing’s localization call forced Powerchip to give up the once-lucrative business making integrated circuits for Chinese flat panels. Nexchip is among Chinese foundries quickly winning market share in the crucial US$56.3 billion industry of so-called legacy
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co (鴻海精密) is reportedly making another pass at Nissan Motor Co, as the Japanese automaker's tie-up with Honda Motor Co falls apart. Nissan shares rose as much as 6 percent after Taiwan’s Central News Agency reported that Hon Hai chairman Young Liu (劉揚偉) instructed former Nissan executive Jun Seki to connect with French carmaker Renault SA, which holds about 36 percent of Nissan’s stock. Hon Hai, the Taiwanese iPhone-maker also known as Foxconn Technology Group (富士康科技集團), was exploring an investment or buyout of Nissan last year, but backed off in December after the Japanese carmaker penned a deal
WASHINGTON POLICY: Tariffs of 10 percent or more and other new costs are tipped to hit shipments of small parcels, cutting export growth by 1.3 percentage points The decision by US President Donald Trump to ban Chinese companies from using a US tariff loophole would hit tens of billions of dollars of trade and reduce China’s economic growth this year, according to new estimates by economists at Nomura Holdings Inc. According to Nomura’s estimates, last year companies such as Shein (希音) and PDD Holdings Inc’s (拼多多控股) Temu shipped US$46 billion of small parcels to the US to take advantage of the rule that allows items with a declared value under US$800 to enter the US tariff-free. Tariffs of 10 percent or more and other new costs would slash such