Beijing might have averted a crisis in its stock markets with heavy-handed intervention, but the world’s biggest corporate debt pile — US$16.1 trillion and rising — is a much greater threat to its slowing economy.
Corporate China’s debts, at 160 percent of GDP, are twice that of the US, having sharply deteriorated in the past five years, a Thomson Reuters study of more than 1,400 companies shows.
The debt mountain is set to climb 77 percent to US$28.8 trillion over the next five years, credit rating agency Standard & Poor’s estimates.
Beijing’s policy interventions affecting corporate credit have so far been mostly designed to address a different goal — supporting economic growth, which is set to fall to a 25-year low this year.
It has cut interest rates four times since November last year, reduced the level of reserves banks must hold and removed limits on how much of their deposits they can lend.
Although Beijing wants more of that credit going to smaller companies and innovative areas of the economy, such measures are blunt instruments.
“When the credit taps are opened, risks rise that the money is going to ‘problematic’ companies or entities,” RBS Greater China chief economist Louis Kuij said.
China’s banks made 1.28 trillion yuan ($206.12 billion) in new loans last month, a steep climb from May’s 900.8 billion yuan.
The effect of policy easing has been to reduce short-term interest costs, so lending for stock speculation has boomed, but there is little evidence loans are being used for profitable investment in the real economy, where long-term borrowing costs remain high and banks are reluctant to take risks.
Chinese manufacturers’ debts are increasingly dwarfing their profits. The Thomson Reuters study found that in 2010, materials companies’ debts were 2.8 times their core profits. At the end of last year they were 5.3 times. For energy companies, indebtedness has risen from 1.1 to 4.4 times core profit. For industrial firms, from 2.5 to 4.2.
Railway equipment maker Jinxi Axle Co (晉西車軸) has seen its debt-to-core profit multiple triple to 10.25 between 2010 and last year.
Jinxi Axle investor relationship principal Gao Hong said the company struggled to find profitable capital projects to invest in, so put money into short-term bank products that guaranteed returns.
“The risk for these [capital] programs is so high and the rate of return so low that we have to make the best decision for our investors [by] purchasing bank products.” Gao said.
Standard & Poor’s expects Chinese companies to account for 40 percent of the world’s new corporate lending in the period through 2019.
However, quantity is not the only problem.
Getting credit to the most efficient companies, where it has the most impact on the economy, would be easier if inefficient companies were allowed to fail, so markets can price debt effectively.
Policymakers have said they want market mechanisms to play a bigger role in credit pricing, but in practice have baulked at the consequences, effectively bailing out companies in trouble, as it did last year when state-backed Shanghai Chaori Solar Energy Science and Technology Co Ltd (超日太陽能) defaulted on a bond coupon payment.
Rapid debt growth, opacity of risk and pricing and very high debt to GDP are a hazardous combination, Standard & Poor’s said.
It took an unprecedented series of measures to arrest the plunge in China’s stock markets, which are worth just over US$8 trillion and are a minority pursuit for the relatively wealthy.
However, tackling corporate debt might make that seem like child’s play.
“Managing the debt market is probably more dangerous than the stock market because the scale of the debt market is bigger, and without any high-profile default, the moral hazard is a significant issue,” Bank of America Merrill Lynch analyst David Cui said.
‘SWASTICAR’: Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s close association with Donald Trump has prompted opponents to brand him a ‘Nazi’ and resulted in a dramatic drop in sales Demonstrators descended on Tesla Inc dealerships across the US, and in Europe and Canada on Saturday to protest company chief Elon Musk, who has amassed extraordinary power as a top adviser to US President Donald Trump. Waving signs with messages such as “Musk is stealing our money” and “Reclaim our country,” the protests largely took place peacefully following fiery episodes of vandalism on Tesla vehicles, dealerships and other facilities in recent weeks that US officials have denounced as terrorism. Hundreds rallied on Saturday outside the Tesla dealership in Manhattan. Some blasted Musk, the world’s richest man, while others demanded the shuttering of his
ADVERSARIES: The new list includes 11 entities in China and one in Taiwan, which is a local branch of Chinese cloud computing firm Inspur Group The US added dozens of entities to a trade blacklist on Tuesday, the US Department of Commerce said, in part to disrupt Beijing’s artificial intelligence (AI) and advanced computing capabilities. The action affects 80 entities from countries including China, the United Arab Emirates and Iran, with the commerce department citing their “activities contrary to US national security and foreign policy.” Those added to the “entity list” are restricted from obtaining US items and technologies without government authorization. “We will not allow adversaries to exploit American technology to bolster their own militaries and threaten American lives,” US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick said. The entities
Minister of Finance Chuang Tsui-yun (莊翠雲) yesterday told lawmakers that she “would not speculate,” but a “response plan” has been prepared in case Taiwan is targeted by US President Donald Trump’s reciprocal tariffs, which are to be announced on Wednesday next week. The Trump administration, including US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent, has said that much of the proposed reciprocal tariffs would focus on the 15 countries that have the highest trade surpluses with the US. Bessent has referred to those countries as the “dirty 15,” but has not named them. Last year, Taiwan’s US$73.9 billion trade surplus with the US
Taiwan’s official purchasing managers’ index (PMI) last month rose 0.2 percentage points to 54.2, in a second consecutive month of expansion, thanks to front-loading demand intended to avoid potential US tariff hikes, the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research (CIER, 中華經濟研究院) said yesterday. While short-term demand appeared robust, uncertainties rose due to US President Donald Trump’s unpredictable trade policy, CIER president Lien Hsien-ming (連賢明) told a news conference in Taipei. Taiwan’s economy this year would be characterized by high-level fluctuations and the volatility would be wilder than most expect, Lien said Demand for electronics, particularly semiconductors, continues to benefit from US technology giants’ effort
RSS