Tue, Jul 22, 2014 page15

• Global trade pact stalls over New Delhi’s concern

  • Reuters, SYDNEY
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  Efforts to assuage Indian concerns about a landmark global trade agreement appear to have failed, sources involved in the discussions said yesterday, setting off a frantic rush to win the nation’s support before a deadline at the end of the month.

  India is the most prominent of a group of developing nations angry with rich countries for failing to address their concerns about a deal on trade facilitation struck by WTO member states in Bali, Indonesia, last year.

  Proponents believe the deal could add US$1 trillion to global GDP and 21 million jobs by slashing red tape and streamlining customs, eliminating delays at borders that can often cost more than tariffs themselves.

  A failure could prove disastrous for the moribund WTO and the system of global free-trade deals it underpins.

  As late as Sunday, hopes were high that publicly addressing Indian concerns during a G20 meeting of trade ministers in Sydney during the weekend would give it a face-saving path toward reaffirming its assent before the deadline on Thursday next week.

  India stockpiles food for its poor, citing the need for food security, but doing so puts it at risk of breaking the rules of the WTO — which worries that the stockpiling of subsidized food can distort trade.

  In Bali, WTO members agreed to give India a pass on its stockpiles until 2017, while negotiating a permanent solution.

  Officials told reporters that India had not supplied any clear indication of the concessions that it wanted, so attempts were made at the meeting to reassure the country that its concerns — whatever they may be — were being heard.

  “India clearly and forcefully expressed its concern that work proceed on all fronts, including food stockpiling, and received assurances that all G20 members are committed to the full implementation of all Bali agreements on the agreed timetables,” US Trade Representative Michael Froman told reporters yesterday.

  A confidential “Summary of Discussion” circulated to G20 participants by Australian Trade Minister Andrew Robb and obtained by reporters details that one official said was an example of India winning acknowledgment of its concerns.

  The document says that specific Indian concerns about the deal were raised by the members while pledging to work constructively this week to address those issues.

  In principle, the WTO could pass the agreement on the basis of a qualified majority, but experts say that would be unprecedented and virtually impossible in an organization that operates on consensus.

  “India is quite influential, so let’s hope that they’re going to back down in some way,” Peter Gallagher, an expert on free trade and the WTO at the University of Adelaide, told reporters.

  However, despite reassurances the nation received at the meeting and in public afterward, Indian officials again said on Sunday that they were not convinced.

  “The way things are moving, there is no way we can agree to the trade facilitation agreement being pushed by the developed nations at WTO within the prescribed deadline,” an Indian official told the Indian daily Business Standard.

  “Food security has always been India’s main concern and this time we are not going to concede,” the official said.

  One official involved in the negotiations, speaking under the condition of anonymity to speak frankly, said the statement was emblematic of “erratic” Indian behavior over the deal and cast doubt on its trustworthiness as a negotiating partner.

  The conflict over subsidies has raised fears that the so-called trade facilitation agreement — the first-ever global trade agreement under the WTO — will be derailed.

  A deal was reached only after New Delhi extracted promises that its concerns related to food subsidies would be addressed.

  Gallagher said that it was unclear why those concerns were resurfacing now when they are unrelated to trade facilitation.

  Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    China wants new world order, Lai says

  • 2

    Court orders Ko Wen-je’s detention

  • 3

    Silicon photonics alliance formed

  • 4

    Ko Wen-je release quashed

  • 5

    Ko released, ex-deputy mayor detained