InterDigital Inc yesterday said China threatened to arrest or detain its employees over a bid to collect patent royalties from Huawei Technologies Co (華為), amid tightened Chinese government scrutiny of business practices.
China’s National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) said it “couldn’t guarantee the safety of people” sent by InterDigital to a meeting set for this week, William Merritt, chief executive officer of the company that licenses its patents on wireless technologies, said in a phone interview.
“There’s nothing in that statement that can be positive,” he said.
InterDigital’s accusation marks an escalation in a dispute that saw China start a probe into alleged violations of anti-monopoly laws after the company filed an infringement complaint against handset makers including Shenzhen, China-based Huawei at the US International Trade Commission (ITC).
China has begun targeting foreign companies including Qualcomm Inc and Mead Johnson Nutrition Co under a broader crackdown on business practices it says drive up consumer prices.
“The threat of arrest is unprecedented,” Willy Wo-Lap Lam (林和立), an adjunct professor of history at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, said in an e-mail. “This is upping the ante in Beijing’s apparent effort to use psychological warfare to tame foreign companies that are deemed to be overcharging or otherwise short-changing Chinese companies or consumers.”
The Washington-based ITC is scheduled to issue a final decision on InterDigital’s complaint tomorrow.
InterDigital sent a letter on Monday to the head of the NDRC’s anti-monopoly bureau saying they would not attend tomorrow’s meeting because of the threats.
While InterDigital has Chinese patents, it has not filed lawsuits there against Huawei, Merritt said.
It has made non-binding offers to Huawei on licensing the patents, he said.
“From everything we heard, they wanted us over before that date” of the final US trade decision,” Merritt said. “There was some pressure being put on us in China to get ahead of the ITC case.”
Huawei has filed complaints in Europe and China accusing InterDigital of demanding excessive royalties and of failing to fulfill its pledge to license patents that are used in industry standards on fair and reasonable terms.
A Chinese court sided with Huawei in February and ordered InterDigital to pay 20 million yuan (US$3.3 million). InterDigital is appealing.
Huawei “cannot speak to whatever perceptions another company might have about whatever experience they are having with whatever proceedings in which they might be engaged,” said William Plummer, a spokesman for the company, China’s largest maker of phone-network equipment.
“As for the unrelated ITC case, we welcomed last summer’s preliminary ruling” in its favor, Plummer said. “We understand that the final ITC ruling will be issued later this week and we look forward to the appropriate outcome.”
A US trade judge in July found no violation of InterDigital’s patent rights by Huawei, ZTE Corp (中興) or Nokia Oyj.
The judge rejected arguments that InterDigital breached its licensing obligations. The commission is reviewing those findings and can order an import ban of any products found to infringe US patents.
China’s NDRC on Monday said it will begin to supervise pricing in certain industries and punish companies that break antitrust rules. In that statement, the NDRC said it is seeking to strengthen regulation to keep price levels stable, without identifying industries.
BYPASSING CHINA TARIFFS: In the first five months of this year, Foxconn sent US$4.4bn of iPhones to the US from India, compared with US$3.7bn in the whole of last year Nearly all the iPhones exported by Foxconn Technology Group (富士康科技集團) from India went to the US between March and last month, customs data showed, far above last year’s average of 50 percent and a clear sign of Apple Inc’s efforts to bypass high US tariffs imposed on China. The numbers, being reported by Reuters for the first time, show that Apple has realigned its India exports to almost exclusively serve the US market, when previously the devices were more widely distributed to nations including the Netherlands and the Czech Republic. During March to last month, Foxconn, known as Hon Hai Precision Industry
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) and the University of Tokyo (UTokyo) yesterday announced the launch of the TSMC-UTokyo Lab to promote advanced semiconductor research, education and talent development. The lab is TSMC’s first laboratory collaboration with a university outside Taiwan, the company said in a statement. The lab would leverage “the extensive knowledge, experience, and creativity” of both institutions, the company said. It is located in the Asano Section of UTokyo’s Hongo, Tokyo, campus and would be managed by UTokyo faculty, guided by directors from UTokyo and TSMC, the company said. TSMC began working with UTokyo in 2019, resulting in 21 research projects,
Ashton Hall’s morning routine involves dunking his head in iced Saratoga Spring Water. For the company that sells the bottled water — Hall’s brand of choice for drinking, brushing his teeth and submerging himself — that is fantastic news. “We’re so thankful to this incredible fitness influencer called Ashton Hall,” Saratoga owner Primo Brands Corp’s CEO Robbert Rietbroek said on an earnings call after Hall’s morning routine video went viral. “He really helped put our brand on the map.” Primo Brands, which was not affiliated with Hall when he made his video, is among the increasing number of companies benefiting from influencer
Quanta Computer Inc (廣達) chairman Barry Lam (林百里) yesterday expressed a downbeat view about the prospects of humanoid robots, given high manufacturing costs and a lack of target customers. Despite rising demand and high expectations for humanoid robots, high research-and-development costs and uncertain profitability remain major concerns, Lam told reporters following the company’s annual shareholders’ meeting in Taoyuan. “Since it seems a bit unworthy to use such high-cost robots to do household chores, I believe robots designed for specific purposes would be more valuable and present a better business opportunity,” Lam said Instead of investing in humanoid robots, Quanta has opted to invest