In December 2001, over 100 reporters from around the world gathered at Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, to witness the birth of BenQ brand at its China headquarters.
At the time, Taipei-based BenQ Corp (明基) chairman Lee Kun-yao (李焜耀) never thought the company would one day have to say goodbye to the brand business.
On April 25, Lee made a surprising announcement at an investor conference in Taipei, saying that the consumer-electronics maker would spin off its brand operation in September, allowing the company to focus on original design manufacturing (ODM).
PHOTO: EPA
"It is going back to its roots after all," said Allan Pu (卜正倫), an analyst with SinoPac Securities Corp (建華證券).
BenQ spun off from parent Acer Inc in 1984 to become a stand-alone, original equipment manufacturing business. Back then the company was known as Acer Peripherals Inc.
In 1991, the company moved to the next level by venturing into ODM services, had an initial public offering in 1996 and changed its name to Acer Communications & Multimedia Inc in July 2000.
But in a bid to further differentiate itself from Acer, the company in 2002 adopted the BenQ name -- which stands for the company slogan ``bringing enjoyment and quality to life'' -- thus completing the switch from contract manufacturer to brand maker.
Since then, BenQ's road has been a bumpy one. Its shares closed at NT$13.3 on Friday, compared with a record NT$74.30 in April 2000.
"Creating a world-class brandname is an uphill battle. BenQ failed once and the brand now needs further reconstruction," Pu said, adding that SinoPac had stopped tracing BenQ because of its poor performance.
The failure referred to BenQ's takeover of Siemens AG's money-losing handset unit in 2005, which put BenQ in the red with six straight first-quarter losses.
BenQ said last September it would stop funding the German mobile-phone subsidiary, which is now being liquidated.
In September, BenQ will be renamed Jia Da Corp (
It will be easier for BenQ to spin off its brand into an ODM, because the scale of the brand unit will be much smaller after it has disposed of the Siemens handsets, Lee told investors last week.
The spun-off brand unit will retain the BenQ Corp name and initially will be 100 percent owned by Jia Da. Lee said there are plans to attract strategic investors to the brand unit, with Jia Da's stakeholdings in the new BenQ to decrease to 20 percent within five years.
Industry watchers remained skeptical on the spin off project, saying it will take some time to assess its real impact.
"Unlike Acer and Wistron Corp (
In 2001, Acer, the world's No. 3 personal computer maker, spun off its contract manufacturing and design operations into Wistron, an individual outfit which was listed in 2003.
Both companies differ in management and operations, with Acer solely carrying on a high-flying brand business.
The spinoff of the BenQ brand has raised doubts as to whether Lee will finally say goodbye to the brand for good.
The road ahead might be a thorny one, but looking back, the 55-year-old Lee said he doesn't have any regrets.
"The BenQ brand will continue its mission as it is now a household name in China and Taiwan," he said. "One day it will become the pride of the Chinese-speaking world."
UNPRECEDENTED PACE: Micron Technology has announced plans to expand manufacturing capabilities with the acquisition of a new chip plant in Miaoli Micron Technology Inc unveiled a newly acquired chip plant in Miaoli County yesterday, as the company expands capacity to meet growing demand for advanced DRAM chips, including high-bandwidth memory chips amid the artificial intelligence boom. The plant in Miaoli County’s Tongluo Township (銅鑼), which Micron acquired from Powerchip Semiconductor Manufacturing Corp (力積電) for US$1.8 billion, is expected to make a sizeable capacity contribution to the company from fiscal 2028, the company said in a statement. It would be an extended production site of Micron’s large-scale manufacturing hub in Taichung, the company said. As the global semiconductor industry is racing to reach US$1 trillion
Singapore-based ride-hailing and delivery giant Grab Holdings Ltd has applied for regulatory approval to acquire the Taiwan operations of Germany-based Delivery Hero SE's Foodpanda in a deal valued at about US$600 million. Grab submitted the filing to the Fair Trade Commission on Friday last week, with the transaction subject to regulatory review and approval, the company said in a statement yesterday. Its independent governance structure would help foster a healthy and competitive market in Taiwan if the deal is approved, Grab said. Grab, which is listed on the NASDAQ, said in the filing that US-based Uber Technologies Inc holds about 13 percent of
ABOVE LEGAL REQUIREMENT: The Ministry of Economic Affairs is prepared if LNG supply is disrupted, with more than the legal requirement of 11 days of inventory Taiwan has largely secured liquefied natural gas (LNG) supplies through May and arranged about half of June’s supply, Minister of Economic Affairs Kung Ming-hsin (龔明鑫) said yesterday. Since the Middle East conflict began on Feb. 28, Taiwan’s LNG inventories have remained more than 12 days, exceeding the legal requirement of 11 days, indicating no major supply concerns for domestic gas and electricity, Kung said at a meeting of the legislature’s Economics Committee in Taipei. The ministry aims to increase the figure to 14 days by the end of next year, he said. While one or two LNG or crude oil shipments for May
Taiwan’s food delivery market could undergo a major shift if Singapore-based Grab Holdings Ltd completes its planned acquisition of Delivery Hero SE’s Foodpanda business in Taiwan, industry experts said. Grab on Monday last week announced it would acquire Foodpanda’s Taiwan operations for US$600 million. The deal is expected to be finalized in the second half of this year, with Grab aiming to complete user migration to its platform by the first half of next year. A duopoly between Uber Eats and Foodpanda dominates Taiwan’s delivery market, a structure that has remained intact since the Fair Trade Commission (FTC) blocked Uber Technologies Inc’s
RSS