Gary Winnick knew it was a dinner fit for a king when one showed up. Constantine of Greece was among the 240 luminaries that dined on tournedos of Aberdeen Angus that November evening in 1999 at Claridge's Hotel in London.
The elaborate event, paid for by Global Crossing, the communications company founded by Winnick, included a stirring speech on the role of a late 20th-century superpower by William Cohen, then the US secretary of defense, who had flown 16 hours from Chile to dine with Winnick and his guests.
PHOTO: NY TIMES
Celebrated by such figures and buoyed by Global Crossing's soaring stock, Winnick, a recently minted billionaire, seemed to have the world in his palm. Who would have guessed that a kid from Roslyn, New York, would one day rub shoulders with Margaret Thatcher? "One little idea," he once marveled to associates, "and look what's happened to me."
He may no longer want the attention.
In the last month, Global Crossing has collapsed and Winnick -- its chairman -- has troubles aplenty. His reputation has been shattered and his dream of operating a worldwide fiber optic network is in tatters. The fortune he amassed before Global Crossing filed for bankruptcy protection in late January has elicited a chorus of criticism from shareholders who have seen their investments in the company disappear.
The Securities and Exchange Commission and the FBI are investigating Global Crossing's dubious accounting. Employees, investors and corporate governance experts have blasted Winnick's management of the company. "He was the chairman and did not run the company," Winnick's spokesman responded. "The chief executive does."
Others have criticized a style that some associates describe as volatile and arrogant, although Winnick does have some supporters. Stephen Bollenbach, the chief executive of the Hilton Hotels Corp, called Winnick "a good guy." Arnold Kopelson, a Hollywood producer, cited his generosity and his warmth. Others say they have enjoyed working with him.
Still, he has many detractors. Some have criticized a style that associates describe as volatile and arrogant. Others point out that a large chunk of the US$734 million he realized from Global Crossing stock came from share sales that occurred after the company's troubles became clear.
Perhaps no one should have been surprised by his fall. To hear many of Winnick's associates tell it, excess and controversy have periodically played roles in his career since his days at Drexel Burnham Lambert, the failed investment bank famed as the home of Michael Milken.
As head of the convertible bond desk in the Los Angeles office of Drexel, where Milken ruled as the king of junk bonds, Winnick developed a reputation for being condescending and showy. He was the kind of guy who "bragged about his trades," said one co-worker, who spoke on condition of anonymity.
A spokesman for Winnick denied the portrayal.
Winnick, who is 54, left Drexel in 1985, but controversy followed him. In 1989, he received immunity after agreeing to testify against Milken, who served time in prison for securities and reporting violations. Milken, through his spokesman, declined to comment. A spokesman said Winnick had never testified against Milken.
As his affluence grew, Winnick rarely shied away from self-promotion or ostentatious displays of wealth, former associates say. He owns a palatial estate in the Bel Air section of Los Angeles said to be worth US$94 million. He has a luxurious office in Beverly Hills. His fortune has given him access to several rarefied power circles in Los Angeles and Washington. Both former President George W. Bush and the Democratic fund-raiser Terry McAuliffe reaped small fortunes from Global Crossing stock holdings.
Name dropper
"My new best friend is David Rockefeller," one associate remembers Winnick saying after agreeing two years ago to donate US$5 million to the Museum of Modern Art, where Rockefeller is chairman emeritus.
Before Global Crossing's decline, Winnick showered his beneficence on friends like Lodwrick Cook, the co-chairman of Global Crossing (Winnick's own title is chairman, not co-chairman) and a former chief executive of the Atlantic Richfield Co, who received a Rolls-Royce from Winnick as a personal gift. Even critics say he is extremely charitable.
In August 1998, Global Crossing went public at US$12.75 a share, and in February 2000, just before the Internet bubble burst, Global Crossing stock closed at a high of US$61.8125 a share.
In the interim, not only did Winnick become wealthy, but so did many people close to him, including his housekeeper and a friend, the architect Charles Gwathmey.
If Winnick was impulsively generous to his friends, he was also an impulsive and some say difficult manager, who would call meetings while he worked on his treadmill and routinely dismiss managers.
Lacking experience in operations, he hired and then dismissed four chief executives in four years, offering each of them lucrative signing deals and often giving them lucrative separation agreements. Two former chief executives still have strong ties to Global Crossing. Thomas Casey is a member of its board and John Scanlon is chief executive of Asia Global Crossing, its main subsidiary.
Winnick's personal extravagance set the tone for what several former employees say was undisciplined and reckless spending at Global Crossing. The most obvious outlays went for offices and corporate planes. One former executive recalled that the company leased elegant offices in one of the better office parks in Madison, New Jersey, shortly after Robert Annunziata joined the company. Annunziata, based in New Jersey, did not move to Beverly Hills; he served as chief executive from February 1999 to March 2000.
After Global Crossing paid US$3.4 billion for IXNet in February 2000, IXNet's founder, David Walsh, was named president and then co-chief operating officer of Global Crossing. Even though Global Crossing's stock was beginning its ominous descent, the company undertook an extravagant renovation of its office space at 88 Pine St. in Manhattan.
It installed, for example, a custom-made lighting system to emulate fiber optic strands with neon lighting, one former employee recalled. Several former employees say they thought Walsh had a decorator working almost all the time, redesigning two floors. One recalled that Walsh put in a staircase linking the 29th and 30th floors, then had it changed at a cost the former employee said he believed exceeded US$250,000. A company spokeswoman said the work was started before the purchase of IXNet.
Even last year, as the stock plummeted, the company continued to operate five jets: a Boeing 737, a Challenger, a Gulfstream, an Astra and another plane, a seven-seater. "The company did not need more than one or two planes," one former executive said. Now, according to the spokeswoman, it leases two planes.
A lack of discipline extended beyond offices and planes, according to at least three former Global Crossing employees.
One said the company spent money needlessly for software systems. For example, in early 2000, Global Crossing decided to buy software made by SAP, the German company, for accounting and human resources management, according to a former Global Crossing executive.
This person recalled that several Global Crossing executives were told that it would cost the company at least US$150 million for the systems, and that Global Crossing did not need to buy them because it already had adequate accounting and human resources software.
The company ordered the software anyway, although it was never fully installed, this person said. When installation efforts stalled, Global Crossing's executive vice president for finance, Joseph Perrone, who had been at Arthur Andersen before joining Global Crossing, hired Andersen's consulting division to examine the problem. The company spokeswoman said it had eventually installed the software, but gave no date.
No product profitability measures
One former employee of the Frontier Corp, which Global Crossing acquired in 1999, was surprised to learn after the merger Global never had product profitability measures. They track whether individual products are making money and allow companies to decide whether to continue selling certain products, withdraw them from the market or modify them. At one meeting with Perrone to discuss the importance of such measurements, "he didn't want to put them in," this person recalled. "He said, `They are way too complicated.'"
The company spokeswoman declined to comment.
By the middle of last year, these problems were minor irritations compared with the threat facing Global Crossing -- an overwhelming glut of communications capacity industrywide. So Winnick began a search for investors willing to inject cash into his ailing company.
Winnick found an ally in this search in Steven Green, who had stepped down as US ambassador to Singapore in February 2001. Winnick had met Green nearly 20 years earlier, through Leon Black, another associate from Winnick's days at Drexel.
With Green's help, Winnick cemented contacts with Singapore Technologies Telemedia, a communications company controlled by the Singapore government. Green and Winnick also invested in K1 Ventures, a Singapore-based investment firm controlled by Singapore Technologies' parent company, just as Global Crossing's decline was accelerating last year.
Winnick also lured Hutchison Whampoa, a Hong Kong conglomerate controlled by the billionaire Li Ka-shing, to invest in Global Crossing. Winnick has referred to Li as LK to show how close the two are, a former associate of Winnick said.
By the time Hutchison Whampoa and Singapore Technologies formally agreed to invest in Global Crossing, however, it was too late for Winnick to retain control. They agreed to buy it out of bankruptcy for US$750 million, a fraction of its listed asset value of US$22.5 billion, but the possible success of the bid remained unclear.
Global Crossing's bankruptcy filing wiped out Winnick's own stake in the company, eliminating much of his influence over operations. He is still chairman, but it is unclear whether Global Crossing's new owners will want him to remain connected to the company.
Some investors think this point may be moot if Global Crossing is forced into liquidation and its assets auctioned, a possibility that grows stronger with each day that passes without an offer to rival that of the Asian companies.
Three experts in the high technology industry have said that US President Donald Trump’s pledge to impose higher tariffs on Taiwanese semiconductors is part of an effort to force Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) to the negotiating table. In a speech to Republicans on Jan. 27, Trump said he intends to impose tariffs on Taiwan to bring chip production to the US. “The incentive is going to be they’re not going to want to pay a 25, 50 or even a 100 percent tax,” he said. Darson Chiu (邱達生), an economics professor at Taichung-based Tunghai University and director-general of
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co (鴻海精密) is reportedly making another pass at Nissan Motor Co, as the Japanese automaker's tie-up with Honda Motor Co falls apart. Nissan shares rose as much as 6 percent after Taiwan’s Central News Agency reported that Hon Hai chairman Young Liu (劉揚偉) instructed former Nissan executive Jun Seki to connect with French carmaker Renault SA, which holds about 36 percent of Nissan’s stock. Hon Hai, the Taiwanese iPhone-maker also known as Foxconn Technology Group (富士康科技集團), was exploring an investment or buyout of Nissan last year, but backed off in December after the Japanese carmaker penned a deal
SUPPORT: The government said it would help firms deal with supply disruptions, after Trump signed orders imposing tariffs of 25 percent on imports from Canada and Mexico The government pledged to help companies with operations in Mexico, such as iPhone assembler Hon Hai Precision Industry Co (鴻海精密), also known as Foxconn Technology Group (富士康科技集團), shift production lines and investment if needed to deal with higher US tariffs. The Ministry of Economic Affairs yesterday announced measures to help local firms cope with the US tariff increases on Canada, Mexico, China and other potential areas. The ministry said that it would establish an investment and trade service center in the US to help Taiwanese firms assess the investment environment in different US states, plan supply chain relocation strategies and
WASHINGTON POLICY: Tariffs of 10 percent or more and other new costs are tipped to hit shipments of small parcels, cutting export growth by 1.3 percentage points The decision by US President Donald Trump to ban Chinese companies from using a US tariff loophole would hit tens of billions of dollars of trade and reduce China’s economic growth this year, according to new estimates by economists at Nomura Holdings Inc. According to Nomura’s estimates, last year companies such as Shein (希音) and PDD Holdings Inc’s (拼多多控股) Temu shipped US$46 billion of small parcels to the US to take advantage of the rule that allows items with a declared value under US$800 to enter the US tariff-free. Tariffs of 10 percent or more and other new costs would slash such