The head of the Consumers' Foundation said Friday that the national lottery profits from the poor only to bolster government coffers.
"With excessive coverage from the media, the twice-a-week lottery has increased social deterioration. It is the happiness of the minority [of lottery operators, the government and a few winners] built on the pain of the majority," Yu Ming-kuo (游明國), chairman of the Consumers' Foundation, said in a conference on the subject held last Friday.
Yu added that calling it the "public welfare" lottery was "highly questionable."
The government claims "26.7 percent of lottery revenue has been spent on social welfare. But half of it will be used as reserves of national annuity (
While the computerized Public Welfare Lottery (
Some of the harshest comments came from Vice President Annette Lu (呂秀蓮), who hinted the "social landslide" should be eliminated early last week. Others have proposed that the frequency of lottery drawings should be reduced from twice to once a week.
But by the next day, broad public appeal forced Lu to eat her words: She said did not intend to ax the legal gambling, but was just encouraging Taiwanese people to "make money with their consciences," instead of dreaming of becoming rich overnight.
Minister of Finance Lee Yung-san (李庸三) has jumped on the bandwagon, saying "Many countries have a lottery, but Taiwan is too crazy about it."
He also advised the public to stay focused on work and asked TaipeiBank to review its advertising policies.
One government official said the lottery has a role to play in society.
"The Public Welfare Lottery has its legitimate and legal place in society," said Huang Tien-mu (
"One of the goals of issuing the lottery is to suppress illegal gambling. The government can provide a fairer lottery system. The lottery comes with original sin -- the question is whether it's successful overall. The government will look into any negative side effects," Huang said.
Meanwhile, another pundit called for deregulation of the gambling sector as a way of cooling lotto fever.
"The lottery does not create any economic resources -- it is only a kind of wealth redistribution. The government should therefore reduce the frequency of lottery drawings and deregulate gambling in the private sector. Following deregulation, the gambling frenzy may cool down," said Wu Chung-chi (
But an executive at lottery operator TaipeiBank disagreed with talk of reducing the frequency of drawings.
"Nearly 190 countries run lottery drawings twice a week," said Richard Yang (楊瑞東), vice president and general manager of TaipeiBank's lottery department. "Since the domestic lottery has only been running for one month, we should not jump to conclusions. Furthermore, if the drawing was changed to once a week, the jackpot would rise and stimulate the public to buy even more lottery tickets," Yang said.
An executive from the Consumers' Foundation also questioned the legality of lottery advertising.
"According to Government Information Office regulations, speculative products such as gambling and lotteries are banned from public advertising. Why does the government allow TaipeiBank to run television advertising spots for the lottery," said Yu Ying-fu (尤英夫), an attorney with the foundation.
An information office official responded by saying, "The lottery is a legal product, so there is no reason to ban its advertisements."
While the debate is expected to continue, the is little chance of the lottery being suspended.
According to an official report from the National Gambling Impact Study Commission in the US, no state lottery has been suspended or abolished since 1964, when a modern lottery was first introduced in New Hampshire.
Thirty-seven US states and the District of Columbia are now operating lotteries, with sales in 1996 totaling US$42.9 billion. US$13.8 billion, or 32 percent of the take, went to the US government that year.
CHIP RACE: Three years of overbroad export controls drove foreign competitors to pursue their own AI chips, and ‘cost US taxpayers billions of dollars,’ Nvidia said China has figured out the US strategy for allowing it to buy Nvidia Corp’s H200s and is rejecting the artificial intelligence (AI) chip in favor of domestically developed semiconductors, White House AI adviser David Sacks said, citing news reports. US President Donald Trump on Monday said that he would allow shipments of Nvidia’s H200 chips to China, part of an administration effort backed by Sacks to challenge Chinese tech champions such as Huawei Technologies Co (華為) by bringing US competition to their home market. On Friday, Sacks signaled that he was uncertain about whether that approach would work. “They’re rejecting our chips,” Sacks
NATIONAL SECURITY: Intel’s testing of ACM tools despite US government control ‘highlights egregious gaps in US technology protection policies,’ a former official said Chipmaker Intel Corp has tested chipmaking tools this year from a toolmaker with deep roots in China and two overseas units that were targeted by US sanctions, according to two sources with direct knowledge of the matter. Intel, which fended off calls for its CEO’s resignation from US President Donald Trump in August over his alleged ties to China, got the tools from ACM Research Inc, a Fremont, California-based producer of chipmaking equipment. Two of ACM’s units, based in Shanghai and South Korea, were among a number of firms barred last year from receiving US technology over claims they have
It is challenging to build infrastructure in much of Europe. Constrained budgets and polarized politics tend to undermine long-term projects, forcing officials to react to emergencies rather than plan for the future. Not in Austria. Today, the country is to officially open its Koralmbahn tunnel, the 5.9 billion euro (US$6.9 billion) centerpiece of a groundbreaking new railway that will eventually run from Poland’s Baltic coast to the Adriatic Sea, transforming travel within Austria and positioning the Alpine nation at the forefront of logistics in Europe. “It is Austria’s biggest socio-economic experiment in over a century,” said Eric Kirschner, an economist at Graz-based Joanneum
BUBBLE? Only a handful of companies are seeing rapid revenue growth and higher valuations, and it is not enough to call the AI trend a transformation, an analyst said Artificial intelligence (AI) is entering a more challenging phase next year as companies move beyond experimentation and begin demanding clear financial returns from a technology that has delivered big gains to only a small group of early adopters, PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) Taiwan said yesterday. Most organizations have been able to justify AI investments through cost recovery or modest efficiency gains, but few have achieved meaningful revenue growth or long-term competitive advantage, the consultancy said in its 2026 AI Business Predictions report. This growing performance gap is forcing executives to reconsider how AI is deployed across their organizations, it said. “Many companies
RSS