The head of the Consumers' Foundation said Friday that the national lottery profits from the poor only to bolster government coffers.
"With excessive coverage from the media, the twice-a-week lottery has increased social deterioration. It is the happiness of the minority [of lottery operators, the government and a few winners] built on the pain of the majority," Yu Ming-kuo (游明國), chairman of the Consumers' Foundation, said in a conference on the subject held last Friday.
Yu added that calling it the "public welfare" lottery was "highly questionable."
The government claims "26.7 percent of lottery revenue has been spent on social welfare. But half of it will be used as reserves of national annuity (
While the computerized Public Welfare Lottery (
Some of the harshest comments came from Vice President Annette Lu (呂秀蓮), who hinted the "social landslide" should be eliminated early last week. Others have proposed that the frequency of lottery drawings should be reduced from twice to once a week.
But by the next day, broad public appeal forced Lu to eat her words: She said did not intend to ax the legal gambling, but was just encouraging Taiwanese people to "make money with their consciences," instead of dreaming of becoming rich overnight.
Minister of Finance Lee Yung-san (李庸三) has jumped on the bandwagon, saying "Many countries have a lottery, but Taiwan is too crazy about it."
He also advised the public to stay focused on work and asked TaipeiBank to review its advertising policies.
One government official said the lottery has a role to play in society.
"The Public Welfare Lottery has its legitimate and legal place in society," said Huang Tien-mu (
"One of the goals of issuing the lottery is to suppress illegal gambling. The government can provide a fairer lottery system. The lottery comes with original sin -- the question is whether it's successful overall. The government will look into any negative side effects," Huang said.
Meanwhile, another pundit called for deregulation of the gambling sector as a way of cooling lotto fever.
"The lottery does not create any economic resources -- it is only a kind of wealth redistribution. The government should therefore reduce the frequency of lottery drawings and deregulate gambling in the private sector. Following deregulation, the gambling frenzy may cool down," said Wu Chung-chi (
But an executive at lottery operator TaipeiBank disagreed with talk of reducing the frequency of drawings.
"Nearly 190 countries run lottery drawings twice a week," said Richard Yang (楊瑞東), vice president and general manager of TaipeiBank's lottery department. "Since the domestic lottery has only been running for one month, we should not jump to conclusions. Furthermore, if the drawing was changed to once a week, the jackpot would rise and stimulate the public to buy even more lottery tickets," Yang said.
An executive from the Consumers' Foundation also questioned the legality of lottery advertising.
"According to Government Information Office regulations, speculative products such as gambling and lotteries are banned from public advertising. Why does the government allow TaipeiBank to run television advertising spots for the lottery," said Yu Ying-fu (尤英夫), an attorney with the foundation.
An information office official responded by saying, "The lottery is a legal product, so there is no reason to ban its advertisements."
While the debate is expected to continue, the is little chance of the lottery being suspended.
According to an official report from the National Gambling Impact Study Commission in the US, no state lottery has been suspended or abolished since 1964, when a modern lottery was first introduced in New Hampshire.
Thirty-seven US states and the District of Columbia are now operating lotteries, with sales in 1996 totaling US$42.9 billion. US$13.8 billion, or 32 percent of the take, went to the US government that year.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) secured a record 70.2 percent share of the global foundry business in the second quarter, up from 67.6 percent the previous quarter, and continued widening its lead over second-placed Samsung Electronics Co, TrendForce Corp (集邦科技) said on Monday. TSMC posted US$30.24 billion in sales in the April-to-June period, up 18.5 percent from the previous quarter, driven by major smartphone customers entering their ramp-up cycle and robust demand for artificial intelligence chips, laptops and PCs, which boosted wafer shipments and average selling prices, TrendForce said in a report. Samsung’s sales also grew in the second quarter, up
LIMITED IMPACT: Investor confidence was likely sustained by its relatively small exposure to the Chinese market, as only less advanced chips are made in Nanjing Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) saw its stock price close steady yesterday in a sign that the loss of the validated end user (VEU) status for its Nanjing, China, fab should have a mild impact on the world’s biggest contract chipmaker financially and technologically. Media reports about the waiver loss sent TSMC down 1.29 percent during the early trading session yesterday, but the stock soon regained strength and ended at NT$1,160, unchanged from Tuesday. Investors’ confidence in TSMC was likely built on its relatively small exposure to the Chinese market, as Chinese customers contributed about 9 percent to TSMC’s revenue last
LOOPHOLES: The move is to end a break that was aiding foreign producers without any similar benefit for US manufacturers, the US Department of Commerce said US President Donald Trump’s administration would make it harder for Samsung Electronics Co and SK Hynix Inc to ship critical equipment to their chipmaking operations in China, dealing a potential blow to the companies’ production in the world’s largest semiconductor market. The US Department of Commerce in a notice published on Friday said that it was revoking waivers for Samsung and SK Hynix to use US technologies in their Chinese operations. The companies had been operating in China under regulations that allow them to import chipmaking equipment without applying for a new license each time. The move would revise what is known
UNCERTAINTY: A final ruling against the president’s tariffs would upend his trade deals and force the government to content with billions of dollars in refunds The legal fight over US President Donald Trump’s global tariffs is deepening after a federal appeals court ruled the levies were issued illegally under an emergency law, extending the chaos in global trade. A 7-4 decision by a panel of judges on Friday was a major setback for Trump, even as it gives both sides something to boast about. The majority upheld a May ruling by the Court of International Trade that the tariffs were illegal. However, the judges left the levies intact while the case proceeds, as Trump had requested, and suggested that any injunction could potentially be narrowed to apply
RSS