Credit card issuers have teamed up with Taiwanese universities to profit from getting cash-strapped college students hooked on swiping plastic. And with schools nationwide set to start the fall semester in the next few weeks, a new throng of potential customers stands ready to start out their adult lives by digging a deep financial hole.
This comes in direct contrast to the apparent policy trend on US university campuses. Many US schools -- after nearly two decades of allowing credit-card peddlers and college students to mix freely on campuses -- have learned a sad lesson from the volatile combination.
According to a critical 1999 study from Georgetown University sociologist Robert Manning and the Consumer Federation of America, past studies of students and credit cards have failed to report on the seriousness of the problem.
"The unrestricted marketing of credit cards on college campuses is so aggressive that it now poses a greater threat than alcohol or sexually transmitted diseases," Manning said.
Nearly 500 US colleges and universities last year took heed of the call and banned credit-card marketers from their campuses. In addition, the US Congress and several state legislatures have climbed on board with legislation that will curb the marketing and issuing of cards to college students.
Manning said "financial naivete" was behind the growing student credit-card debt dilemma, as well as "the extension of unaffordable credit lines, increasing education-related expenses and peer pressure to spend."
While the cost of a college education in Taiwan is a mere fraction of the cost of obtaining a degree in a US school, the practice of encouraging card use by the education system itself may be a recipe for disaster here. It remains to be seen if Taiwanese students are any more financially mature than their US counterparts, or whether Taiwan officials -- new to the potential problems associated with student credit-card use -- will learn from the tough lessons their American counterparts have learned.
US educators say the credit fallout results in students reducing course load to work more hours at a part-time jobs and applying for student loans to pay off the debt they've run up on credit cards. Many exit school life thousands of dollars in the red. On average US students carry a monthly debt of US$2,600. The push over past decades to get US students hooked has succeeded, with a whopping 78 percent of all university students choosing to pay with plastic.
But the numbers come with a price tag for US schools too: many facilities are finding it necessary to allocate increasing amounts of cash to fund the rising demand for student credit counseling services. The seemingly insurmountable debt have triggered several student suicides in the US.
The first signs of trouble from the local student credit push have apparently not appeared on university campuses, but rather on the home front.
"We get lots of complaints from parents seeking to limit student access to credit cards," Tom Huang (
Taiwanese parents are not only outraged at the credit card offensive going on at college campuses, they are tired of being asked to foot the bill.
"Parents think card companies are irresponsible ... and they don't want their children to have a bad credit record, so they pay the bill."
A single payment missed will place a black mark on a student's credit record for five years, according to a Chinatrust Commercial Bank (
The surging number of complaints from parents has spurred the bureau to "request the Banker's Association (銀行公會) to self-regulate its behavior and limit the number of promotions targeting students," Huang said. The association is the official bridge to all of Taiwan's banks, public and private.
But banks such as Chinatrust -- the largest issuer of credit cards in Taiwan -- don't appear to be heeding the appeal.
At present, Chinatrust has deals with nine schools to issue cards branded with the university name. And the schools -- keen to beef-up university coffers -- are all too ready to encourage the use of their university-branded cards on campus.
For example, Taiwan's top university -- National Taiwan University -- promotes the cards to all its students and skims a sweet 1.5 percent of total sales from the Chinatrust deal, according to a former university official.
Multiply that number by China-trust's 90,000 student cards in circulation and the attraction becomes obvious.
And for those students who failed to do their homework and read the fine print of the card's minimum payment agreement, Chinatrust passes out the lesson university educators have yet to teach -- financial responsibility.
CHIP RACE: Three years of overbroad export controls drove foreign competitors to pursue their own AI chips, and ‘cost US taxpayers billions of dollars,’ Nvidia said China has figured out the US strategy for allowing it to buy Nvidia Corp’s H200s and is rejecting the artificial intelligence (AI) chip in favor of domestically developed semiconductors, White House AI adviser David Sacks said, citing news reports. US President Donald Trump on Monday said that he would allow shipments of Nvidia’s H200 chips to China, part of an administration effort backed by Sacks to challenge Chinese tech champions such as Huawei Technologies Co (華為) by bringing US competition to their home market. On Friday, Sacks signaled that he was uncertain about whether that approach would work. “They’re rejecting our chips,” Sacks
NATIONAL SECURITY: Intel’s testing of ACM tools despite US government control ‘highlights egregious gaps in US technology protection policies,’ a former official said Chipmaker Intel Corp has tested chipmaking tools this year from a toolmaker with deep roots in China and two overseas units that were targeted by US sanctions, according to two sources with direct knowledge of the matter. Intel, which fended off calls for its CEO’s resignation from US President Donald Trump in August over his alleged ties to China, got the tools from ACM Research Inc, a Fremont, California-based producer of chipmaking equipment. Two of ACM’s units, based in Shanghai and South Korea, were among a number of firms barred last year from receiving US technology over claims they have
It is challenging to build infrastructure in much of Europe. Constrained budgets and polarized politics tend to undermine long-term projects, forcing officials to react to emergencies rather than plan for the future. Not in Austria. Today, the country is to officially open its Koralmbahn tunnel, the 5.9 billion euro (US$6.9 billion) centerpiece of a groundbreaking new railway that will eventually run from Poland’s Baltic coast to the Adriatic Sea, transforming travel within Austria and positioning the Alpine nation at the forefront of logistics in Europe. “It is Austria’s biggest socio-economic experiment in over a century,” said Eric Kirschner, an economist at Graz-based Joanneum
BUBBLE? Only a handful of companies are seeing rapid revenue growth and higher valuations, and it is not enough to call the AI trend a transformation, an analyst said Artificial intelligence (AI) is entering a more challenging phase next year as companies move beyond experimentation and begin demanding clear financial returns from a technology that has delivered big gains to only a small group of early adopters, PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) Taiwan said yesterday. Most organizations have been able to justify AI investments through cost recovery or modest efficiency gains, but few have achieved meaningful revenue growth or long-term competitive advantage, the consultancy said in its 2026 AI Business Predictions report. This growing performance gap is forcing executives to reconsider how AI is deployed across their organizations, it said. “Many companies
RSS