South Korea's parliament voted yesterday to set up an independent inquiry into claims that the nation's biggest business group Samsung operated a huge bribery operation.
Legislators from all parties voted 155-17 for a bill to appoint an independent counsel despite objections from the government, which said such an inquiry would tarnish Samsung and the country.
State prosecutors have already launched a separate investigation into claims by a former employee that Samsung had created a slush fund to bribe hundreds of prosecutors, officials and journalists.
The South Korean giant denies the allegations.
"An independent counsel is feared to seriously hurt the reputation of [Samsung] and our country," Justice Minister Chung Soung-jin told parliament's judicial committee earlier in the day, urging politicians to wait for the outcome of the prosecutors' probe.
Samsung wields enormous influence in South Korea, to the extent that some critics refer to it as the "Republic of Samsung."
Group-wide assets are valued at US$280.8 billion and its exports were worth US$66.3 billion last year, more than 20 percent of the nation's total.
South Korean President Roh Moo-hyun has hinted at a veto of the bill, saying an independent counsel could conflict with the prosecution probe.
Apart from the slush fund claims, the bill calls for a probe into illegal funds provided during and after the last presidential election.
Some campaign managers for Roh and for his then-opponent Lee Hoi-chang, now an independent presidential candidate, were jailed in 2004 for taking illegal campaign funds from Samsung.
Samsung said the probe could damage its business at a tough time.
"It is very regrettable that Samsung faces a probe by an independent counsel at a time when its business environment is not good," a group statement said. "We are very concerned that it may aggravate our difficulties next year."
The bill authorizes an independent counsel, to be recommended by an association of lawyers, to lead a team comprising three assistants and 30 investigators for a two-month inquiry.
It would also authorize investigations into suspicions that group boss Lee Kun-hee illegally traded shares of its subsidiaries to transfer ownership to his son.
In 2005 two Samsung executives were given suspended jail terms after being convicted of illegally handling the father-to-son transfer of ownership.
The slush fund claims were made by Kim Yong-chul, who headed the group's in-house legal team for seven years until 2004.
Kim said he himself had bribed prosecutors on behalf of Samsung and accused it of hiding slush funds in the bank accounts of executives. He has produced no evidence in public, and Samsung has described the claims as groundless.
Two executives are suing the former lawyer for defamation.
However, Samsung was hit again last week after a former legal aide to Roh said one of its officials offered him a cash bribe hidden inside a book in 2004. He said he rejected it.
Samsung and other giant groups known as chaebol spearheaded the nation's dramatic rise from postwar poverty to prosperity. But their reckless expansion was partly blamed for triggering the financial crisis of 1997.
Top conglomerates have often been accused of cozy ties to politicians and of a lack of transparency.
MORE VISITORS: The Tourism Administration said that it is seeing positive prospects in its efforts to expand the tourism market in North America and Europe Taiwan has been ranked as the cheapest place in the world to travel to this year, based on a list recommended by NerdWallet. The San Francisco-based personal finance company said that Taiwan topped the list of 16 nations it chose for budget travelers because US tourists do not need visas and travelers can easily have a good meal for less than US$10. A bus ride in Taipei costs just under US$0.50, while subway rides start at US$0.60, the firm said, adding that public transportation in Taiwan is easy to navigate. The firm also called Taiwan a “food lover’s paradise,” citing inexpensive breakfast stalls
TRADE: A mandatory declaration of origin for manufactured goods bound for the US is to take effect on May 7 to block China from exploiting Taiwan’s trade channels All products manufactured in Taiwan and exported to the US must include a signed declaration of origin starting on May 7, the Bureau of Foreign Trade announced yesterday. US President Donald Trump on April 2 imposed a 32 percent tariff on imports from Taiwan, but one week later announced a 90-day pause on its implementation. However, a universal 10 percent tariff was immediately applied to most imports from around the world. On April 12, the Trump administration further exempted computers, smartphones and semiconductors from the new tariffs. In response, President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration has introduced a series of countermeasures to support affected
CROSS-STRAIT: The vast majority of Taiwanese support maintaining the ‘status quo,’ while concern is rising about Beijing’s influence operations More than eight out of 10 Taiwanese reject Beijing’s “one country, two systems” framework for cross-strait relations, according to a survey released by the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) on Thursday. The MAC’s latest quarterly survey found that 84.4 percent of respondents opposed Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formula for handling cross-strait relations — a figure consistent with past polling. Over the past three years, opposition to the framework has remained high, ranging from a low of 83.6 percent in April 2023 to a peak of 89.6 percent in April last year. In the most recent poll, 82.5 percent also rejected China’s
PLUGGING HOLES: The amendments would bring the legislation in line with systems found in other countries such as Japan and the US, Legislator Chen Kuan-ting said Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Chen Kuan-ting (陳冠廷) has proposed amending national security legislation amid a spate of espionage cases. Potential gaps in security vetting procedures for personnel with access to sensitive information prompted him to propose the amendments, which would introduce changes to Article 14 of the Classified National Security Information Protection Act (國家機密保護法), Chen said yesterday. The proposal, which aims to enhance interagency vetting procedures and reduce the risk of classified information leaks, would establish a comprehensive security clearance system in Taiwan, he said. The amendment would require character and loyalty checks for civil servants and intelligence personnel prior to