A plan to boost taxes on US citizens living abroad while slashing other taxes is drawing an angry response from businesses as well as organizations representing US expatriates.
The bill drafted by the Senate Finance Committee, which seeks to cut some US$350 billion overall over a 10-year period, would recoup some of that by eliminating a longstanding tax exemption for Americans living overseas.
The Senate bill still must be reconciled with legislation passed by the House of Representatives.
To offset some of the tax cuts, the Senate plan includes proposals to raise revenues by eliminating tax breaks to some US firms that move offshore, and -- in a more controversial move -- ending the US$80,000 annual income exclusion for US citizens abroad, known as the Section 911 exclusion.
Without that exclusion, most Americans abroad would be taxed twice, because the US, unlike most other countries, taxes its citizens living anywhere in the world.
David Hamod, a Washington consultant and executive director of the Section 911 Coalition, which represents US firms, chambers of commerce and schools operating overseas, said the Senate panel made a huge mistake.
"The committee was looking for a quick fix, but I don't think they fully understood the magnitude of what they were doing," Hamod said, arguing that the exemption for US workers abroad got muddled in with the question of offshore tax shelters.
"There was some confusion about offshore companies and overseas Americans, but the two are almost diametrically opposed. ... Sending Americans abroad creates jobs and promotes American exports."
But Senator Charles Grassley, who crafted the bill, said it was no mistake.
"Part of tax relief is tax fairness," he said. "I have to ask whether it's fair for taxpayers to underwrite the cost of sending employees overseas ... an American soldier who spends a year in Kabul has to pay his full US tax obligation, but an American working for a private company in Bermuda pays no taxes."
Opponents contend that companies and employees would face double taxation under the proposal.
"The tax exclusion for overseas income should be expanded, not scrapped," said Thomas Donohue, president of the US Chamber of Commerce.
"These workers play a vital role in promoting our national interests, and their presence helps support US exports and creates US-based jobs."
Official estimates put the number of US private citizens abroad at around four million, but Hamod said the figure is closer to 10 million, because the official number includes only those who have registered with US embassies.
Congressional experts say that ending the tax exclusion would bring in some US$35 billion over 10 years.
US business groups with overseas links and others have started an intense lobbying campaign to maintain the exclusion, arguing that the Senate bill would make it much harder and more costly to send Americans to overseas posts.
"The United States is one of the few nations to tax its citizens when they live and work in other nations -- the misguided practice of `worldwide' taxation," said Daniel Mitchell, a researcher at the conservative Heritage Foundation.
Eliminating the exclusion, said Mitchell, "hurts US companies trying to compete in global markets and reduces American exports. It also is a form of double taxation, since US citizens employed in other nations are subject to all applicable taxes in those nations."
Senate Democratic leader Tom Daschle said his party would fight to strip out that provision in the bill.
"There are tens of thousands of people who work abroad and work with an understanding that they're helping America's economy because of our globalized economic interdependence," he said.
"We need people abroad to take those jobs, to continue to grow this economy as much as we can ... This is a huge tax increase on working families all over the world at the very time when we need them, perhaps, even more than ever."
‘NO SECURITY RISK’: The Railway Bureau reassured the public that the technicians’ activities were limited to technical guidance and did not involve sensitive systems The Railway Bureau yesterday said it had invited eight Chinese technicians to assist with an airport MRT construction project. The bureau issued the confirmation after an Internet user said Chinese nationals had entered the construction zone of Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport’s Terminal 3 project. They asked why “individuals from an enemy state” were allowed access to such a major national infrastructure project, which raised serious concerns over Taiwan’s industrial safety, sensitive systems and information security. The bureau’s Northern Region Engineering Branch Office said subcontractor Taiwan Handle Industrial Co (台灣手把工業) of the Taoyuan airport MRT’s “Contract No. CU05 Project A14 Station Civil, MEP &
The National Chungshan Institute of Science and Technology yesterday showcased its locally developed variants of the Vision 60 robotic patrol dog, which it plans to deploy on the nation’s outlying territories in the South China Sea. The variants were produced under the Joint Lab project — created by the institute and domestic companies — and assembled with domestically produced motors, lenses and artificial intelligence (AI) systems alongside licensed tech from the US, Missile and Rocket Systems Research Division deputy director Jen Kuo-kang (任國光) told the media event at a military base in Taipei’s Dazhi (大直) area. Taiwan has built up its strengths
TIT-FOR-TAT: The US allegedly revoked the visa of a Chinese national working at Xinhua News Agency in the US in response to Beijing’s expulsion of Vivian Wang The Presidential Office yesterday condemned China for expelling a New York Times correspondent from Beijing following the newspaper’s interview with President William Lai (賴清德), saying the move highlighted Beijing’s suppression of press freedom and its threat to international news media. Taiwan has noted a series of recent incidents in which Beijing used similar tactics to “threaten and pressure international media outlets and journalists,” Presidential Office spokeswoman Karen Kuo (郭雅慧) said in a statement. “This concerns not only press freedom and freedom of expression, but also the safety of journalists, and Taiwan and relevant partners are paying close attention to the situation,” she
NOT IMMEDIATE: Taiwan has a chance to appeal the proposed 10 percent tariff before it starts, while other countries face a 12.5 percent tariff from the trade office Taiwan is among 60 economies determined by the US to have failed to impose or enforce a ban on the importation of goods produced with forced labor, according to a notice released on Tuesday by the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR), which proposed imposing an additional 10 percent or more tariff on them. The USTR in a statement said that following an investigation, it had determined under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 that the failure of the 60 economies to impose and effectively enforce a prohibition on the importation of goods produced with forced labor is
RSS