Some lawmakers are accusing US President Donald Trump of obstruction of justice after revelations that former FBI director James Comey wrote a private account of the president asking him to shut down an investigation into former US national security adviser Michael Flynn.
Congressional Democrats were already concerned that Trump was trying to stifle a probe into possible coordination between his campaign and Russia’s election meddling by firing Comey last week.
Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal said in a statement that “we are witnessing an obstruction of justice case unfolding in real time.”
However, obstruction of justice is a tricky issue both criminally and politically, and legal experts say it could be difficult to prove.
WHAT IS OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE?
Simply put, it is preventing authorities — such as police or prosecutors — from doing the work of investigating and applying the law.
WHAT IS TRUMP ACCUSED OF DOING?
Comey wrote that Trump asked him to end an investigation into Flynn during a February meeting in the Oval Office.
Comey, who was known to keep a paper trail of sensitive meetings, chronicled the president’s request in a memo he produced soon after the conversation, according to a Comey associate who reviewed the document and spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity.
Flynn had just been forced to resign after lying about the nature of his contacts with the Russian ambassador.
The White House disputed the account of the Comey memo.
IS SUCH A REQUEST AN OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE?
Obstructing justice applies to a variety of scenarios — such as threatening a juror, retaliating against a witness or impeding a grand jury proceeding — and Trump’s alleged request would not fit neatly into any of them, legal experts said.
“No one would write a federal statute with this situation in mind because it’s such an extraordinary situation,” Cornell University Law School dean Jens Ohlin said.
Meddling in a federal investigation could qualify as impeding a judicial proceeding under the obstruction statute, but to bring a charge a prosecutor would have to show the president was trying to “corruptly” influence the probe.
George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley said Trump would have some lines of defense.
“The president can claim he was raising an issue of concern for a longtime associate,” Turley said. “That doesn’t mean that the question was not wildly improper, and frankly, would border on the moronic.”
ISN’T THERE EVIDENCE?
Comey’s memos could be valuable in any obstruction investigation.
“What you have is contemporaneous documentation of Comey’s recollection of what the president said,” said Bob Bauer, who served as White House counsel under former US president Barack Obama. “That’s obviously a very powerful piece of evidence.”
However, barring recordings, a memo still becomes a case of “he said, she said,” former prosecutor Jonathan Lopez said.
Still, there is also a witness: Comey.
“He’s around and the best evidence of what happened in that meeting would be to call him as a witness,” said Barbara McQuade, former US attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan.
OTHER POSSIBLE ACTIONS
Even if this did not lead to a criminal conviction, such a request could add to the basis for impeachment for obstruction of justice.
“It’s the whole pattern here, it’s firing Comey and also directing him to end the investigation against Flynn, all of these things are done because he wants to stop an investigation from reaching the highest echelons of the administration and possibly him personally,” Ohlin said. “It’s the type of political self-dealing that is intolerable.”
However, Turley said that might not be enough.
“What we have is a memo of a president asking highly inappropriate questions of an FBI director,” he said. “This would be pretty thin soup for even an impeachment proceeding.”
Le Tuan Binh keeps his Moroccan soldier father’s tombstone at his village home north of Hanoi, a treasured reminder of a man whose community in Vietnam has been largely forgotten. Mzid Ben Ali, or “Mohammed” as Binh calls him, was one of tens of thousands of North Africans who served in the French army as it battled to maintain its colonial rule of Indochina. He fought for France against the Viet Minh independence movement in the 1950s, before leaving the military — as either a defector or a captive — and making a life for himself in Vietnam. “It’s very emotional for me,”
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi reaffirmed his pledge to replace India’s religion-based marriage and inheritance laws with a uniform civil code if he returns to office for a third term, a move that some minority groups have opposed. In an interview with the Times of India listing his agenda, Modi said his government would push for making the code a reality. “It is clear that separate laws for communities are detrimental to the health of society,” he said in the interview published yesterday. “We cannot be a nation where one community is progressing with the support of the Constitution while the other
The Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) Central Committee is to gather in July for a key meeting known as a plenum, the third since the body of elite decisionmakers was elected in 2022, focusing on reforms amid “challenges” at home and complexities broad. Plenums are important events on China’s political calendar that require the attendance of all of the Central Committee, comprising 205 members and 171 alternate members with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) at the helm. The Central Committee typically holds seven plenums between party congresses, which are held once every five years. The current central committee members were elected at the
CODIFYING DISCRIMINATION: Transgender people would be sentenced to three years in prison, while same-sex relations could land a person in jail for more than a decade Iraq’s parliament on Saturday passed a bill criminalizing same-sex relations, which would receive a sentence of up to 15 years in prison, in a move rights groups condemned as an “attack on human rights.” Transgender people would be sentenced to three years’ jail under the amendments to a 1988 anti-prostitution law, which were adopted during a session attended by 170 of 329 lawmakers. A previous draft had proposed capital punishment for same-sex relations, in what campaigners had called a “dangerous” escalation. The new amendments enable courts to sentence people engaging in same-sex relations to 10 to 15 years in prison, according to the