A bloodied Ukraine yesterday marked three years since it launched a campaign against Russian-backed eastern separatists that now looks like an interminable conflict whose terms are dictated by the Kremlin.
More than 10,000 people have died in Europe’s only warzone in that time — a figure unimaginable when Kiev was riding the jubilant high of its February 2014 pro-EU revolution in which a self-enriching pro-Kremlin regime was sent fleeing into Russian exile.
However, warning signs of Moscow refusing to let Ukraine slip out of its orbit and into the West’s arms without a fight emerged almost immediately as Russia swarmed Crimea with troops and then annexed Ukraine’s Black Sea peninsula in March 2014.
Armed men wearing no insignia on their uniforms, but proclaiming pro-Russian slogans, began taking over Ukranian government buildings across the nation’s industrial east the following month.
Russia initially denied sending crack soldiers to Crimea and still calls the separatist conflict a “civil war” in which it has played no part.
However, Kiev and the West say there is overwhelming evidence showing Moscow has sent troops and weapons across the border throughout the unrest and effectively turned the conflict into an undeclared war between the two ex-Soviet neighbors.
One of Europe’s bloodiest crises since the 1990s Balkans wars illustrates how difficult it is for countries once part of the Soviet Union to chart their own course.
More than two years of European efforts to bring peace to the EU’s backyard through talks have produced little beyond periodic truces that have always been followed by more violence and death.
Ukraine was already among Europe’s poorest states in 2014, due to decades of mismanagement and graft.
The war pushed its blighted economy into a two-year recession that now sees Ukrainians’ per capita GDP stand at just one-fifth of the European average.
The three years also did little to shake politics loose of the influence of a few tycoons who still play an outsized role in making big policy decisions.
“Reforms face strong pushback from vested interests,” the IMF said on Tuesday last week after releasing another tranche of its US$17.5 billion Ukrainian rescue package.
Ukranian President Petro Poroshenko’s dream of applying for EU membership by 2020 and one day joining NATO now looks out of reach.
The Ukrainian leader put aside the chocolate empire that made him into a billionaire to emerge as a unifying figure who appeared corruption-free and ready to fulfil the aspirations of the vast crowds of protesters involved in the 2013-2014 street uprising in which more than 100 died.
The political turmoil of early 2014 culminated with his overwhelming victory in a May 25 presidential election.
Poroshenko promised the next afternoon to put an immediate end to a conflict that was then only a month old.
Ukraine’s military campaign “cannot and will not last for two or three months,” Poroshenko said in front of flashing cameras of the global media. “It should last several hours.”
However, Poroshenko’s challenge was taken up immediately by the insurgents. They stormed the main airport in what later became their de facto capital city of Donetsk that same week.
It marked a new and far graver chapter in a war that at its peak saw a dozen or more people killed every day.
There appears to be little chance of peace as a plan hammered out by Russia, Ukraine, Germany and France in February 2015 has stalled.
A Western official said Ukraine’s heavy-handed ground tactics and overall approach to the Russian-speaking region complicated a reconciliation that could make the country whole again.
Kiev “is not making it easy for the east to be part of Ukraine in some meaningful way,” the Western official told reporters on condition of anonymity.
Donetsk city resident Arkady agreed.
“It will be hard for us to be one with Ukraine again,” 50-year-old Arkady told reporters without revealing his last name for safety reasons.
Analysts also doubt that Russian President Vladimir Putin will change his approach.
“As long as the current authorities continue to run Russia, it is hard to see them letting Ukraine go,” Lilia Shevtsova of London-based Chatham House think tank said.
FOX HUNT: To suppress dissent, Chinese living abroad that Xi Jinping sees as threats are told to either return to China or commit suicide, Christopher Wray said Chinese agents have been pursuing hundreds of Chinese nationals living in the US in an effort to force their return, as part of a global campaign against the country’s diaspora, known as Operation Fox Hunt, FBI Director Christopher Wray said on Tuesday. In a speech about the security threat posed by China, during which he said Beijing’s counterintelligence work was the “greatest long-term threat to our nation’s information and intellectual property, and to our economic vitality,” Wray gave the example of one Fox Hunt target who was given a choice of going back to China or killing themselves. Fox Hunt was launched
‘WOULD NOT COMPLY’: The company’s user data are kept in Singapore and it would not turn the data over to Beijing even if asked, TikTok chief executive Kevin Mayer said Social media app TikTok has distanced itself from Beijing after India banned 59 Chinese apps in the country, according to a correspondence seen by Reuters. In a letter to the Indian government dated on Sunday last week and seen by Reuters on Friday, TikTok chief executive Kevin Mayer said the Chinese government has never requested user data, nor would the company turn it over if asked. TikTok, which is not available in China, is owned by China’s ByteDance, but has sought to distance itself from its Chinese roots to appeal to a global audience. Along with 58 other Chinese apps, including Tencent
‘FIGHT FOR FREEDOM’: Hong Kongers will never bow to Beijing, the advocate said, while the US’ envoy to the territory called China’s new security law a ‘tragedy’ The world must stand in solidarity with Hong Kongers after Beijing imposed sweeping national security legislation on the semi-autonomous territory, advocate Joshua Wong (黃之鋒) said yesterday, vowing to continue campaigning for democracy. Wong, one of the territory’s most prominent young advocates and a figure loathed by Beijing, was speaking outside a court where he and fellow advocates are being prosecuted for involvement in last year’s pro-democracy protests. China last week enacted sweeping security legislation for the restless territory, banning acts of subversion, secession, terrorism and collusion with foreign forces. The legislation has sent a wave of fear through the territory, and criminalized dissenting
INTERNET CURBS: People are rushing to erase their digital footprints after police given powers over online activity, although it might take years for the full effect to be felt At midnight on Tuesday, the Great Firewall of China, the vast apparatus that limits the country’s Internet, appeared to descend on Hong Kong. Unveiling expanded police powers as part of contentious new national security legislation, the Hong Kong government enabled police to censor online speech, and force Internet service providers to hand over user information and shut down platforms. Many residents, already anxious since the legislation took effect last week, rushed to erase their digital footprint of any signs of dissent or support for the past year of protests. Hong Kong Legislator Charles Mok (莫乃光), a pro-democracy member of the Legislative