Plaintiffs described methods used by a counseling group in Jersey City, New Jersey, from which they had sought help: One of them, a young man hoping to overcome his attraction to other men, said he had been told to grab a tennis racket, scream and beat an effigy of his mother as if killing her.
This week, in a lawsuit brought against the counseling group by that man and three others, a state Superior Court judge in Hudson County, New Jersey, ruled that counselors selling so-called conversion therapy with claims that homosexuality was a curable mental disorder were engaged in consumer fraud.
The ruling earned accolades from advocates who are working to end such therapy across the country. However, the lawyer for the counseling group, Jews Offering New Alternatives for Healing, or JONAH, said that the case was not over and that the judge had agreed to allow a jury to hear arguments on issues of fact.
He added that whichever side lost the suit would most likely appeal.
In a decision favoring the plaintiffs on some issues, but not all, judge Peter Bariso wrote that mental-health professionals had refuted the notion that homosexuality was a disorder and that describing it “not as being a normal variation of human sexuality, but as being a mental illness” violated the state’s consumer fraud act.
The judge also wrote that promoting the therapy by touting “success” statistics “when there is no factual basis for calculating such statistics” would further violate the law. He did not address whether JONAH had done so.
Last week, in another pre-trial ruling in the case, which was filed in 2012 and is expected to go to trial this summer, Bariso prohibited JONAH from calling five expert witnesses because he said their supposed expertise rested on the faulty premise that homosexuality was a sickness.
He allowed a sixth expert witness to testify on a separate issue.
Neither ruling sets a binding precedent in New Jersey or elsewhere Southern Poverty Law Center deputy legal director David Dinielli said.
Still, Dinielli said he was thrilled about the decisions, which he contended would have a lasting effect.
The ruling issued this week was “monumental and devastating to the conversion-therapy industry,” he said in a news release. “For the first time, a court has ruled that it is fraudulent as a matter of law for conversion therapists to tell clients that they have a mental disorder that can be cured. This is the principal lie the conversion therapy industry uses throughout the country to peddle its quackery to vulnerable clients.”
National Center for Lesbian Rights’ “Born Perfect” campaign coordinator Samantha Ames said: “We can now stand before state legislatures and point to this ruling, which confirms that testimony from anyone who claims conversion therapy is effective and safe is not an expert in the medical or mental health fields.”
However, Charles LiMandri, the lawyer representing JONAH, said the judge’s decisions would have a limited impact on the debate over conversion therapy. He also said the rulings would not thwart his argument that the group only used the term “disorder” to describe the Torah’s view of homosexuality.
“Judge Bariso is a Superior Court judge in New Jersey,” LiMandri said. “The case has no precedential impact.”
The suit seeks financial damages and the closing of JONAH. Of the four men who originally sued — three Orthodox Jews and one Mormon, all of whom were between 17 and 26 when they underwent the therapy — one has been dismissed from the case after a finding that his mother, not he, paid for the therapy. She and the mother of another of the men are also plaintiffs.
The plaintiffs claim they had spent thousands of US dollars on conversion therapy that JONAH and its affiliates helped perform between 2007 and 2009, as well as conventional therapy to undo what they say was the psychological damage caused by the conversion therapy.
New Jersey is one of the three jurisdictions that prohibit licensed mental health professionals from performing conversion therapy on young people; California and Washington, DC, are the others.
Le Tuan Binh keeps his Moroccan soldier father’s tombstone at his village home north of Hanoi, a treasured reminder of a man whose community in Vietnam has been largely forgotten. Mzid Ben Ali, or “Mohammed” as Binh calls him, was one of tens of thousands of North Africans who served in the French army as it battled to maintain its colonial rule of Indochina. He fought for France against the Viet Minh independence movement in the 1950s, before leaving the military — as either a defector or a captive — and making a life for himself in Vietnam. “It’s very emotional for me,”
The Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) Central Committee is to gather in July for a key meeting known as a plenum, the third since the body of elite decisionmakers was elected in 2022, focusing on reforms amid “challenges” at home and complexities broad. Plenums are important events on China’s political calendar that require the attendance of all of the Central Committee, comprising 205 members and 171 alternate members with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) at the helm. The Central Committee typically holds seven plenums between party congresses, which are held once every five years. The current central committee members were elected at the
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi reaffirmed his pledge to replace India’s religion-based marriage and inheritance laws with a uniform civil code if he returns to office for a third term, a move that some minority groups have opposed. In an interview with the Times of India listing his agenda, Modi said his government would push for making the code a reality. “It is clear that separate laws for communities are detrimental to the health of society,” he said in the interview published yesterday. “We cannot be a nation where one community is progressing with the support of the Constitution while the other
CODIFYING DISCRIMINATION: Transgender people would be sentenced to three years in prison, while same-sex relations could land a person in jail for more than a decade Iraq’s parliament on Saturday passed a bill criminalizing same-sex relations, which would receive a sentence of up to 15 years in prison, in a move rights groups condemned as an “attack on human rights.” Transgender people would be sentenced to three years’ jail under the amendments to a 1988 anti-prostitution law, which were adopted during a session attended by 170 of 329 lawmakers. A previous draft had proposed capital punishment for same-sex relations, in what campaigners had called a “dangerous” escalation. The new amendments enable courts to sentence people engaging in same-sex relations to 10 to 15 years in prison, according to the