The man who hopes to unseat Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos did not mince his words in the final televised debate ahead of today’s election, telling his rival: “It’s not possible to respect you. You don’t have the stature,” as he stood close enough to Santos to land a punch — and looked as if he wanted to.
“Calm down, calm down,” Santos urged Oscar Ivan Zuluaga, putting his palms up at his lectern.
Colombia’s nastiest presidential campaign in years has focused largely on a single issue: Santos’ prescription for ending the nation’s half-century-old guerrilla conflict.
The US-educated incumbent says peace is near after 18 months of slow-going talks in Cuba that he had hoped to wrap up months ago. Zuluaga, a former minister of finance running for the Democratic Center coalition and who never misses a chance to remind voters of his small-town roots, accuses Santos of selling Colombia out to an insurgency already on the ropes.
The hand-picked candidate of former Colombian president Alvaro Uribe, who remains a powerful political player, Zuluaga won the most votes among the five candidates in the election’s first round on May 25.
Zuluaga has set what appear to be impossible conditions for continued peace talks if he wins: The rebels must halt all military activity and some would essentially have to agree to jail time.
With the country’s enduring conflict claiming more than 200,000 lives and stunting economic growth, outsiders might think the peacemaker would have an edge, but this is Colombia, where “peace is a strange land,” said political analyst Leon Valencia, a former rebel with Colombia’s No. 2 rebel band, the National Liberation Army.
The prospect of a peace accord has divided the country, with most opinion polls calling the race a dead heat. Uribe and Zuluaga say the peace Santos is negotiating would mean “terrorist murderers” entering the Colombian Congress, while Santos denies he would let war criminals to go unpunished.
The irony is that Santos, first as Uribe’s minister of defense and then in his first two years as president, wielded a US-backed military to badly weaken the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), killing its top leaders and flattening jungle camps with airstrikes.
The only Colombian who can take as much credit for withering FARC is Uribe himself, who took Santos’ talks as a personal affront and has been wielding Twitter like a Gatling gun against Santos.
Zuluaga’s foes say he is nothing more than a puppet of Uribe, who was elected to the Colombian Senate in March and for whom he served as finance minister.
Yet Valencia said that far from caring about Uribe’s hold on Zuluaga, the candidate’s backers “like that he is a puppet and not someone who is going to betray Uribe like Santos did.”
This week, Santos won key endorsements and may have regained some momentum. He got the backing of 80 top business leaders and announced exploratory talks with the National Liberation Army. The US and EU already back his negotiations with the FARC.
On Friday, the brother the FARC commander whose 2011 killing was ordered by Santos publicly endorsed the president and forgave him for the death of Guillermo Leon Saenz, better known by his nom de guerre Alfonso Cano.
Santos is opposed by Colombia’s cattle ranchers and palm oil plantation owners, beneficiaries of a deal Uribe made with far-right paramilitaries that dismantled their militias. Large landholders had by then consolidated control over territory that the militias had largely rid of rebels, while driving at least 3 million poor locals off the lands. They dislike Santos’ peace pact because it would facilitate the return of stolen lands.
One problem for Santos is that the FARC talks have dragged on and that Colombians rank other issues as more important. A Gallup poll early this month found that less than 5 percent of respondents think the FARC will be the next president’s main problem.
Spreading the benefits of a growing economy is more important to many Colombians.
Today’s election is not really about Zuluaga and Santos, political scientist Marcela Prieto said, “It is about who fears Uribe versus who fears the FARC.”
Young Chinese, many who fear age discrimination in their workplace after turning 35, are increasingly starting “one-person companies” that have artificial intelligence (AI) do most of the work. Smaller start-ups are already in vogue in Silicon Valley and elsewhere, with rapidly advancing AI tools seen as a welcome teammate even as they threaten layoffs at existing firms. More young people in China are subscribing to the model, as cities pledge millions of dollars in funding and rent subsidies for such ventures, in alignment with Beijing’s political goal of “technological self-reliance.” “The one-person company is a product of the AI era,” said Karen Dai
South Korea’s air force yesterday apologized for a 2021 midair collision involving two fighter jets, a day after auditors said the pilots were taking selfies and filming during the flight and held them responsible for the accident. “We sincerely apologize to the public for the concern caused by the accident that occurred in 2021,” an air force spokesman told a news conference, adding that one of the pilots involved had been suspended from flying duties, received severe disciplinary action and has since left the military. The apology followed a report released on Wednesday by the South Korean Board of Audit and Inspection,
About 240 Indians claiming descent from a Biblical tribe landed at Tel Aviv airport on Thursday as part of a government operation to relocate them to Israel. The newcomers passed under a balloon arch in blue and white, the colors of the Israeli flag, as dozens of well-wishers welcomed them with a traditional Jewish song. They were the first “bnei Menashe” (“sons of Manasseh”) to arrive in Israel since the government in November last year announced funding for the immigration of about 6,000 members of the community from the states of Manipur and Mizoram in northeast India. The community claims to descend from
‘TROUBLING’: The firing of Phelan, who was an adviser to a nonprofit that supported the defense of Taiwan, was another example of ‘dysfunction’ under Trump, a US senator said US Secretary of the Navy John Phelan has been fired, a US official and a person familiar with the matter said on Wednesday, in another wartime shakeup at the Pentagon coming just weeks after US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth ousted the Army’s top general. The Pentagon announced his departure in a brief statement, saying he was leaving the administration “effective immediately,” but it did not provide a reason or say whether it was his decision to go. The sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said Phelan was dismissed in part because he was moving too slowly to implement reforms to
RSS